Nothing in Restricted Free Agency states or implies that a player needs to be or can be traded to move clubs. They're still essentially uncontracted at the end of the year. It simply gives the player's current club first rights to match any contract offer.
Hahahahaha this is hilarious, For both the AFL and ALFPA to make two types of Free Agents, Restrricted and Unrestricted, wouldnt you think the rule is that the existing club can match any offer for only two outcomes either the player stays or they risk the PSD. If the player wasnt infact nominating a club or speaking to any other clubs as he was looking to leave no offer would need to be match. But by this wonderfull Restricted word added it gives some sort of power to the existing club by being able top match the offer in either an attempt to regain the player or at least force him into the PSD where he would have to take his chances where he ends up! So power is given back to the club and by trading eleveating any risk for thr player going into the PSD. Pretty sure this is why the AFL and the AFLPA introduced the Resitrected free agent so that the existing club still retain some bargaining Power. What is your take on it and why such a silly type of player agreement was put in place if infact you think it varys to my summary!