
Judge alone trials can happen, but it's rare in Vic.this is the greatest fallacy ever, you can still be tried without a jury and numerous cases have been
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Supercoach Round 10 SC Gameday Talk - SC Trades ,//, AFL Fantasy Round 10 AF Gameday Talk - AF Trades
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Judge alone trials can happen, but it's rare in Vic.this is the greatest fallacy ever, you can still be tried without a jury and numerous cases have been
Long game: it's actually Toby Conway and the alleged has just racked up a traffic violation
I think it’d be best to keep other player names out of this thread for obvious reasons.What was Bews charged with?
I am genuinely interested on what you believe would be the best case for Geelong to have done?people are allowed to question whatever they like, for the millionth time a supression order is about the publication NOTHING to do with whether or not people talk about it and the media are not going to anyway
Listing as a fake finger injury thats just TBC is drawing more attention to it than not listing him
It seems pretty obvious that it is thiswhy is this such a point of contention for you? I understand being appalled at what he has been accused of doing but why are you so hung up on how the AFL has handled the suppression order? Do you even care about the victim or is this just an opportunity for you to point-score against the AFL and Geelong?
edit: just checked and you have 65!! posts in this thread all asking the same question
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
It goes to the heart of Geelong being extremely flexible with the truth regarding its injury reporting. Just say personal matters.
dont say that, you will be berated by the Geelong supporters on here ive been telling them for weeks some have even said he has a finger injury and believe it!
woop de doopYou’ve been berated on here by everyone.
My own (actually) broken finger took a similarly long time to come good.Exactly, most will be thinking "geez must have broken that finger badly"
At the end of the day, if you think you're right then that's all that matters. There are cat people out there that think that being a cat person is completely normal.woop de doop
He's back!dont say that, you will be berated by the Geelong supporters on here ive been telling them for weeks some have even said he has a finger injury and believe it!
so are all the Geelong supporters!He's back!
Yes, because the burden of proof is so high that they can't get to court. That it has a court hearing is serious indeed.
Attrition of sexual offence incidents through the Victorian criminal justice system: 2021 update | Crime Statistics Agency Victoria
This research paper examines how many incidents of sexual offending progress through the justice system to be proven in court. It also examines the most common points that incidents 'exit' the justice system and the characteristics of incidents that progress through each stage.www.crimestatistics.vic.gov.au
this is the greatest fallacy ever, you can still be tried without a jury and numerous cases have been
Thats because its a garbage argument about not getting a fair jury trial, it only takes 1 in your favourThat's not a regular occurrence in Victoria.
The names have been suppressed and almost everyone in here - including the lefties - are in favour. You’ve just come in half ****ing baked hereGeez I wonder what happened to innocent until proven guilty. When it comes to these sort of accusations the names of the parties involved should be suppressed until the case has been decided as even if the accused is found to be innocent there's still lingering stigma attached that can have damaging on-going repercussions in the professional and personal lives of the accused. I know that there's those lefty white knights who think every woman walking on earth is incapable of lying but spitefulness is part of the human condition and there are plenty of vindictive strumpets out there who don't have any problem stooping that low to get even for whatever slight they think they've suffered from a guy.
Thats because its a garbage argument about not getting a fair jury trial, it only takes 1 in your favour
I've read several posts already that have more or less strongly hinted at who it is, doesn't take a rocket surgeon to work it out, and constantly whinging and crying as to why his name can't be out there in the open like accused regular men who don't have a celebrity profile. With one Geelong hating Saint fan blatantly posting his name. * smh *The names have been suppressed and almost everyone in here - including the lefties - are in favour. You’ve just come in half ****ing baked here
I've read several posts already that have more or less strongly hinted at who it is, doesn't take a rocket surgeon to work it out, and constantly whinging and crying as to why his name can't be out there in the open like accused regular men who don't have a celebrity profile. With one Geelong hating Saint fan blatantly posting his name. * smh *
Agree their hands are tied in terms of public comment. I am interested to know whether he’s training and still doing official duties or been stood down behind closed doors? I’d be disappointed if the former.I think Geelong have done the right thing behind closed doors but can’t do anything till this suppression order is over.. Geelong have a link on their website to every single players Instagram in their bio and there is one player who doesn’t have a link to their instagram we can all guess who. I think Geelong is doing all the can with the player with the cards they have been dealt and are doing what they can and can’t do by lawyers
both are ridiculousAre you arguing against the suppression order itself or the Cats' failure to update the injury list?
True in many ways.It may also just be that if it goes public, it will really hurt the chances of getting an impartial jury who are unaware of the player's history as it might pertain to the case, due to the massive amount of press it will get.
Most people won't know Mr Sinnott from a bar of soap, even after his name has been published. If the footballer's name goes public, within the week, almost everyone in Geelong will know who he is and a lot of other facts that they may need to keep from the jury.