Charlie Gardiner didn't play, he was on Michael Gardiner.
Ahhh, Gehrrig and Blake pulled out.
Charlie Gardner played and Leo played on him.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Charlie Gardiner didn't play, he was on Michael Gardiner.

I actually thought Leo did a very good job last night. He played attacking footy and didn't even get pinged for holding the ball once, which last year happened alot when he did all his weaving and stuff. Although he was playing on a much younger guy (C. Gardiner) he didn't get left behind, infact he was the one who was constantly breaking away and getting free.
What happened to Bird?
He made that one mistake and then I didn't see him for the rest of the night?
Did roos put him on the bench for the rest of the night?
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Leo Barry's retirement will be a joyfull occasion....
Leo was ordinary. He got free and well in the clear but backtracked to for inside kick or handpass hence most of his disposals were under pressure. He handpassed to players under the pump and most times unnecessarily. It gets me how he can be so much on his own yet get himself into doibolical trouble. He deliberately ignored a player on the wing who was 100 yards in the clear, he looked in his direction but preferred to go across the ground the ground with a pi55y 20 metre pass to nothing.
He has no lateral vision and I suspect he didnt even see the player. Why doesn't he just put it to the square. Conclusion....thick as a brick.
I don't agree. I think he did well with the majority of his disposals. I know at times he does put himself and his teammates under more pressure then need be, but i didn't feel that was the case last night. As for the incident you're talking about, i can't remember it so i can't comment. He does need to watch what he's doing though, he did go for the weave a few times last night and almost got himself in some trouble.
Jude Bolton is not getting of the hook from me. So much for his more in and under declaration. Again didn't affect a centre clearance. Not a midfielders bum, 3 kicks 7 handpasses.
Changed his hair colour in the hope that people will not notice how crap he is.
How can any side go with this inept excuse of a footballer ahead of Jack, Moore and Bird at centre bounces or in the side at that.
Hardness, what a myth. He goes to ground with regular manotony and is often last to a pack on the ground. He overran the ball 3 times at centre bounces and clearly looked like he crapped himself.
That article about him not being unprofessional last year and fit and ready to go now appears to me to be a fluff piece by the club to try to motivate him, after giving him a pay rise. Unfit my rectum, he is no good.
Can't see how he's getting a game over Mathews, Benny at least has a job to do and does it well, he could've shut down Dal or Harvs last night as he has done every time against the Saints in the last 4-5 years. Jude is just a floater, people may call him in and under but he gets in there to lock in ball ups around the ground and can't keep up with reading the play and gets left behind until we lock it in again.nico said:Jude Bolton is not getting of the hook from me. So much for his more in and under declaration. Again didn't affect a centre clearance. Not a midfielders bum, 3 kicks 7 handpasses.
Changed his hair colour in the hope that people will not notice how crap he is.
How can any side go with this inept excuse of a footballer ahead of Jack, Moore and Bird at centre bounces or in the side at that.
Hardness, what a myth. He goes to ground with regular manotony and is often last to a pack on the ground. He overran the ball 3 times at centre bounces and clearly looked like he crapped himself.
That article about him not being unprofessional last year and fit and ready to go now appears to me to be a fluff piece by the club to try to motivate him, after giving him a pay rise. Unfit my rectum, he is no good.
He went the weave every time and you clearly weren't watching the game to any level of analysis.
He went to weave about 3 times, but got away with it everytime. Well except maybe once. I can remember him weaving and then having to handball it back to someone under pressure. For me though, his attacking nature outweighs the other stuff. I rather have someone in the team who is attacking and taking risks then not attacking and just kicking it backwards constantly.
Its also frustrating to see our guys not wanting to play on quickly. I know they love pinpointing their passes, but by taking so long to dispose of the ball, they simply created heavy traffic for our forwards. I would have loved to see a one on one contest between Hall and his opponent rather than Hall with 3 saints around him, courtesy to our slow movement of the ball.

(Now if we can just convince him to a take a shot when he marks it 40 out directly in front rather than kicking it to a struggling rookie in a poor position we could be looking at an exciting year from the big fella).![]()
He went the weave every time and you clearly weren't watching the game to any level of analysis.
Was very high contact.what was the descision against mattner late in the 3rd where he was going for a mark, and a stkilda player was running with the flight of the ball they collided and the stkilda player got a free?
I agree with MSG here, I love a new recruit to show skills - Jack's kicking was superb - better than many experienced players. He will be a gun.
Bad Luck re: close match
The Swans never actually got to the lead, but any match with a margin of 2 points could have gone either way.
The highlight for Sydney was clearly the performance of Jack. His bump on Xavier Clarke was brilliant.
Craig Bird looks a long way off though. I think most here are expecting too much of a guy who was passed over by every team in the comp.

