- May 20, 2014
- 21,007
- 26,842
- AFL Club
- Geelong
$1.50 shots in tennis are always risky, particularly late in tournaments when the models are locked in with a few matches data.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
$1.50 shots in tennis are always risky, particularly late in tournaments when the models are locked in with a few matches data.
How do you know "the big punters" were on the Alcarez side?I just think it is a terrible price point in tennis. You either want to back outsiders or $1.20s when the modellers would be on your side. The big punters have absolutely wiped the public out in this spot.
yes because """models""" are only going to take into account 6 games of data leading into a grand slam final$1.50 shots in tennis are always risky, particularly late in tournaments when the models are locked in with a few matches data.
Fade every 1.50 in semi and finals = profits?Because the general publics eyes light up with Djokovic at $1.50 as above. Someone is keeping that Alcaraz price tight, it would take a lot of money to do so.
Fade every 1.50 in semi and finals = profits?
I wouldn't bet at all in a semi or final as the inefficiencies / variances have largely been removed from the prices at that point
I just think it is a terrible price point in tennis. You either want to back outsiders or $1.20s when the modellers would be on your side. The big punters have absolutely wiped the public out in this spot.
Anybody like Learner Tien for an upset?
Paying $32 vs Tiafoe on betfair. Corporates offering about half that.
Also Raonic vs Tsitsipas, has beaten him twice in a row and yet paying $4 to do it again today.
Mmoh +5.5
5u Novak to Win US Open $1.91