- Thread starter
- #1,301
Then digs into the Crows again
Kossie Pickett and someone by the name of Spargo.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Then digs into the Crows again
That's nice in theory, but (few) people are going to jump sports. As for saying you're going to change the team you follow because they play dour shit and others don't. If we went that route the 2000 at tomorrows Showdown would be our regular crowd after 2015 - 2019.I do agree though. It's not up to the AFL to interfere with how teams want to play. It's up to the audience. If we don't like the product, stop supporting it.
Sent from my Nokia 7.2 using Tapatalk
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Plans to allow 10,000 back into sporting venues.
![]()
Crowds of up to 10,000 people to be allowed in stadiums under relaxed coronavirus rules
Thousands of fans would be able to attend sporting events again and limits on the numbers of people in indoor venues would be scrapped under relaxations of coronavirus rules flagged on Friday.www.abc.net.au
He[Morrison] said, 'states and territories were on track to implement the changes in July'.
It will be interesting to see how the clubs handle that. How will they ration 10,000 seats per match out among 40,000 members? You would think it would have to be some sort of rotation system so that every season ticket holder gets a chance to see a few games.
With the border changes and 10,000 crowd limits it looks like SA may be back in business after the hub. The AFL haven't announced the draw after round 5 but if they had a bye then restarted it would be within a day or so of the 20th July.
What Morrison has permitted is 25% capacity at stadiums with a capacity of <40,000. Under questioning about larger stadiums, eg MCG, Adelaide Oval, Marvel, he said that they were currently excluded while they worked through issues around staffing, transport, entry etc but that he foresees these stadiums being permitted to host games in the near future, in line with the relevant state regulations.FOOTNOTE: What Morrison actually said was, 'For up to 25% of crowd capacity at those venues.' That could mean crowds of 25,000 at the MCG
What Morrison has permitted is 25% capacity at stadiums with a capacity of >40,000. Under questioning about larger stadiums, eg MCG, Adelaide Oval, Marvel, he said that they were currently excluded while they worked through issues around staffing, transport, entry etc but that he foresees these stadiums being permitted to host games in the near future, in line with the relevant state regulations.
Does this mean that these stadiums cannot admit more than 10K, or that state regulations will determine this? I don't know, it was all left up in the air. I guess we'll find out next week?
What Morrison has permitted is 25% capacity at stadiums with a capacity of >40,000. Under questioning about larger stadiums, eg MCG, Adelaide Oval, Marvel, he said that they were currently excluded while they worked through issues around staffing, transport, entry etc but that he foresees these stadiums being permitted to host games in the near future, in line with the relevant state regulations.
Does this mean that these stadiums cannot admit more than 10K, or that state regulations will determine this? I don't know, it was all left up in the air. I guess we'll find out next week?
Wait until it's a 'big name' player and the AFL conveniently relax the draconian regulations
I'd put a fair whack of money on that
I do agree though. It's not up to the AFL to interfere with how teams want to play. It's up to the audience. If we don't like the product, stop supporting it.
Sent from my Nokia 7.2 using Tapatalk
To be fair though if you are going to play the racist card you should at least agree to meet with the other party to resolve the issues so that all parties can move forward. Apparently Lumumba wants an apology but will not meet with Collingwood and under those circumstances it is a bit hard to reconcile and re educate. If what Lumumba says is true then there are no excuses but if you want to change things for the better you have to be prepared to talk.
Disrespecting past legends and arguably one of their best ever players of the club nothing out of the ordinary from a poorly run AFL club.
Collingwood wants to meet him privately so they can manage the PR. He knows that.
They need to publicly apologise, without any caveats, for the relationship to heal.
Same applies to McCleod and the Crows.
... and Betts and the Crows
... and Cameron and the Crows
... and Ellis-Yolmen and the Crows
... etc
Wow. The resurrection of Tim's son has started. What a ridiculous nepotistic shit show the VFL is.
Reckon Danger has been on for 9 out of the past 12 minutes.