Star.
The Carey of his time.
No footy pundit has true credibility without an informed knowledge of Nash's deeds.
My step fathers father (94) always raves about him. By all reports he is very much underrated when people talk of great players.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Round 11
The Golden Ticket - MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
Star.
The Carey of his time.
No footy pundit has true credibility without an informed knowledge of Nash's deeds.
One thing to note is that the 'talls' of yesteryear weren't actually that tall by modern standards, so you'd need to reposition them.
'Big Nick' John Nicholls, Carlton great and resting ruckman in the AFL team of the century was only 189cm tall ( and 108KG!!! )
Neil Balme, Richmond ruckman in the 70's was 194cm. - these days he might make it as a key forward, but he's at the short end for that.
Royce Hart, one of the greatest CHF to play the game was 187cm & 89Kg. About an average midfielders size these days.
Jack Dyer, a great player and dominant ruckman of the 30's and 40's was 185cm.
My step fathers father (94) always raves about him. By all reports he is very much underrated when people talk of great players.
My step fathers father (94) always raves about him. By all reports he is very much underrated when people talk of great players.
I've asked a fair few old fellas in my time who was the greatest footballer they'd seen, and many of them say "Nash" before I can finish the question. Admittedly, I knew little about him at the time, but they all say he could play everywhere and was completely unstoppable.
Supposedly his best football was actually whilst playing for Camberwell in the VFA where he was outrageously dominant.
Also has the bigger honour of having a rhyming slang term named in his honour:
Laurie Nash = Cash
A few cricketers have it (ie. David Gower = Shower, Rodney Hogg = Bog), but not too many footy players have that claim to fame!
Chris Mew and Michael Tuck.
The counter to that is that many, many great players from WA and SA stayed in their state leagues to play their footy, instead of coming to the VFL. The fact that Adelaide, West Coast, Fremantle and Port Adelaide were all reasonably competitive in their first seasons (each winning between 8-11 games), despite the majority of their squads being plucked from the state league, supports this. I think the fact that the AFL now draws every top quality player from around the country offsets the fact that there are a few more teams in the modern era.
I don't have the resources to do this, but I reckon if someone went back to check the players in the VFL in the mid 80s, compared to now, there'd be 5-10 times more players from the non-Victorian states. It's not like football has dropped off the radar down here. The talent pool is deeper, because it's a national league now.
The only rule Lethal would struggle with would be the head high bumps. He would still be dominate player today
Another player - Jason Dunstall would love the new "Arm chops" and push in the back rules - how many times did full backs of the past give the opposite number a gentle push so that there run at the ball would be thwarted. Today that would be a free kick - both he and Lockett may have come close to kicking 1500 goals throughout there careers.
The Krakour brothers would walk into any current teams starting 18.
People forget how good Dipper was
Colin Robertson
The Great Leon Baker
Also has the bigger honour of having a rhyming slang term named in his honour:
Laurie Nash = Cash
A few cricketers have it (ie. David Gower = Shower, Rodney Hogg = Bog), but not too many footy players have that claim to fame!
Many, many great? I think you wanna tone down your hyperbole a little. It would more likely be: a few great, several good and many average. It's fairly widely acknowledged that the VFL was THE comp to show off your wares and so the vast majority of GREAT players either wanted to come, or were lured to, the big stage.
And both of your other stats don't counter the argument anyway. By the time Adelaide, West Coast, Fremantle and Port Adelaide joined the comp, the diluting effect is in play, so naturally they were competitive. There was even an embargo on Victorian teams recruiting kids from their states if I remember correctly (don't people regularly accuse West Coast of having a virtual "state" team initially?).
And, the fact that there is fully 1/3 more players playing senior footy now means that there are more playing from every state, Victoria included.
Congrats
An Essendon supporter giving us the 83 Norm Smith winner despite the Tim Watson connection.
My Essendon supporting mate still refuses to have his name mentioned.
FB: Collins - Langford - Moore
HB: Jencke - Knights - Tuck
Ce: Pritchard - Jarman - Eade
HF: Buckenara - M. Robran - Hall
FF: Loveridge - Salmon - Brereton
Ru: G. Dear
RR: Matthews
Ro: Platten
I/C: Dipper, Greene, Lekkas + J Kennedy Jnr
I'll say it again: Many, many great players either stayed out of Victoria altogether, or played several seasons of footy in their prime in SA/WA/Tas. This simply would not happen today.
I'll see if I'm following the 'diluted league logic': West Coast diluted the league, because they entered it (along with Brisbane) and won half their games in their debut season? Is that the reasoning?
Check the percentages of total players of Victorian origin in the AFL now, compared to the percentage of Victorian players 25 years ago. My guess is the difference would be about 50-60% these days, compared to 90%+ back then.
I could be wrong, but weren't lists much bigger than 42 players back in those days as well?
Dunstall kicked 500 goals after pushing his opponent in the back. Would still be a champion today though.Jason Dunstall would love the new "Arm chops" and push in the back rules - how many times did full backs of the past give the opposite number a gentle push so that there run at the ball would be thwarted. Today that would be a free kick - both he and Lockett may have come close to kicking 1500 goals throughout there careers.
You seem to be forgetting that 30 years ago the population was 12 million and now it's 22 million. The talent pool has doubled but the number of teams hasn't, so all things being equal 22 teams worth of talent are playing for 16 sides, i.e. it's actually about 7-8 players in each team (of 20) back then who wouldn't get a game now.You folks seem to be forgetting that you are also now watching a competition that is diluted with the addition of 4 extra teams. That's the equivalent of each team losing 1/3 of it's playing list. Therefore, each team is fielding at least 7 players today who wouldn't have even got a game in the era most of you are referring to.
I'm sorry dude, but 17 does not equal many, many unless we have different measuring sticks. Please remember that you used the word "great". And I don't see how bringing up players who made the switch helps your argument.
FB: Collins - Langford - Moore
HB: Jencke - Knights - Tuck
Ce: Pritchard - Jarman - Eade
HF: Buckenara - M. Robran - Hall
FF: Loveridge - Salmon - Brereton
Ru: G. Dear
RR: Matthews
Ro: Platten
I/C: Dipper, Greene, Lekkas + J Kennedy Jnr
come off it C-L-A those guys wouldnt get a game these days........
well ok maybe 3 or 4 would miss, but the rest would not......huh ??
no ayres ?
g dear in the ruck LOL - on the back of one game yeah ?