Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Thought we were beaten by the better side on the night but I was disappointed by Vossy's failure to deal with the Tuohy tag on Zorko. He was playing forward pocket for the majority of the night and was too deep to be part of the action and an easy tag.. It was a no brainer to run him through the middle or off the half back flank at least you force Carlton to lose the impact of a running midfielder or an attacking forward. He is integral to our success. If he gets involved we win. Our non reaction just played into Malthouse's hands.
Elliot yeo...I think is comming along nicely, had another solid night tonight as mentioned earlier he has MOSTLY got rid of those high and up under kicks he use to love so much.
Docherty, every time I saw him come to the side line to be replaced he looked so exhausted, more so then any other player on the park.
Lilse, I mentioned this about him before, BUT at times in contested marking situations instead of trying to mark it, he actually looks to be tapping the ball out, like a ruck contest. He gave nothing in the ruck and from reports out of the ressies big bill longer had a great game, so I feel jordie could be back to the reserves.
This sums up the issue with Vossy. He is a very good spokesperson, appears to have respect of the players, can be an inspirational leader… but he doesn’t appear to be as tactically savvy as other coaches. And that’s ok – not every coach is a mick malthouse. But if Voss is retained at the end of the year the club must ensure they appoint someone to ensure he has that gameday strategic support. At the moment he’s pretty much got a bunch of young blokes and Mark Harvey - who didn’t exactly demonstrate tactical excellence at freo.
Agreed the options were limited but it was not impossible. Straight swap with Mayes off the wing was the most apparent or maybe a rotation through the midfield with Rocky or maybe just put Zorks on Garlett. These were unexplored options. My main point is that we need Zorko involved in the play as much as possible. The real issue goes back to his initial selection as a forward pocket.The little champ is a multiple B&F as a midfielder. That's where he is most damaging.
Gee, Carlton are a very average football team if they can only beat us by such a small margin with 2/3 of our regular defense missing, and on top of that also being down McGrath and Leuenberger at the end as well we would have been steamrolled by any decent team. After we hung in there I was surprised and we were so close at the end. I think that shows guts and determination, to almost pinch a win. A few umpiring decisions going the right way and a few less acts from Murphy (hear Broadway have called him) and we would have won.
We were in disarray as soon as the ball went forward in the first quarter, you could see the guys looking around wondering who was meant to be on who, but all credit to the fill ins, they probably broke even after that first quarter.
We have a hell of a lot more upside than Carlton do in my opinion. It will be nice in the coming years when we beat Carlton during their rebuild by 90+ points regularly, as Judd is almost gone and a few others are close to the end. It feels god to know we are on the rise and you can see it, feel it every game. (Well the last three at least)
As for your more upside comment i totally disagree. By the end of next season the Lions will have
more 30+ aged players than the Blues will so I don't know where you got that argument from.
Carlton are the middle of the road team I reckon but the Blues should have won by a lot more.
You didn't lose Leuenberger till late in the game so I don't think he would of made a difference
in the end. And didn't Mcgrath get subbed off coz he wasn't doing anything? so you didn't actually lose him.
Carlton are a footy side who cant kick straight and that is the only reason Brisbane got close.
Both team have their fare share of injuries so I cant argue either way there.
As for your more upside comment i totally disagree. By the end of next season the Lions will have
more 30+ aged players than the Blues will so I don't know where you got that argument from.
Was an absolute stupid handball and just sad the bloke tweaked his calf as a result.
Are Carazzo, Judd, Scotland, Simpson and Waite all retiring or something?
You can talk as much 'coulda, shoulda' as you want on your own board or the main board - this isn't the place for it.
Apparently Judd is almost gone and a few others are close to the end. I was merely pointing out that the lions have more older players than the Blues have. Fact are Facts.
Are you high?
Both sides missed easy set-shots, so this waffle of us only getting close because of your inaccuracy is horseshit. We lost Leuenberger late in the game when we needed to win the clearances, of course it would have made a difference. McGrath got subbed off because he was injured. Carlton are on the way down and everyone knows it.
Facts are indeed facts. Try posting some next time.
Carlton missed way more easy shots and you know it.
Carlton dominated every stat bar tackles but that happens when you have the ball more than not.
Carlton won the clearances all day with Leuenberger on the field so it wouldn't have mattered.
With a majority of our best 22 aged in their mid 20s or under I think we will be right for a while yet.
I only post the truth.
So there is a strong chance that we could go into this game with all of Merrett, Rich, Brown, Leuenberger, and Golby out. That is our number 1 key defender, our best midfielder, our number 1 key forward, our number 1 Ruckman, and our best small defender all out. Just great.
Whoops I posted that in the wrong thread. Going to be very tough with our best players from literally every position gone.It'll be very interesting at least...still, exactly not what we want with the old jumper against the Pies on a Friday night.
Carlton are the middle of the road team I reckon but the Blues should have won by a lot more.
You didn't lose Leuenberger till late in the game so I don't think he would of made a difference
in the end. And didn't Mcgrath get subbed off coz he wasn't doing anything? so you didn't actually lose him.
Carlton are a footy side who cant kick straight and that is the only reason Brisbane got close.
Both team have their fare share of injuries so I cant argue either way there.
As for your more upside comment i totally disagree. By the end of next season the Lions will have
more 30+ aged players than the Blues will so I don't know where you got that argument from.