Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Can we go back to back in 2019
i think stuart clark or someone else replaced brett lee
Look up Barry "nugget" Reese.who's the old bloke?
What point? You said yourself, rightly, that the pitches were as flat as a shitcarters hatOther World Cups we have had MULTIPLE people with 20 wickets, look at 2003 for evidence on that. I know the pitches were flatter this time, but the point stands. Starc carried this attack.
Forgot Maxwell, but even so that is 2 batsmen...you are being very generous counting Finch! Might as well count Warner while you are at it despite him having a horrendous WC!
I agree, I also think it was overshadowed a bit by the death of Bob Woolmer, the catch taken by the fat bloke from Bermuda that caused an earthquake in some parts of the world and that, like this world cup, certain teams get in through tokenism.They all bowled incredibly well in 2007 as well, i think people tend to rate the 2007 WC win lower than others because of the piss poor organization, the time the games were on and the farcical near darkness finish but we really did dominate that cup more than any other.
I think you mean "the single greatest moment in cricketing history".I agree, I also think it was overshadowed a bit by the death of Bob Woolmer, the catch taken by the fat bloke from Bermuda that caused an earthquake in some parts of the world and that, like this world cup, certain teams get in through tokenism.
Bangladesh vs England for the lulz factor of England being sent packingHard to go past NZ v SA for me. Most even contest between bat and ball.
Bangladesh vs England for the lulz factor of England being sent packing
Not really. They achieve what they're expected to. Nothing!I swear that English side should be given a lifetime underachievement award.
What point? You said yourself, rightly, that the pitches were as flat as a shitcarters hat
Yes, when you play more games, you will get more wickets... it's truePlayers still got 20+ wickets, and the fact is both the 2003 and the 2007 attacks had blokes getting more lots of 20+ wickets, and you would hardly call those wickets seaming paradises.
1999 - 12 matches - 1 bowler with 20+
2003 - 11 matches - 2 bowlers with 20+
2007 - 11 matches - 3 bowlers with 20+
2011 - 6 matches - 0 bowlers with 20+
2015 - 8 matches - 1 boers with 20+
So sure, in 2003 we had 2 bowlers with 20+ wickets, but Aus also played 3 more games.
Anyone hear Faulkner on SEN this morning, very funny... very hammered.
Reckon most blokes will be still pissed at the presentation going on at Fed Square at the moment given they were still going strong at 7am
Think in 2007 we had all 3 bowlers over 20 wickers...McGrath, Hogg and Tait? Memory could be failing though.
I was at that game. ******* terrible behaviour. My mate and I were telling everyone within range what ********s they were!aussie supporters can be dogs...remember when clarke got booed at the gabba? ******* disgusting
Don't forget 1987So what's that now? 99, 03, 07 and 15, that's pure domination, fantastic to see the Aussies win another one, were easily on paper the strongest side in the WC, we just hopes they got it all together and didn't choke, last night was a masterclass and NZ were never really in it.
We are a very good chance of winning it again in 2019 as well, most of this group will still be going. Haddin, Clarke, johnson, watson are the obvious ones that come to mind who will be retired.
So what's that now? 99, 03, 07 and 15, that's pure domination, fantastic to see the Aussies win another one, were easily on paper the strongest side in the WC, we just hopes they got it all together and didn't choke, last night was a masterclass and NZ were never really in it.
We are a very good chance of winning it again in 2019 as well, most of this group will still be going. Haddin, Clarke, johnson, watson are the obvious ones that come to mind who will be retired.