TONYC3163
Club Legend
- Jul 7, 2024
- 1,101
- 2,812
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
Yep37.5% DE is not an impact player.
Finn is an endurance machine. I've made my point previously, he either plays as a stopper who tires out his opponent or he doesn't play at all.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Yep37.5% DE is not an impact player.
Finn is an endurance machine. I've made my point previously, he either plays as a stopper who tires out his opponent or he doesn't play at all.
If we had an impact player, he'd be starting37.5% DE is not an impact player.
Finn is an endurance machine. I've made my point previously, he either plays as a stopper who tires out his opponent or he doesn't play at all.
that is what’s so frustrating - is that not how we played in the second half of last year?Reminds me of Sam's quote earlier last year. Sometimes the way we play we make it easy for the opposition to apply pressure.
Collingwood and Brisbane for contrast make it very hard to apply pressure as when they win the ball they go. They take the first option and everyone knows where to spread and they hit their targets and it's very difficult to stop.
We have guys win the ball then ignoring options and getting tackled. We kick inboard to a flat footed Morrison in a 2v1.
We switch the play with a high slow kick to the hbf that gets cut off.
When they turn turn it over to us in the middle of the ground we stand there, kick sideways, then handball then kick to 40m out in the corridor to Dear in a 4v1 with no crumbers. Kick it long a pack in the pocket and worst case scenario they mark it and have to kick over the mark. Best case we mark and goal. Likely scenario is ball comes to ground and we either win a crumb or they are under immense pressure and cannot rebound.
We made some really silly mistakes this match. Players and coaches.


Log in to remove this Banner Ad
I think we are defining impact differently, but for different aspects. I'm talking about the sub (Newcombe is an impact player for your definition).If we had an impact player, he'd be starting
And CJ should be sub. I haven't minded him in that roleI think we are defining impact differently, but for different aspects. I'm talking about the sub (Newcombe is an impact player for your definition).
For the sub, CJ is what I would classify as an impact player.
“Sack the coach”Four quarter football. Don’t blame the tools.
Childish response. Where does our midfield rate compared to the rest of the comp. Top 8 and bottom 8. How do you rate our midfield development of the last two years.“Sack the coach”
“Sack the coach”
Childish response? I literally just gave you a quick summation of what you wrote when you said we needed to get rid of David Hale.Childish response. Where does our midfield rate compared to the rest of the comp. Top 8 and bottom 8. How do you rate our midfield development of the last two years.
Are the coaches/line coaches immune to criticism around here. Are the players the only ones fair game. There's pages and pages on CJ when he fails to stick a tackle in the middle.
We got young midfielders getting dropped midway though a game. Confidences shot.
Fremantle are a great side. We lacked polish.Come home Clarko, I miss you!
They are not great. Decent and played well to win, but if they are great then Hawthorn mustn’t be too far off being great as well. But in reality we are not, we are a developing side that has plateaued a bit due to various factors.Fremantle are a great side. We lacked polish.
They are not great. Decent and played well to win, but if they are great then Hawthorn mustn’t be too far off being great as well. But in reality we are not, we are a developing side that has plateaued a bit due to various factors.
There is a difference between legitimate criticism and over the top saying get rid of a line coach.Childish response. Where does our midfield rate compared to the rest of the comp. Top 8 and bottom 8. How do you rate our midfield development of the last two years.
Are the coaches/line coaches immune to criticism around here. Are the players the only ones fair game. There's pages and pages on CJ when he fails to stick a tackle in the middle.
We got young midfielders getting dropped midway though a game. Confidences shot.
Sorry. I read it quickly and missed the sarcasm
But FrEeKiCkHaWtHoRnYeah, credit to Freo but I tell you what the 10-1 free kicks in the last is pretty hard to swallow when our forwards were man-handled all night long.
Childish response. Where does our midfield rate compared to the rest of the comp. Top 8 and bottom 8. How do you rate our midfield development of the last two years.
Are the coaches/line coaches immune to criticism around here. Are the players the only ones fair game. There's pages and pages on CJ when he fails to stick a tackle in the middle.
We got young midfielders getting dropped midway though a game. Confidences shot.
Nothing you mentioned in your post is as frustrating to me as you continuing to call him Calsher “Deer”.Frustrating loss. I have said all year we are not winning it all this year with this mid-field and I’m absolutely right.
Unbelievably crazy we went after both Barrass and Battle they’re both really good players but we only needed one. We should’ve gone after mid. Back half of last year we had so much space coming out of the backline - this year we have none.
Our mid field is no where near it. Worpel is not good, he needs to go at the end of the year. Only reason he plays is because we have no depth at all in this position at all.
McKenzie - gone backwards completely since his hand injury. Lost so much confidence - I have no concerns about his future but I can’t see it turning around this year.
Sicily was fine I reckon, seemed to struggle overhead a little. But his intent and fight looked really good
Meek awesome - we’d be completely screwed without him. He has a serious chance of going down us one of the top 2 ruckman in our history
Ginny very good. One of the better decision makers - if he was a yard quicker he’d be an A grader.
Scrimshaw has to come in - probably for CJ. He looks very very good at box hill yesterday - can defend, finds good space and is a very good user of the football. Annoys me that Mitch doesn’t fully believe in him
I really don’t think Lewis is going to solve anything - we have looked so slow this year adding a 4th tall into the mix is not going to help us. Gunston and Chol have had great years despite our poor midfield - would be crazy to drop either of them or play Chol out of position; we have seen what ****ing around with positioning has done to Sicily’s game. But I guess we will have to at some point
Deer showed some good-very good signs - does not deserve to be dropped. For Lewis
When our group is on they more than get the job done.
They were good enough to beat the Crows and Dogs.
But mostly, how many teams can cover there best mid without losing potency?
Forgetting Day, consider this:
Mackenzie is playing worse than he did at the start of the year due to injury and then form. Nash has been out injured and suspended, and his performances are still a bit up and down. Worpel has been out injured, then out of form also. Butler added a lot to the group. Then he got injured/sore and is out as well.
Our best performed mids in 2025 are Jai and Ward. One of those is in his infancy as an on-baller.
Notice that pair have played every game?
Could there be a link between getting on the park and everyone's performances I wonder?
Nothing you mentioned in your post is as frustrating to me as you continuing to call him Calsher “Deer”.
So many people have pulled you up on it now, you must be trolling at this point?
I’m not trying to be a smartarse and I am very much normally in the camp of “the club knows best”, but honestly is there anyone on this board who actually thinks Finn being sub is a good idea?Imo, I don't want Finn to impact as a sub, I want him starting and tagging one of the opps best midfielders..
Just take one of the opps best midfielders out of the game.
Once again on Saturday, two of the best 3 on ground (according to the coaches) were two of the oppositions best midfielders. Happens all the time when Finn is sub.
Either start him on the ground as a run with player or don't play him at all.