Analysis Stats!

[Miss Vanessa]

And after Round 6:

Metres Gained:


Intercepts:


Intercept Marks:


Pressure Acts:


Score Involvements:


Team Stats:

 

[baldandbroke]

My usual stats stuff ...

Based on current Ladder position:





Based on Squiggle Flagpole Ladder position:

 

[VSTone]

any stats this week Miss Vanessa ?

 

[Miss Vanessa]

any stats this week Miss Vanessa ?

Tonight. Apologies, am actually studying part time and had an essay due today. So no time last night. Plus, I couldn't inflict more pain on myself and spend time reflecting on Saturday night. It still hurts. Will push through and get them up tonight though. A brief look at the stats suggests a lot of people were down on season averages.

 

[VSTone]

Tonight. Apologies, am actually studying part time and had an essay due today. So no time last night. Plus, I couldn't inflict more pain on myself and spend time reflecting on Saturday night. It still hurts. Will push through and get them up tonight though. A brief look at the stats suggests a lot of people were down on season averages.

no rush... do what you got to do first...the stats can wait

 

[baldandbroke]

A little something for our mate Kingy ...



It is ridiculous to compare the for and against / defence vs offence this early in the season. We have beaten the averages against every team we have played except the Hawks. Can't wait to get to the bye so we can all look at the ladder with a bit of perspective.

 

[Miss Vanessa]

After Round 7:

Meters Gained
Intercepts


Intercerpt Marks


Pressure Acts


Score Involvements


And a couple new ones...

Hitouts


Freekicks



Team Stats

 

[Miss Vanessa]

A couple of interesting things after a third of the season is done and dusted:

Not counting the North game, in which I don't have the breakdown of hitouts to advantage, Jenkins ruck work is near identical in terms of effectiveness to Jacobs:

Sam Jacobs Hitouts (to adv.): 201 (51) = 25% hitouts to adv.
Josh Jenkins Hitouts (to adv.): 30 (7) = 23% hitouts to adv.

Unsurprisingly, most of our scoring has come from turnovers and the opposition has scored more heavily from stoppages than we have:

Adelaide
Turnovers: 69 points per game
Stoppages: 37 points per game
Kickins: 7 points per game

Opposition
Turnovers: 50 points per game
Stoppages: 41 points per game
Kickins: 7 points per game

 

[Jeffcrowe]

After Round 7:

Meters GainedView attachment 245244
Intercepts
View attachment 245245

Intercerpt Marks
View attachment 245246

Pressure Acts
View attachment 245247

Score Involvements
View attachment 245249

And a couple new ones...

Hitouts
View attachment 245250

Freekicks
View attachment 245253
View attachment 245254

Team Stats
View attachment 245255
View attachment 245256

Intercept marks and intercepts ?

Great work by the way much appreciated

 

[Miss Vanessa]

Intercept marks and intercepts ?

Great work by the way much appreciated

Intercept marks - marks from opposition kicks.
Intercepts - I believe it's the number of intercept possessions a player has ie. number of possessions resulting directly from opposition disposals... Though not 100% on that.

I'm pretty sure it's not spoils, which would be a nice stat to have, but don't have access to.

 

[Jeffcrowe]

Intercept marks - marks from opposition kicks.
Intercepts - I believe it's the number of intercept possessions a player has ie. number of possessions resulting directly from opposition disposals... Though not 100% on that.

I'm pretty sure it's not spoils, which would be a nice stat to have, but don't have access to.

Haha yeah I know but couldn't see them in the list above

 

[Jeffcrowe]

Sorry computer was playing up - can see them now

 

[Miss Vanessa]

Haha yeah I know but couldn't see them in the list above

Really. They're showing up for me... Hmmmm. Can anyone else see them?

 

[Jeffcrowe]

Hartigan has been sensational this year - leading intercepts and intercept marks

Who would have thought

Great stuff

 

[VSTone]

A couple of interesting things after a third of the season is done and dusted:

Not counting the North game, in which I don't have the breakdown of hitouts to advantage, Jenkins ruck work is near identical in terms of effectiveness to Jacobs:

Sam Jacobs Hitouts (to adv.): 201 (51) = 25% hitouts to adv.
Josh Jenkins Hitouts (to adv.): 30 (7) = 23% hitouts to adv.

Crows 241 (58) = 24%
Oppo 257 (65) = 25%

no real advantage at all is there... i wonder if this is a league wide standard...?

with the pill in dispute 50% of the time the contested possies in the guts are where the clearance advantage is made?



the doggies mids blitzed ours in that stat... absolutely demolished us!

 

[VSTone]

Really. They're showing up for me... Hmmmm. Can anyone else see them?

yep i can see them

 

[Pdub]

Crows 241 (58) = 24%
Oppo 257 (65) = 25%

no real advantage at all is there... i wonder if this is a league wide standard...?

with the pill in dispute 50% of the time the contested possies in the guts are where the clearance advantage is made?

View attachment 245302

the doggies mids blitzed ours in that stat... absolutely demolished us!

Contested Disposal? I don't think that stat site realises possessions and disposals are different stats.

 

[Iron]

A little something for our mate Kingy ...

View attachment 245186

It is ridiculous to compare the for and against / defence vs offence this early in the season. We have beaten the averages against every team we have played except the Hawks. Can't wait to get to the bye so we can all look at the ladder with a bit of perspective.

This is an interesting angle to take on stats. Thanks for highlighting it.

 

[SydCrow]

David Mackay's value shown here in metres gained and pressure acts. We will miss that this week.

 

[Mattrox]

Crows 241 (58) = 24%
Oppo 257 (65) = 25%

no real advantage at all is there... i wonder if this is a league wide standard...?

with the pill in dispute 50% of the time the contested possies in the guts are where the clearance advantage is made?

View attachment 245302

the doggies mids blitzed ours in that stat... absolutely demolished us!

Free Kicks skew Contested Disposals

The Bont won 16 of his CP. Where as Libba won 10 and was handed 5 free kicks. Dollhouse won 10 and got 3 frees.

The Bont was clearly ahead of anybody on the field but then they drop away quickly.

Lynch won 12, Rory 11, and Tex 10 subtracting frees.

This is why we need to see the "ground ball" stats to see who is actually getting the ball away from the contest. I don't count burrowing your head into a tackle a CP. Eventually you'll break your neck.

 

[earlsta]

Where's Henderson for round 7.

 

[Miss Vanessa]

Where's Henderson for round 7.

Bugger. Keep forgetting to add the newbies. Will add properly next week, but for now:

Metres Gained = 542m
Intercepts = 2
Intercept Marks = 0
Pressure Acts = 8
Score Involvements = 1

Meters gained very good, pressure acts average but the other 3 stats not great for the role he played.

 

[earlsta]

Bugger. Keep forgetting to add the newbies. Will add properly next week, but for now:

Metres Gained = 542m
Intercepts = 2
Intercept Marks = 0
Pressure Acts = 8
Score Involvements = 1

Meters gained very good, pressure acts average but the other 3 stats not great for the role he played.

Metres gained 542m!? That's pretty impressive, bloody hell.

 

[fairfooty]

Thanks Miss V - this is a great thread with some great stats and analysis - send it to the Don - he likes this sort of stuff and might find it useful.

 

[Kane McGoodwin]

Metres gained 542m!? That's pretty impressive, bloody hell.

Which is why I prefer we release hendo to a wing...