List Mgmt. The 2019 Trade and Free Agency Thread

[Deelighted]

RIP frostball

 

[Gysberts2Bate]

I don’t understand why we gave them so many picks lol.

 

[Grimesy87]

Geelong want top 10 pick giants want green. We give 3 to giants for 6 and Bonar or Finlayson , give 6 to Geelong for 14 and 17?

You're effectively judging bonar/finlayson as pick 15-20. It's got to be something we can't say no to. Bonar has already been described as being available for a mid to late second by giants list manager Jason McCarthy. If giants want 3, which effectively gives them 2 of the top 5 picks in the draft (a team who just made the gf) then they will need to offer something a whole heap more.

I like the idea, if we can get 2 mid first rounders and 1 top 15 player, I agree. Just not sure bonar or finlayson are the ones. As I said, this trade gives gws 2 top 5 picks in essence, so unless we make ourselves considerably stronger, and I'm talking Caldwell, Daniels or even hately/ohallaran and a top 30 pick, then take 3 to the draft.

 

[All Aboard the Dee Train]

That future second is likely to be a late 20s or early 30s pick. In a shallow and compromised draft apparently. Truly seems like we've just done a pick swap with Hawthorn and then given them Frost for free.

 

[The Dr]

Mahoney just has no ability to negotiate. Unbelievable.


On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app

 

[Devastating Boris]

I don’t understand why we gave them so many picks lol.

We won’t use them.

Interesting thought it pretty much means we won’t be trading next years’ first.

 

[Grimesy87]

Oh god whoever is in charge of that trade needs a slap to the face. That's horrendous

 

[stEdy]

Mahoney taking care of business

 

[Charlie_s123]

Frost just traded. Plus we gave them 42, 61 and next year's 4th rounder...
We get back 50 this year and next year's future 2nd.
Ugh.

Mahoney after the Frost deal

 

[Gysberts2Bate]

We won’t use them.

Interesting thought it pretty much means we won’t be trading next years’ first.

We won’t use 42?

 

[The Dr]

We won’t use them.

Interesting thought it pretty much means we won’t be trading next years’ first.

Why? Re both statements.


On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app

 

[booshboy]

unless we're trading Hawthorns future 2nd to Freo for langdon which I highly doubt, that's a fair shafting..

 

[Devastating Boris]

We won’t use 42?

Potentially.

 

[stEdy]

Please post more wild rumours @DB

Work is boring and I need some juicy inside goss

 

[Benwah83]

Ugh. I guess we're banking on the Hawks falling in a heap next year, rather than Frostball carrying them into the top 4...

 

[Gysberts2Bate]

Ugh. I guess we're banking on the Hawks falling in a heap next year, rather than Frostball carrying them into the top 4...

At best we’d be getting pick 20. At worst it could blow out to the 40s. There has to be something going on behind the scenes for the club to be so willing to move on a best 22 player.

 

[Tulip]

We are so ******* dumb

 

[Deelighted]

MFC incompetence at it's finest, you just love to see it

 

[Devastating Boris]

I was probably incorrect to say we wouldn’t use it, should have said that it’s not as important as 3 picks before it .

 

[blitznu]

Basically upgraded both picks 10+ places for Frost. Nothing wrong with that deal ******* sooks

 

[All Aboard the Dee Train]

If the Hawks are allegedly paying him big coin, we should've used that as leverage! But no, instead we basically said we barely rate Frost as a best 22 player and was easily replaceable.

 

[00Stinger]

So we are paying Hawthorn to take Frost off our hands?

I seriously can't work out the value of us giving Frost away that cheaply

 

[rhaz]

I reckon that second-round pick will end up around 33 next year. I could see Hawthorn finished 5th-8th. Our future fourth would be in the 60s or 70s. If we use that:

Out: Frost, 42, 61, Pick 60-70
In: 50, 33

Why did we add the fourth and future fourth? Surely Frost + 42 for 50 + 33 would be enough - and even for that i'd still feel robbed.

 

[schmuttt]

Weird trade.

 

[Grimesy87]

I reckon that second-round pick will end up around 33 next year. I could see Hawthorn finished 5th-8th. Our future fourth would be in the 60s or 70s. If we use that:

Out: Frost, 42, 61, Pick 60-70
In: 50, 33

Why did we add the fourth and future fourth? Surely Frost + 42 for 50 + 33 would be enough - and even for that i'd still feel robbed.

I highly doubt hawks make finals, but even still it's 28 at best with academy and everything.

I'm trying to park my outrage until the end of the trade period for this, as right now this looks horrendous.