0
Amazing that you insist that it has been this way all your life... but it has only affected your ability to comment, now that there is overwhelming evidence against your idiotic position.
A couple of weeks ago?
"It's called priorities" Lawd you never cease to make me piss my pants in laughter Mr.Exe
I have little doubt GG absolutely slays with the ladies, and we are all grateful he sacrifices some of his no doubt valuable time with us on the obscure pages of BigFooty, when he could (and really should) be bringing yet another lady friend to sexual heights she had only dreamed about or read in a woman's lifestyle magazine.
Veteran
10k Posts
Western Bulldogs Board Tipping Champion
Western Bulldogs - Josh Prudden Player Sponsor 2016
Western Bulldogs - Zaine Cordy Player Sponsor 2016
Western Bulldogs - Bailey Dale Player Sponsor 2016
Western Bulldogs - Mitch Honeychurch Player Sponsor 2016
SuperCoach Club Board Championship League Member
Tell them to chase me instead LOL
Just watched the promo clip...looks AWESOME. Can't wait to watch it all...
I mean for all the rhetoric from naysayers and yaysayers, how many people have actually watched with their own eyes the entire apollo telecast? Watching with your own eyes sheds much light. Can get too caught up in the internet textual war. But like, looking with my own eyes again at Aldrin jumping off the ladder and then springing anti-g four foot back up the ladder....you can tell theyre really there. Plus the obvious camera on board filming the luna surface as they approach it, flying miles and miles over it before landing.
Ladies and gentlemen...unless I am mistaken...is this a retraction from GG??
GG.exe lives in a fantasy world - confirmed.
Wouldnt call it a retraction as such. More like my usual constant swinging between belief and disbelef.
You have no idea how not only true but exact to the finest detail the gg.sexe tales are. When males are jealous they react like this. Outrage and disbelief. But go easy on yourselves, men of planet earth, you are but mere mortals.
mate i've got two jobs, a low-key alcohol problem (read: social life) and studies on the boil. believe it or not, i don't have time instantly to sort through junk on the conspiracy board of a footy forum.
Watched a couple of the clips... It's pretty awesome stuff. If you're into this sort of thing (and I am) then this is must watch material.
keep working on your trolling. You're not bad, but not yet at the level of the real pros around here, gg, Pogma et al.
Plus....
Careful on the language sunshine.
very strange that you have doubts over Apollo 11, but none whatsoever on Apollo 8, 10, 12,13,14,15,16 or 17. How have you garnered this world view?
Ok, lets start with photos of the trip shall we. Just over 1000 separate photos documenting their trip.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/projectapolloarchive/albums/72157659051355812
https://www.flickr.com/photos/projectapolloarchive/albums/72157658638144538
https://www.flickr.com/photos/projectapolloarchive/albums/72157659042075710
https://www.flickr.com/photos/projectapolloarchive/albums/72157658629097469
https://www.flickr.com/photos/projectapolloarchive/albums/72157658601662068
https://www.flickr.com/photos/projectapolloarchive/albums/72157657350941603
https://www.flickr.com/photos/projectapolloarchive/albums/72157659257018709
https://www.flickr.com/photos/projectapolloarchive/albums/72157658666156148
Photo of the Apollo 11 landing site, taken from the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) in 2009.
View attachment 277674
There are some really cool ones of 12, 14 and 17, but hey, you dont dispute those landings do you, so they will be of no use in this discussion!
Radio tracking:
The Bochum Radio observatory in Germany (independant, not either soviet nor US) tracked apollo 11:
From an external source:
http://www.honeysucklecreek.net/audio/A11_Landing_Bochum_Net1.mp3
430kb mp3 file.
In this stereo mp3 file, the recording made at Bochum is on theright channel –
and the NASA Net 1 recording (recorded at Honeysuckle, but coming from Goldstone) is on the left channel.
Charlie Duke (Capcom in Houston speaking with the astronauts) – and the associated Quindar tones – are heard only on the leftchannel (i.e. the NASA recording) since Bochum could only hear the transmissions from the Moon – not those being transmittedto the Moon from the tracking stations on Earch.
Bochum and Net 1 recordings synchronised by Colin Mackellar.
*******************
From another external source:
Larry Baysinger was radio technician in Louisville Kentucky, and he tracked apollo 11 too...
taken from: http://legacy.jefferson.kctcs.edu/observatory/apollo11/
Audio files from Baysinger’s tapes. At the time of transfer to digital format the tapes were in storage for 40 years. Only relatively short sections of the tapes contained recognizable material. These have been clipped into easily downloadable clips by Baysinger and are available below. They can be compared to NASA’s transcript of the Apollo 11 landing.
These audio files are very noisy. If your player has an equalizer, it will be easier to hear the audio through all the noise if you reduce the high and low frequencies while boosting the mid-range and keeping the volume low.
