First post guys had to say something i play in the ammo's but was watching the game in question because an old mate plays for canterbury. South yarra won fair and square easily. Harder and more committed to the ball. If canterbury where any good one player wouldnt make any difference even my mate said south yarra where too good and the coach should stop sooking.
got a feeling you are missing the point... south were better on the day as evident by the score- no one is disputing that, but rules are in place for a reason and it seems can be twisted to suit different needs and different clubs?
what if the player in question had kicked the winning goal? or this had happened in divy 1 or 2- i doubt the leauge would have let it go on for this long? but thats just my take on it-





