Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

PLUS Your club board comp is now up!
Fantasy Footy Notice Image Round 0
SuperCoach Rd 0 - The Throw Up SC Talk - Rate My Team - Injuries - SC Leagues ,//, AFL Fantasy Rd 0 AFF Talk - Preseason 2026 - Rate My Team
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Carl Spackler said:Probably important to name an unchanged line up from a 'body language' point of view. If we'd rung the changes it would have suggested that the loss last week had upset the apple cart. An unchanged line up tends to indicate that things are going to plan.
Disappointed that Bock's not in though. At least he'll get a game in the SANFL.
Yeh I assumed he was going to be included too however while listening to Benny Rutten’s interview it became apparent he wasn’t going to be in.Blue Red and Gold said:suprised Welsh is not in, I thought he was a certainty.
crows98 said:We made changes after we smashed Essendon by 140 points how come that wouldn’t upset the applecart?
Carl Spackler said:Errr... the 220 point differential perhaps?
crows98 said:You’re still sending a negative message to the player
After their great form all players deserve one bad game...and the West Coast was it. This was written Thursday night but I will be surprised if we don't thrash the Pies.Crow-mo said:Strong statement there,
lets hope it's the right one.
RogerRabbit69 said:Initially, I was surprised there were no changes but, when I thought about it a bit more, I shouldn't have been.
It sends a clear message, doesn't it?
"We have faith in our group to respond to last week's effort".
Craig seems very big on placing a lot of responsibility with the playing group.
Very important factor this one we all said the Eagles loss will become more clearer after the Pies game well it is just starting to become a bit more clearer nowCarl Spackler said:Probably important to name an unchanged line up from a 'body language' point of view. If we'd rung the changes it would have suggested that the loss last week had upset the apple cart. An unchanged line up tends to indicate that things are going to plan.
Disappointed that Bock's not in though. At least he'll get a game in the SANFL.
RogerRabbit69 said:Initially, I was surprised there were no changes but, when I thought about it a bit more, I shouldn't have been.
It sends a clear message, doesn't it?
"We have faith in our group to respond to last week's effort".
Craig seems very big on placing a lot of responsibility with the playing group.
Well, the team is pretty much set. However my ideal changes would be:SpringChoke said:I agree. Does this mean, McLeod aside, and assuming no further injuries, that this will be the 22 we go into finals with?
Wo do you consider will be a chance to come in?
For this week?Drummond said:Well, the team is pretty much set. However my ideal changes would be:
In: Welsh, Bock, Hudson
Out: Shirley, Stevens, Clarke
Carl Spackler said:I'm not talking about the message to the player. I'm talking about the message it sends to the rest of the competition. After last Saturday the spotlight is on us. We are under the microscope. Are we the premiership favourites or pretenders?
This week is going to be very telling. How will the players react? How will the coaching staff and selectors react?
The unchanged line up is a bold, positive move. We had to give the impression that there isn't an ounce of self-doubt creeping in.
Nah mate. I don't mean for this week. I'm saying once those changes are made over the coming few weeks, that would be my ideal side.Kane McGoodwin said:For this week?
How many underdone players do you want to play at once?