Is it a false allegation though? Or one that just can't be prosecuted due to a lack of evidence?This is one of those very rare cases.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Is it a false allegation though? Or one that just can't be prosecuted due to a lack of evidence?This is one of those very rare cases.
Is it a false allegation though? Or one that just can't be prosecuted due to a lack of evidence?
The court heard when he left the witness box a day earlier, a police officer involved in the case followed him outside to make sure he was feeling OK.
During that conversation, Mr Martin confessed he had lied.
“I am sorry. I lied in my police statement. Am I going to get in trouble?” the officer’s notes from the conversation, which were read out in court and Mr Martin agreed were accurate, said.
Under cross-examination by top criminal barrister Hayden Rattray, for Bruhn, Mr Martin then admitted he had little memory of the night and that his police statement was mostly just stating things the complainant had told him.
His bombshell evidence included him admitting the complainant had tried to show him her police statement; and told him she had lied to police even before he gave his police statement.
“(She) told you previously that she lied to the police about the rape allegations?” Mr Rattray asked.
Mr Martin replied: “From my memory, yes’.”
The witness said the complainant wanted him to make a statement that supported hers.
“It wasn’t a direct, ‘you must say this in your statement’, it was, ‘you don’t remember what happened, so here’s what happened’,” he said.
But Mr Martin acknowledged that he now knew parts of it, including how she had told him one of the men had assaulted him outside the club, were “utterly false”.
He told the court he had “no memory of the accused really even being there”.
Is it a false allegation though? Or one that just can't be prosecuted due to a lack of evidence?
Unless the KC is now lying like the hooker and her neurologically challenged friend, we can assume the former.Dermot Dann, KC, for Bruhn, told the court the case had been “a horrible stain on the criminal justice system”.
“When it came to these allegations ... the complainant admitted she had lied,” he said.
There was a case in NSW where a woman had accused her ex husband of raping her but there was CCTV she hadn’t been aware of which showed her enthusiastic participation in sex.Case dropped with complainant and leading prosecution witness admitting to lying. We now know the prosecution long held doubts about the medical and factual evidence but it took the leading prosecution witness to admit in court his story was a complete lie and the complainant had put him up to it.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Victim blamingImagine underpaying a prostitute and then having them extort you for a full fee

But there's no mention of her lying about the actual rape allegations though.Both the accuser and a key witness have been found to have lied to police
Oh Ok.Unless the KC is now lying like the hooker and her neurologically challenged friend, we can assume the former.
We know that she fed information to the witness who admitted to using those lies. Which is at least some form of crime of PCOJ or whatever the legal term is.But there's no mention of her lying about the actual rape allegations though.
As far as we know, she still alleges that it happened.
Not that that matters - just pointing out that some seem to be interpreting this situation as the alleged victim admitting that she made the whole thing up. But that doesn't seem to be the case.
You are wrong. False allegations are actually vanishingly rare. This is one of those very rare cases.
That said I hope Bruhn recovers from this and gets a satisfactory outcome through the courts and/or the court of public opinion. Paying for sex isn't the best look for a public figure but it's low on the list of terrible indiscretions.
That’s because he had surgery on it. You did absolutely nothing and your point is ridiculously stupid.thats not what I said at all lol, secondly they took his finger injury off just like I said they should and they did
not for that long, noThat’s because he had surgery on it. You did absolutely nothing and your point is ridiculously stupid.
Are you not allowed to recover from surgery?
he also didnt have surgery so I have no idea what you are going on aboutThat’s because he had surgery on it. You did absolutely nothing and your point is ridiculously stupid.
Are you not allowed to recover from surgery?
just what the Geelong Cats reported and that was he did not have surgery but who knows with GeelongSo, you now know the intimate details of a players injury history...
Been asleep for the last 15+ years mate?
SMFC | BULLS 
Legit heard he was working on one of their farms all year.. "Git out back now an feed dem hogs boy!"just what the Geelong Cats reported and that was he did not have surgery but who knows with Geelong
Can we also point out you’re a halfwit?
Because the police force is ****ing useless.What i dont understand is why when the witness was to shaky and the CCTV so obvious the police didnt do more checking and due diligence before deciding to bring the case to court. It's going to cost the taxpayers a lot of money.
pretty insane you can make shit up that can ruin someone else's life, and you don't get held to account for it.
I doubt there would be any funds worthy of going to court again.He'd need to go civil like Depp did.
Not just incompetent but highly unethicalBecause the police force is ****ing useless.