Organized them according to DOB and games played
Then columns showing best and secondary team role
Dark blue is first role average or better. Light blue not so great or back-up
Green is secondary Roles. an X is X factor meaning potential to be better than average in future
I also included a best replacement covering already retired or current players over 30
This reinforces my belief that:
----with a couple of exceptions, departed or about to retire players have been\will be covered reasonably well
——with the exception of Lake (frawley) the replacements for departed players have come from an age group at least three years younger
----On the whole, there is coverage in each role through the age groups
getting a look at the players in JLT1 helped enormously putting this together
Then columns showing best and secondary team role
Dark blue is first role average or better. Light blue not so great or back-up
Green is secondary Roles. an X is X factor meaning potential to be better than average in future
I also included a best replacement covering already retired or current players over 30
This reinforces my belief that:
----with a couple of exceptions, departed or about to retire players have been\will be covered reasonably well
——with the exception of Lake (frawley) the replacements for departed players have come from an age group at least three years younger
----On the whole, there is coverage in each role through the age groups
getting a look at the players in JLT1 helped enormously putting this together
Attachments
Last edited:
