Remove this Banner Ad

Random things on your mind.. (cont..)

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Because clearly all beliefs are rational and logically formed.

You've never encountered jealousy before in your entire life? Seriously? When women are involved, the 'belief' or 'impression' a man may be under has no credibility what so ever. Nothing in anything youve claimed is actually not explainable under an alternative theory. Example..

Rann strikes up a friendship with a waitress of all people - 'A waitress of all people'. Interesting extrapolation Jo. Waitresses are obviously akin to Hookers.
This friendship transforms into numerous phone calls and 100s of text messages. - Yes. A friendship. How many text messages do you send daily, lets not pretend we live in the stone ages.
The Waitress's marriage falls apart - Which could be entirely due to his own personality defects. Rabid jealousy and insecurity for instance.
The husband spends two years trying to get into contact with Rann.-Signs of obsession? Jealousy?
The husband taps Rann with a magazine - A friendly way of putting a form of criminal assault.
Waitress claims affair- Husband is now charged with assault. Woman claims to want reconcilation. What credibility does she have?


Ive ignored the stuff about Ranns admissions etc, because hes a politician. We all know they manage the media in an attempt to control the light in which issues are portrayed/covered. That in itself doesnt constitute evidence of anything.

See, its your rabid and bordering on blind acceptance of everything Phillips has spouted that makes me wonder about your agenda, because i know you're not stupid enough to be unable to fathom the concept that people can act irrationally. Ive dealt with the jealous boyfriends of girls ive been friends with before. If one of them writes me letters, tries to ring me etc accusing me of something, i tend to not communicate back. Even more so if its a jealous ex. Maybe they should take a swing at me for daring to allow their fragile egos to be hurt.

I don't understand?

So you're saying Phillips is jealous of the friendship between Rann and Chantelois but is not jealous of an affair he assumed they were having?

It seems to me that the only difference we have in opinion is that you think the affair was a fabrication made up after the assualt and I think that the affair actually occurred or was a fabrication of Chantelois well before the assault.

Either way I suppose it'll all out in the court case conveniently timed after the election;)

If you want evidence of the blokes arrogance, just look at his actions. Anyone who thinks they can assault the head of Government within a state, and get away with it clearly has some issues of arrogance.

I would say that it's more an irrational act than an arrogant one. As you've pointed out it was an act out of jealousy and anger.

These two would much more clearly correlate with irrationality than arrogance.

I mean lets face it, if it was arrogance it would have been at least a little bit pre-planned and thought out. Not hitting a bloke with a rolled up magazine he found lying about ...
 
I don't understand?

So you're saying Phillips is jealous of the friendship between Rann and Chantelois but is not jealous of an affair he assumed they were having?

It seems to me that the only difference we have in opinion is that you think the affair was a fabrication made up after the assualt and I think that the affair actually occurred or was a fabrication of Chantelois well before the assault.

I didnt say what i believe his assumptions were, merely that i dont believe its impossible that they were unjustified.

I am very hesitant to take her at word value about it now however, given the circumstances she and her husband find themselves in. There are many interests she would hold in potentially fabricating the story to supposedly confirm his suspicions now, not limited to his pending court case, and the money.



I would say that it's more an irrational act than an arrogant one. As you've pointed out it was an act out of jealousy and anger.

These two would much more clearly correlate with irrationality than arrogance.

I mean lets face it, if it was arrogance it would have been at least a little bit pre-planned and thought out. Not hitting a bloke with a rolled up magazine he found lying about ...

Arrogance and irrationality arent mutually exclusive. They frequently go hand in hand.

BTW, i disagree with you about the choice of weapon. Ive got the strange suspicion that its choosing was actually very clever. You can do a suprising amount of damage with one tightly rolled, yet the initial impression its use has created on most people was humour.
 
On a completely different topic, I just wanted to say HELL YES - printing out three copies of my thesis ready for submission on friday. My Christ it feels good to get this bloody thing done :thumbsu:


No doubt there are still a billion errors in it but there's only so often you can go over the same work over and over and over again.


Now for the fun part - getting to waste almost a 1000 pages of good quality paper from the University printing three copies of it :D
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

I think it's fair to say that Phillips clearly thought that Rann & Chantelois were having an affair and that his perception of this probably played a large role in the ending of their marriage. His actions in clobbering Rann with a magazine make this plain.

Whether or not his suspicions have any basis in fact is another matter entirely. It's basically a case of he-said-she-said and nobody outside the two of them will probably ever know the truth.

The reason Ch7 got into trouble was because that they insinuated that his alleged affair with Chantelois compromised his ability to do his job as Premier of the state. They were forced to withdraw all of their allegations along these lines. Notably though, the allegation that the two of them had an affair has NOT been withdrawn.

If Rann DID sleep with her, then he has lied to the South Australian public and he will be judged accordingly at the ballot box. If she's lying and they never slept together, then Rann is telling the truth and has no case to answer. Who is telling the truth? Your guess is as good as mine. People with Liberal leanings will probably choose to believe her. People with Labor leanings will tend to give Rann the benefit of the doubt. I no longer live in SA, so I really don't care one way or the other.
 
On a completely different topic, I just wanted to say HELL YES - printing out three copies of my thesis ready for submission on friday. My Christ it feels good to get this bloody thing done :thumbsu:


No doubt there are still a billion errors in it but there's only so often you can go over the same work over and over and over again.


Now for the fun part - getting to waste almost a 1000 pages of good quality paper from the University printing three copies of it :D

That's insane.
And you shouldn't read over your own work anyway because you usually miss mistakes since you know what's written there so you read what you think you wrote & easily read past mistakes so you need to get someone else to read through it.
Shotgun that it's NOT me :p
And well done on finishing it :thumbsu:
 
The reason Ch7 got into trouble was because that they insinuated that his alleged affair with Chantelois compromised his ability to do his job as Premier of the state. They were forced to withdraw all of their allegations along these lines. Notably though, the allegation that the two of them had an affair has NOT been withdrawn.


Of course the allegations he interfered and got her fired is far far easier to disprove than the allegations that their meetings turned sexual.
 
And you don't open yourself up to possible perjury charges;)

Again, as a law student i would have thought you could understand the tactical decisions on why a person may choose to pursue action in one area rather than another without considering it an admission of guilt.
 
That's insane.
And you shouldn't read over your own work anyway because you usually miss mistakes since you know what's written there so you read what you think you wrote & easily read past mistakes so you need to get someone else to read through it.
Shotgun that it's NOT me :p
And well done on finishing it :thumbsu:

Appreciate it :thumbsu:


And yeah, I've been blessed because I've had some seriously good proofreaders going over it the whole time. My supervisors have been fine-toothed combing it and my fiancee finished a PhD on a very similar topic around a year ago so she's been fantastic is helping me get all the problems ironed out. Compared to a friend of mine, for whom every single word in her thesis has been written, checked, and finalised entirely by her, I've been really lucky.

You are right though - I think it's after the third time they say you don't notice any more mistakes :eek:

It's at the binders today, picking it up tomorrow afternoon, you beauty :thumbsu: Just finished burning up the CDs to go with it too. Time to celebrate :D
 

Remove this Banner Ad

On a completely different topic, I just wanted to say HELL YES - printing out three copies of my thesis ready for submission on friday. My Christ it feels good to get this bloody thing done :thumbsu:


No doubt there are still a billion errors in it but there's only so often you can go over the same work over and over and over again.


Now for the fun part - getting to waste almost a 1000 pages of good quality paper from the University printing three copies of it :D

Can't believe I missed this. Son of a bitch! Well done mate. I might need to ask you to delete my BF account in these last few months hahaha. Or I should just bite the bullet and lock myself in the wilderness with a stack of books.
 
Can't believe I missed this. Son of a bitch! Well done mate. I might need to ask you to delete my BF account in these last few months hahaha. Or I should just bite the bullet and lock myself in the wilderness with a stack of books.

Appreciate it dude :thumbsu: Believe me, it's no coincidence my BF time has decreased markedly in the last couple of months :D I certainly won't miss the 3AM drives home from Uni now that this little period is over.


STO - if that's the worst mistake I make I'll be laughing :p
 
Of course the allegations he interfered and got her fired is far far easier to disprove than the allegations that their meetings turned sexual.


Unless she kept the dress of course.;)

Anyone caught out, first does the old "deny,deny,deny' and he did that realy well. If he lied , different thing. I don't want Premiers lying about anything.
I wish Clinton had been able to stay on... only because he bit the bullet and admitted it eventually ...Tiger is just as good a golfer...... Carey , well a mate's wife is a bit off.... but still.
 
