A11dAtP0w3R
Dumpster Fire Diver
- Oct 18, 2013
- 89,349
- 125,778
- AFL Club
- Melbourne
- Other Teams
- Carolina Panthers
Well at least we've found the reason!
Stupid kids. I'll be sure the give the boy a dead arm and say that was from Uncle Headless.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Well at least we've found the reason!
me too!! not missing another one, ever!!!Didn't wach the game this week, and we lose , is this the reverse of last year?
We’ve got next week to look forward toEven in the last 5 seconds we had a chance if Jackson punched it towards goal rather than low percentage mark.
Oh well it's done. Time to move on.
Dees played well and it was a good game. Dees will be top 4 come seasons end unlike your sorry club. Crows have now beaten more top 4 teams than port this year for context.WOW. what a steal. as a neutral it looked like a fix. at the 7.50 mark my mate said the fix is on. then three more astounding decisions/ non decisions and the crows are home. never posted on demons page but it looked like a fix from 3 neutrals.
The week after isn't much better. Lions looking ominous.We’ve got next week to look forward to
WOW. what a steal. as a neutral it looked like a fix. at the 7.50 mark my mate said the fix is on. then three more astounding decisions/ non decisions and the crows are home. never posted on demons page but it looked like a fix from 3 neutrals.
God I hate this sh*t every year with you SA w***ers. Go to your own boards and shitfight with each other.
It's the Melbourne board, * off campaigneryou sound nice
Umpiring mistakes are one thing and most level headed football fans accept that.
Umpires shitting themselves and putting away the whistle in the dying minutes of a cliffhanger, with a hometown crowd is a completely different thing.
It's amazing how often the two are confused
Imagine if u weren’t trying to be a campaigner . You’d still be a campaignerUmpire had a better view than the original angle and the ball was off Spargo. Imagine if a player deflected a handpass out of bounds and won due to it, seems to be what most ppl wanted.
Umpire had a better view than the original angle and the ball was off Spargo. Imagine if a player deflected a handpass out of bounds and won due to it, seems to be what most ppl wanted.
For me it was the non paying of holding the ball up the other end that ended up in the crows taking the lead that was the bad umpire mistake . From the camera angle we have seen it looks deliberate out of bounds , but why did non of the demon players close by appeal , they normally go up like a boy band .Fair play if true. Anyone have video that shows the ball deflect of spargs?
For me it was the non paying of holding the ball up the other end that ended up in the crows taking the lead that was the bad umpire mistake . From the camera angle we have seen it looks deliberate out of bounds , but why did non of the demon players close by appeal , they normally go up like a boy band .
Anyway we lost because we shat the bed in the last 5 min.
It's the Melbourne board, fu** off campaigner
Beat me to it.God I hate this sh*t every year with you SA w***ers. Go to your own boards and shitfight with each other.
Why do you think the Melbourne players didn't appeal for deliberate? But did anyone noticed the finger clearly bent off Sholl when the goal was kicked and the vision was only review for a few second?Fair play if true. Anyone have video that shows the ball deflect of spargs?
Why do you think the Melbourne players didn't appeal for deliberate? But did anyone noticed the finger clearly bent off Sholl when the goal was kicked and the vision was only review for a few second?
No it was clearly touch, you can see the finger bent back. Did you watch that footage of the "deliberate"?Dee's players don't usually whinge too much for frees compared to other teams (looking at you, buddy!), especially not for deliberate.
Sholl"""touch"""" wasn't touched, watch the replay again. Back to your board now
The AFL insist on using 30fps cameras from miles away, the blur and lack of frames shows nothing conclusive about it being touched. the rules have been the same on that front since they brought in the ARC, have you watched much footy lately?No it was clearly touch, you can see the finger bent back. Did you watch that footage of the "deliberate"?
Doesn't change direction? There will be no please explain from the AFL (like they did for the Brisbane and Geelong game) as they will see this vision and it was the correct call since the handball deflected off Spargo hand and even he didn't appeal for deliberate as Doedee was chasing the ball to the boundary line because the handball was meant for him before Spargo deflected the ball. And you do know it doesn't matter if the bending of the finger is blurred vision as it physically impossible to bend your finger back that far, that's why a lot of goal are overturn on the blur vision of finger bending back.The AFL insist on using 30fps cameras from miles away, the blur and lack of frames shows nothing conclusive about it being touched. the rules have been the same on that front since they brought in the ARC, have you watched much footy lately?
Yes i did, ball doesn't change direction. The positioning the umpire was in, he should've paid it. With slow-mo and alternate angles it shows a 50:50 call. Not the end of the world, just frustrating when it goes against you. Hope (but doubt) to see you in the finals
Enjoy the win mate, youDoesn't change direction? There will be no please explain from the AFL (like they did for the Brisbane and Geelong game) as they will see this vision and it was the correct call since the handball deflected off Spargo hand and even he didn't appeal for deliberate as Doedee was chasing the ball to the boundary line because the handball was meant for him before Spargo deflected the ball. And you do know it doesn't matter if the bending of the finger is blurred vision as it physically impossible to bend your finger back that far, that's why a lot of goal are overturn on the blur vision of finger bending back.
I'm sure you'll get a much better reception if you go back to your board and post about this stuff. Perhaps leave it up to our posters to decide if we want to talk about it.Doesn't change direction? There will be no please explain from the AFL (like they did for the Brisbane and Geelong game) as they will see this vision and it was the correct call since the handball deflected off Spargo hand and even he didn't appeal for deliberate as Doedee was chasing the ball to the boundary line because the handball was meant for him before Spargo deflected the ball. And you do know it doesn't matter if the bending of the finger is blurred vision as it physically impossible to bend your finger back that far, that's why a lot of goal are overturn on the blur vision of finger bending back.