The HFC...

[grayham]

Originally posted by Slax
grayham, go back to school and maybe you'll understand some of stocka's comments.

But then again i can't expect too much intellegence from someone who come from around shepparton.

Whats wrong with shep?

 

[goal_umpire]

Originally posted by grayham


So do I, and I am not picking on Stocka. But Fitzroy and their supporters are not some holy cow above being commented on.

Stop picking on Fitzroy.

 

[Rohan_]

Originally posted by grayham


Whats wrong with shep?

All those Turk homies.

 

[grayham]

Originally posted by suzi_olsen

Stop picking on Fitzroy.

Suz, this is big footy. Discussing clubs, supporter groups, afl is what its all about.
Picking on individual people is not what its about. Although due to the wide age groups on here, some school kids do do it.

 

[Stocka]

Originally posted by grayham


There is no way anyone with even the highest qualifications in English could have translated that single sentence to "The same could be said for you".

 

[goal_umpire]

Originally posted by grayham


Suz, this is big footy. Discussing clubs, supporter groups, afl is what its all about.
Picking on individual people is not what its about. Although due to the wide age groups on here, some school kids do do it.

So stop picking on Fitzroy because you are hurting the club's supporters, players and history.

 

[grayham]

Originally posted by suzi_olsen

So stop picking on Fitzroy because you are hurting the club's supporters, players and history.

Discussing, Picking....its such a fine line.

 

[grayham]

Originally posted by Stocka

Fancy graphics wont save you this time, Stocka

 

[Ausgard]

How can such a pointless thread generate so many remarks so quickly ?

Must be a slow day for everyone.

Someone posts a thread stating

Why Team X is crap .. and then everyone can sit back and watch about 10 very bored people implode.

now that you mention it it does sound kinda more interesting than a monday afternoon

 

[Stocka]

Originally posted by grayham


Fancy graphics wont save you this time, Stocka

Actually, it's you who looks the fool grayham, for not being able to interpret a simple sentence. What a laugh.

 

[grayham]

Originally posted by Stocka


Actually, it's you who looks the fool grayham, for not being able to interpret a simple sentence. What a laugh.

i think we can add "cant read" to the "cant write" part of your resume. I said I figured it was something along those lines, but not from your jumble of words.

 

[grayham]

Originally posted by Ausgard
How can such a pointless thread generate so many remarks so quickly ?

Must be a slow day for everyone.

Someone posts a thread stating

Why Team X is crap .. and then everyone can sit back and watch about 10 very bored people implode.

now that you mention it it does sound kinda more interesting than a monday afternoon

It was a public duty to save this stupid thread started by Rohan_ from itself, and divert it onto a discussion about nothing.

 

[Ausgard]

Originally posted by grayham


It was a public duty to save this stupid thread started by Rohan_ from itself, and divert it onto a discussion about nothing.

LOL

 

[myee8]

Suzi about your threads about picking on Fitzroy supporters and Collingwood supporters apparently picking on Hawthorn - you do not represent all Hawks supporters, only yourself. Stay in your dellusional state if you must, but that's a fact.

 

[goal_umpire]

Originally posted by grayham


i think we can add "cant read" to the "cant write" part of your resume. I said I figured it was something along those lines, but not from your jumble of words.

what a stupid post from a fussy person.

Get a grip grayham.

 

[Stocka]

Originally posted by grayham


i think we can add "cant read" to the "cant write" part of your resume. I said I figured it was something along those lines, but not from your jumble of words.

Tell me, what would you know?

The fact that you failed to understand it (when it was a perfectly logical sentence), proves that you are the one with the poor language skills.

 

[Goldenblue]

Originally posted by Rohan_
Their club has only been successful in a 20 year period of it's entire history. Perhaps the softest club and supporters in the AFL.

Hey Rohandonit

One flag in 44 years does not exactly make your club successful.

You really are an egotistical tosser

 

[goal_umpire]

Originally posted by myee8
Suzi about your threads about picking on Fitzroy supporters and Collingwood supporters apparently picking on Hawthorn - you do not represent all Hawks supporters, only yourself. Stay in your dellusional state if you must, but that's a fact.

You can't answer for all North Melbourne supporters either.

Butt out of it because it is none of your business

 

[Stocka]

Originally posted by myee8
It seems like we have a new rivalry developing here...

It's on for young and old, by the looks of it.

 

[myee8]

Originally posted by suzi_olsen

You can't answer for all North Melbourne supporters either.

Butt out of it because it is none of your business

Umm did i ever say i answered for all NM supporters Miss Hypocrite?? You are the one butting in everywhere.

 

[superstar]

Re: Re: The HFC...

Originally posted by Goldenblue


Hey Rohandonit

One flag in 44 years does not exactly make your club successful.

You really are an egotistical tosser

Exactly! Collingwood can only compare themselves to St Kilda, and Geelong. They're not in the league of Hawthorn, Essendon, Calrton or North Melbourne over any time period that matters. You are a dead set joke Rohan and so is your club.

 

[Rohan_]

Re: Re: The HFC...

Originally posted by Goldenblue




One flag in 44 years does not exactly make your club successful.

So 14 flags makes Collingwood unsuccessful? 1313 wins (the most of any club) makes us unsuccessful?

 

[Cyclops]

Something is a bit wrong at Hawthorn. The Croad business was poorly handled and hurt the club. I don't think it was the kid's fault, and he's doing fine at Freo when nearly all the Hawk big men went down this season.

The perceived Dicker/Schwab split is hurting too, with the coach seen as a "lame duck" on borrowed time. I don't think its true, but the whiff of it is destabilising. The Spider gamble smells of desperation, from a club that traditionally values "clean living"-they sacked Ablett remember.

Its possible they honestly thought (like the Tigers) that they'd done the hard work in 2001 so a 2002 GF spot was a lay down misere. If they still have that attitude then they are like Collingwood in 1995-headed for a long drought.

Its not all bad. They have some ace young runners coming through. Barker and Holland have crocked it, but the other big men should come back hard. Spider might reform his character.

Above all they have Crawford. I don't mind bagging him for a pretty boy, but the guy is solid gold. He gets the hard ball and delivers with smooth aplomb. He's a matchwinner and a workhorse. Bagging his footy ability is like running down Buckley-you're just revealing your ignorance.

If the Hawks keep their heads down and forget Goldspink, they'll go places: If they live in the past, that's the only place they'll find success.

 

[grayham]

Originally posted by Stocka


Tell me, what would you know?

The fact that you failed to understand it (when it was a perfectly logical sentence), proves that you are the one with the poor language skills.

No, it actually shows that you have poor language skills, because under even the most relaxed of syntax rules, your sentence fails to meet basic criteria ... a bit like fitzroy.

 

[superstar]

Re: Re: Re: The HFC...

Originally posted by Rohan_


So 14 flags makes Collingwood unsuccessful? 1313 wins (the most of any club) makes us unsuccessful?

Who cares about what you did 70 years ago? You are an unsuccesful club with a culture of losing.