On the Carey thing, the emotional issue people have is mostly that it was Anthony's wife, but from my point of view the biggest issue is that he cheated on his wife. Anthony's wife was a consensual partner.


I know you don't do the dirty by your mates, but somehow to me, the adultery is the big one. Who it's with is small by comparison.
 
Unless she kept the dress of course.;)

Anyone caught out, first does the old "deny,deny,deny' and he did that realy well. If he lied , different thing. I don't want Premiers lying about anything.
I wish Clinton had been able to stay on... only because he bit the bullet and admitted it eventually ...Tiger is just as good a golfer...... Carey , well a mate's wife is a bit off.... but still.

Not sure what you’re implying but William Jefferson "Bill" Clinton didn’t leave office as the 42nd president of the United States because he was impeached on a sex scandal. He served his 2 consecutive terms in office and that is the maximum time anyone can be president of the USA.

1993 -2001.
 
Not sure what you’re implying but William Jefferson "Bill" Clinton didn’t leave office as the 42nd president of the United States because he was impeached on a sex scandal. He served his 2 consecutive terms in office and that is the maximum time anyone can be president of the USA.

1993 -2001.

I know that ...and it's a stupid thing they got happening there. If it were different, their bad ones would be kicked out anyway and the good ones get to stay. I realise it's in their Constitution but imagine if JFK had been around longer than he was and was then ousted because of it after 8 years. Getting rid of someone who is outstanding at his job because of a "tenure" issue does not sit well with me.

Kennedy was a bit of a lad, Clinton , bit of a lad.....but both good presidents.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Thank goodness for Foxtel's winter Olympic coverage - they actually show LIVE events.

I can't believe Channel 9 chose to continue the Today show instead of showing Torah Bright's qualification run in the Ladies Halfpipe.

For the record Bright has qualified for the final in 1st place with a score of 45.8! Holly Crawford was pipped for direct qualification, finishing 7th with a score of 39.5 (she will lead the semi-finals though, so we could have 2 Aussies in the final woohoo!)

If you want to follow the event Live, you can here - http://www.vancouver2010.com/olympi...nowboard-cross-qualification_sbw490900aX.html - semis are on about 10:30am, the finals start at about 12:30pm (and 9 will probably have Ellen on instead :( )

Also, Eddie's in a bit of hot water over his opinion of some of the figure skating outfits.
 
Be fair, channel 9 have actually been quite good this year. Maybe it the low expectations they ahve offered in the past but this year they have superseded those, they have been good.
 
On the Carey thing, the emotional issue people have is mostly that it was Anthony's wife, but from my point of view the biggest issue is that he cheated on his wife. Anthony's wife was a consensual partner.


I know you don't do the dirty by your mates, but somehow to me, the adultery is the big one. Who it's with is small by comparison.


Geez stabby...with your mate's wife is a double betrayal though. I would bet that most fellas would be maybe more shattered to think that a mate did that rather than their wife hooked up with someone they didn't know.

Could be wrong though.

And she got off scott free...that was just wrong.
 
Be fair, channel 9 have actually been quite good this year. Maybe it the low expectations they ahve offered in the past but this year they have superseded those, they have been good.

Really - they chose the Today show instead of Australia's best Gold Medal chance.

The other night I flicked over to 9's coverage on 4 or 5 occasions - 3 times it was Eddie rambling on and the other two times were ad breaks.

Foxtel, on the other hand, show events in full (often ad free) and their presenters aren't dominating the broadcast.
 
Really - they chose the Today show instead of Australia's best Gold Medal chance.

The other night I flicked over to 9's coverage on 4 or 5 occasions - 3 times it was Eddie rambling on and the other two times were ad breaks.

Foxtel, on the other hand, show events in full (often ad free) and their presenters aren't dominating the broadcast.

I’m not saying Channel 9 >>>> foxtel coverage.

But for a free to air coverage, channel 9 are far superior to anything we have experienced in he past in regards to free to air.

Trace Holmes and Adam Peacock have been excellent.
 
Could be wrong though.

And she got off scott free...that was just wrong.

Just because she wasn’t guilty by the media, doesn’t mean she got of scot free. I’m sure with her marriage breaking up and losing many, many close friends trust – she hasn’t got off scot free.

Just saying.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Similar threads

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top