Roast The AFL aren't taking concussion and head trauma seriously enough. Lalor/Ginbey incident.

[bzparkes]

If the mark was taken before he got there, why did Ginbey push him?

If the mark was already taken, why didn't Lalor pull up?

 

[AstuteTiger]

???

Ginbey was trying to push him off the line, as happens in every single marking contest. Unfortunately, Lalor crashed into Brock's back.

Hopper pushed Day square in the back deliberately so he'd smash into his teammate.

They aren't even remotely similar.

Get yourself into Specsavers quicksmart because Ginbey 100% shoved Lalor into that contest, resulting in a fractured jaw.

 

[bzparkes]

Get yourself into Specsavers quicksmart because Ginbey 100% shoved Lalor into that contest, resulting in a fractured jaw.

Perhaps you should watch it again once you've calmed down.

You're not loving up to the first part of your username with this comment.

 

[Aristotle Pickett the3rd]

I reckon you're completely incapable of removing any emotion from any argument you attempt to be a part of, because you're completely incapable of looking at things with pure logic.

So no weeks? All clear play on?

 

[captain bloodsport]

If the mark was already taken, why didn't Lalor pull up?

Because he was pushed into Brock, it's hard to stop when someone is pushing you forward. It's simple physics

 

[AstuteTiger]

Because he was pushed into Brock, it's hard to stop when someone is pushing you forward. It's simple physics

Good luck trying to explain this. It is fricken simple even oppo supports saw what ginbey did. I mean you could try and explain it in layman's terms but something tells me good ol bzparkes wont get it

 

[bzparkes]

So no weeks? All clear play on?

Yes.

Football incident but fair enough if they want to review this and stamp it out in future, which I imagine they will.

Based off precedent(Maynard), the AFL shouldn't punish Ginbey for a rule that doesn't exist. If they want to introduce a new rule as a result of this incident, I have no issues with that.

You can't punish a bloke for a nonexistent rule though, when every other time it's happened the player in question have gotten off.

 

[bzparkes]

Because he was pushed into Brock, it's hard to stop when someone is pushing you forward. It's simple physics

I don't think you understand physics if you think that 'push' from Ginbey was the catalyst for the collision when he was already going fast and was late to the contest to begin with.

I won't argue that Ginbey forward momentum would've contributed but this happens at every contest when blokes are engaged with each other whilst attempting to get tot eh ball.

 

[bzparkes]

Lol you aint coming across to bright. I have seen it multiple times he pushes him deliberately into the contest how you cant see this beggars belief but hey you do follow the eagles so that explains your not so bright comments.

 

[BF Tiger]

Well, considering Jack Riewoldt tunneled Barrass, broke his back and nearly ended his career and nothing was made of it, I find it a bit rich for Tigers supporters to now suddenly be up in arms over dangerous actions.

Also, one's outlawed by the tribunal(tunneling), the other isn't.

Did Riewoldt get punished?

I’ve made no comment on the Barrass-Riewoldt incident because I don’t recall it.

What I do find hypocritical is that you clearly would have liked to have seen Riewoldt suspended for causing a serious neck injury but don’t want Ginbey suspended for causing serious head trauma and facial injury. Interesting BZ.

 

[AstuteTiger]

Seems the footy world is in agreeance with what ginbey did but Eagles fans nothing to see here

 

[captain bloodsport]

I don't think you understand physics if you think that 'push' from Ginbey was the catalyst for the collision when he was already going fast and was late to the contest to begin with.

I won't argue that Ginbey forward momentum would've contributed but this happens at every contest when blokes are engaged with each other whilst attempting to get tot eh ball.

lol it was the catalyst for the collision, if he didn't get pushed he wouldn't of collided with Brock. He wouldn't of even been in the contest, he probably wouldve run to the front of him and held him up and then stood the mark, like 90% of players do

 

[bzparkes]

I’ve made no comment on the Barrass-Riewoldt incident because I don’t recall it.

What I do find hypocritical is that you clearly would have liked to have seen Riewoldt suspended for causing a serious neck injury but don’t want Ginbey suspended for causing serious head trauma and facial injury. Interesting BZ.

Because Riewoldt intentionally tunneled Barrass, which is an offence you are supposed to be suspended for and pushing a bloke isn't.

Pretty simple difference, I'd have though.

 

[TY24]

Richmond's lawyer mounting their case to the Tribunal:

 

[bzparkes]

Seems the footy world is in agreeance with what ginbey did but Eagles fans nothing to see here

View attachment 2229606

Lol, Vic media garbage.

I guarantee you if it were reversed your Vic media darlings would've be running defence for Lalor.

It's happened enough over the years for it to be a given.

 

[BF Tiger]

They were both just charging straight at the ball drop, which Brock ran backwards to get to.

What else do you think would happen?

We never got the opportunity to find out because of Ginbey’s illegal push.

 

[AstuteTiger]

Lol, Vic media garbage.

I guarantee you if it were reversed your Vic media darlings would've be running defence for Lalor.

It's happened enough over the years for it to be a given.

Bro **** vic media or whoever, Ginbey pushed him straight into the contest which caused his fractured jaw.
How you can't see this says a lot about you. I think you need to watch it again without the biased eagles glasses on.

https://www.theroar.com.au/afl/video/watch-eagles-dog-act-leaves-tigers-no-1-draft-pick-with-fractured-jaw-1409714/

 

[BF Tiger]

I don't get why oppo fans don't understand if you start giving out suspension for things like this, your team will also lose more and more players to over the top reactions.

Settle down - put your rage aside - it's something that happens multiple times in every game.

If it was a eagle injured in the same circumstance I still wouldn't want to see any kind of suspension

So you’re fine with head trauma?

 

[bzparkes]

Bro **** vic media or whoever, Ginbey pushed him straight into the contest which caused his fractured jaw.
How you can't see this says a lot about you. I think you need to watch it again without the biased eagles glasses on.

https://www.theroar.com.au/afl/video/watch-eagles-dog-act-leaves-tigers-no-1-draft-pick-with-fractured-jaw-1409714/

You guys just can't help yourself but to use emotive arguments because you're incapable of logic, eh?

 

[bzparkes]

So you’re fine with head trauma?

As I said earlier a few times, if you want to prevent such incidents in future, you need to punish actions and not outcomes.

 

[Tony_Clifton]

The West Coast board still believes Blake Acres is responsible for ruining Chesser's debut season by making him land awkwardly.

 

[captain bloodsport]

Richmond's lawyer mounting their case to the Tribunal:

View attachment 2229612

Why would Richmond's lawyer be mounting the case? Because lalor ran too fast?

 

[AstuteTiger]

Richmond's lawyer mounting their case to the Tribunal:

View attachment 2229612

Are you condoning that dog ginbeys actions are you? Let me guess you defended another Eagles Dog act Gaff on Brayshaw

 

[bzparkes]

The West Coast board still believes Blake Acres is responsible for ruining Chesser's debut season by making him land awkwardly.

Damn straight. Ruined his career

 

[BF Tiger]

Yes, you got it.

If you can break someone's back by intentionally tunneling and have no case to answer for a clearly reportable offence, then a bloke accidentally pushing a bloke into someone running back with the flight can be safely ignored.

Hold on… was it a deliberate shove to push him off his line or an accidental push? You’re all over the place BZ.