Apollo_11_-_2.mp3
Aldrin talking about “angle of departure and velocity”. See page 395 of 633 of the transcript PDF file, first large ALDRIN paragraph. For a video from NASA that includes the same time period, click here.
Apollo_11_-_3.mp3
(2 MB)
Armstrong talking about visibility, then back-and-forth between Armstrong and Aldrin concerning stepping on a cable. See page 395 of 633 of the transcript PDF file, first large ARMSTRONG paragraph.
Apollo_11_-_4.mp3
Aldrin talking about color. See page 395 of 633 of the transcript PDF file, last large ALDRIN paragraph. For a video from NASA that includes the same time period as this and the previous clip,click here.
Apollo_11_-_5.mp3
Aldrin talking about temperature in sunlight vs. in shadow. See page 396 of 633 of the transcript PDF file, first large ALDRIN paragraph. For a video from NASA that includes the same time period,click here. Baysinger remarks that the audio from the tapes does not include the PAO’s comments.[iii]
A11-HighQual.wma
(9 MB)
A11-LowQual.wma
(2 MB)
Complete recording in WMA format (approximately 5 minutes). Click here for a time-indexed transcript of complete recording compiled and annotated by Baysinger in September 2009. Times are measured from the beginning of the WMA file. The first two pages are what is audible on the WMA file. The second two pages are annotated copies of the NASA transcript. Note that while the NASA transcript and NASA audio includes comments from Collins and CAPCOM, along with NASA's PAO voice-over, only Aldrin and Armstrong's voices are audible in the recording. In this regardBaysinger’s recording shows similarities to one made from a German radio observatory (click here).
The Retroreflectors:
Taken from that bastion of internet truth, wikipedia:
Retroreflectors[edit]
AS11-40-5952: Lunar Laser Ranging Experiment as left on the Moon by Apollo 11
Plot of arrival time of photons (Y axis) for each of many laser pulses sent to the Moon (X axis). This data, along with similar data from the other landing sites, shows there are man-made objects on the Moon in the locations of the Apollo landings. Credit: TheAPOLLO (Lunar Laser Ranging) Collaboration
The detection on Earth of reflections from laser ranging retro-reflectors (LRRRs, or mirrors used as targets for Earth-based tracking lasers) on Lunar Laser Ranging experiments left on the Moon is evidence of landings.[31][32][33][34]
AS14-67-9386: Retroflector left on the Moon by Apollo 14
Quoting from James Hansen's biography of Neil Armstrong, First Man: The Life of Neil A. Armstrong:
"For those few misguided souls who still cling to the belief that the Moon landings never happened, examination of the results of five decades of LRRR experiments should evidence how delusional their rejection of the Moon landing really is."[35]
The NASA-independent Observatoire de la Côte d'Azur, McDonald, Apache Point, and Haleakalā observatories regularly use the Apollo LRRR.[36] Lick Observatory attempted to detect from Apollo 11's retroreflector while Armstrong and Aldrin were still on the Moon but did not succeed until August 1, 1969.[37] The Apollo 14 astronauts deployed a retroreflector on February 5, 1971, and McDonald Observatory detected it the same day. The Apollo 15 retroreflector was deployed on July 31, 1971, and was detected by McDonald Observatory within a few days.[38]
The image on the left shows what is considered some of the most unambiguous evidence. This experiment repeatedly fires a laser at the Moon, at the spots where the Apollo landings were reported. The dots show when photons are received from the Moon. The dark line shows that a large number come back at a specific time, and hence were reflected by something quite small (well under a metre in size). Photons reflected from the surface come back over a much broader range of times (the whole vertical range of the plot corresponds to only 30 metres or so in range). The concentration of photons at a specific time appears when the laser is aimed at the Apollos 11, 14 or 15 landing sites; otherwise the expected featureless distribution is observed.[39] The Apollo reflectors are still in use.[40]
Strictly speaking, although the reflectors are strong evidence that human-manufactured artifacts currently exist on the Moon, and their locations are consistent with NASA's claims, they do not prove humans have visited the Moon. Smaller retroreflectors were carried by the unmanned landers Lunokhod 1 and Lunokhod 2. The Lunokhod 2 reflector has been in use since 1973.[40] The location of Lunokhod 1 was unknown for nearly 40 years but it was rediscovered in 2010 in photographs by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) and its retroreflector is now in use. Both the United States and the USSR had the capability to soft-land objects on the surface of the Moon for several years before that. The USSR successfully landed its first unmanned probe (Luna 9) on the Moon in February 1966, and the United States followed with Surveyor 1 in June 1966, but no unmanned landers carried retroreflectors before Lunokhod 1 in November 1970.
*********************************
Did you need me to go on? Has this "Clown" given you enough evidence yet?
look at this stupid ******* thing:
lol............
