Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

LIVE: Geelong v Gold Coast - Rd 14 - 7:40PM Fri
Squiggle tips Cats at 78% chance -- What's your tip? -- Injury Lists » -- All Rd 14 Games
Somebody rang ?This looks like a job for DermiesLuvChild .![]()
Somebody rang ?
View attachment 35782
Not normally into the commercial stuff (but what the hell, it is draft week).
) but this is lacking a little flair, where is the aggression?
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Artistic freedom out the window. Commercial pressures & time frames have severely impacted my ability to be one with the canvas.It's good but below your usual standard.
I've always enjoyed your brushstroke (someone will pay me back here) but this is lacking a little flair, where is the aggression?
Overall I think you need to go back to your original brush flair plus the passion man! Where is the passion!![]()
Agreed. Two best players in the draft after Boyd. Kelly there abouts also.Scharenberg & Sheed pls
Salem is as good as Sheed (quicker, better kick).. they are both so balanced they glide over the ground like a Cullen.. anyway we can't go screwing WC after they gave us their pick 6Agreed. Two best players in the draft after Boyd. Kelly there abouts also.

Sheed will be the higher disposal getter when he comes to the real stuff against men imo. Sheed also a better leader..Salem is as good as Sheed (quicker, better kick).. they are both so balanced they glide over the ground like a Cullen.. anyway we can't go screwing WC after they gave us their pick 6![]()
Given that over the years maybe only half of the first round picks turn out to be solid players can we only expect 3 out of our 6 first rounders over the last 2 years (I include Adams) will turn out to be successful?

Brilliant, I'll sleep better now!No, because teams like Melbourne regularly screw up all of their first round picks, meaning that to even it out, some teams get all of them right![]()
Given that over the years maybe only half of the first round picks turn out to be solid players can we only expect 3 out of our 6 first rounders over the last 2 years (I include Adams) will turn out to be successful?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Pies are 3 duds from 8 picks but have done well with each of their last 5.
What do these figures mean?Obviously what is a solid player is subjective but on a games played basis for 2001 to 2009 (giving more leeway for later years as they haven't had same opportunity to play lots of games) there are 162 first rounders and about 44 duds which is 27%. Drops to 18 of 90 duds (20%) for top 10 picks.
I think Grundy & Adams have shown enough to be solid or better (barring injury) and I'd be confident that from Kennedy, Broomhead and 6&10 we will add at least 2 solid players.
Interestingly Carlton 0/9, Saints 0/9 & Eagles 0/10 are best at avoiding duds (if you don't include Hampson (63 games and still going), Clarke (85 games), Sampi (78), whilst Freo 4/8 and Swans 4/7 are worst.
Pies are 3 duds from 8 picks but have done well with each of their last 5.
What do these figures mean?
Ok, so on those figures neither Carlton or Saints have picked a first round dud?1st figure is number of duds picked in 1st round, 2nd is number of 1st round picks the club has had.
You so talented.Somebody rang ?
View attachment 35782
Not normally into the commercial stuff (but what the hell, it is draft week).
Ok, so on those figures neither Carlton or Saints have picked a first round dud?
Interesting, what do you call a dud?
Matthew Watson?
Kane Lucas?
X Clarke?
R Clarke?
T Lynch?
