Remove this Banner Ad

malceski expected 3-month recovery from ACL

  • Thread starter Thread starter Shaymuhz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Shaymuhz

Club Legend
Joined
Nov 12, 2006
Posts
1,144
Reaction score
457
Location
1060 West Addison
AFL Club
Fremantle
http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/sport/afl/story/0,26576,23275688-19742,00.html

Malceski could be back by round 8

Mike Sheahan | February 26, 2008 12:00am


  • AS FUTURISTIC as it sounds, Sydney's Nick Malceski could be back playing football within three months after the biggest knee surgery of them all.
Malceski had his ruptured anterior cruciate ligament repaired in Sydney on Friday in a procedure that has revolutionised knee repairs in Europe.
The dashing half-back was walking unaided yesterday, just three days after surgery, even doing light exercise. The Swans hope he will return as soon as Round 8 (May 18).
Conventional wisdom in football says players don't play in the year in which they tear the ACL.
Malceski, 22, happily agreed to the procedure when informed it offered the opportunity to play this year.
Injured in Launceston on February 17, he underwent what is known as a ligament augmentation and reconstruction system (LARS), where a ligament made of industrial-strength polyester fibres is used to replace the torn natural ligament.
Sydney club doctor Nathan Gibbs learned of the LARS advance 15 months ago during one of the club's now famous intelligence-gathering missions to Europe.
Malceski was operated on by a Sydney orthopaedic surgeon, who has been using the technique for 12 months, under the guidance of the visiting French surgeon who pioneered the surgery.
"He (Dr J. P. Labouro) was in Australia lecturing about the technique the very week Malceski was injured, which was extremely fortuitous," Dr Gibbs said.
"With the LARS procedure, it's an inert ligament . . . you screw it in and, technically, it's as strong as it will be from day one.
"In simple terms, the basic way we've done cruciate reconstructions is you put some new tissue or material in there to reconstruct or recreate the cruciate ligament.
"Most of the time you take body parts, usually a tendon from the kneecap or from the hamstring.
"Not having to take tendons means you don't have the trauma of getting over that side of things, so the rehabilitation is quicker for that reason alone.
"The ideal time to try this procedure is when you've got an important player who is injured early in the season, so there's plenty of time to get back. If it's unsuccessful, you would know by May-June, and he'd still have plenty of time to do the traditional operation and be back for the following season."
Malceski agreed to take the risk after discussions with officials, coaching staff and his family.
"We're confident it's not going to fail, but if the worst thing happens, then we know we won't stuff up two seasons," Dr Gibbs said.
Malceski had his other knee reconstructed in conventional style in 2004, missing the entire season.
"We're aiming for 12 weeks, which would mean Round 8-9," Dr Gibbs said. "The first seven to 10 days, he's just waiting for the wounds to heal, although he's already doing some static quadricep work and things like that."
Malceski is expected to start running again after six weeks.
"There's some great anecdotal stories. American gridiron players fly to Europe to get their cruciates done," Dr Gibbs said.
"One guy played after weeks and played the last 10 games."
Already several players are expected to miss the 2008 AFL season because of knee injuries from pre-season games.
They include Fremantle's Paul Hasleby and Brad Dick (Collingwood) and Mitch Brown (West Coast) from the same game in Albany at the weekend.












Why didnt hase get it?:(
 
Is this what the eagles were against giving their kid that did his knee?

Haselby for his entire career has had his injuries miss-managed, he has played when injured and constantly been rushed back. I don't believe he is the ideal candidate as a test case.

Didn't we try something "ultra cutting edge" with Clem Michael?
 
I'm actually glad Hase didn't have this surgery. I'd rather be safe then sorry.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

As someone else said, not a good idea after the Clem debacle.

Would try it on a Webster, but couldn't you imagine the decades of shit we'd cop from other people..."Freo, shit, blah Clem Michael blah, Croad, blah, Francis, blah blah, Lloyd, wee wee, Hasleby, blah blah".

I couldn't handle that. Go the tried and trusted.
 
I'm pretty happy we didn't go for it after reading that 2nd article.

Knowing Hase's luck the implant would snap and he'd have fibres floating around inflaming his knee for the rest of his life.
 
I would rather err on the side of caution with our players...
Knees are never the same when you have reconstruction... why play around with some frankenstein procedure
 
having read that 2nd article i have changed my mind...:o

guess im still finding it hard to get over hase being out for the year after such a promising pre-season
 
We can live without Hase for a year [only a year though!]. Macca 's been able to play on after his bad knee has been fixed the conventional way.
I'm all for speedy recoverys', but after that second article, I'd prefer to see Hase finish his career than play a game here and there, because of ongoing knee problems.
Enjoy the year off Hazelnuts!
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom