- Joined
- Jul 5, 2012
- Posts
- 31,911
- Reaction score
- 55,531
- AFL Club
- Sydney
- Other Teams
- Kidding, right?
Maybe we should all take a 48 hour break.How on Earth has this gotten as far as it has ?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Maybe we should all take a 48 hour break.How on Earth has this gotten as far as it has ?
Wear it with pride just like bleeding heart and do gooder. How dare you believe in social justice!Can we have a filter for SJW please?
What pillock came up with this abbreviation?
Never. If we silence the fools, then how can we learn from their stupidity?
"A pejorative term for an individual who repeatedly and vehemently engages in arguments on social justice on the Internet, often in a shallow or not well-thought-out way, for the purpose of raising their own personal reputation."Oh come on. You're a bigot if you're sick of the perpetually outraged? SJW is fine.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
"And now, let's turn the table on racism with turntables, featuring DJ Matainavora with a very indigenous remix of You Will Never Tear Us Apart!"First the minutes applause
Turning of the backs
Now the banner
.... For Gods Sake
Different penalties, different reaction by family and friends , compassion and forgiveness in the case of manslaughter being accidental or unintended
This is what is missing in this whole fiasco
And all due respect - we are talking about someone being called a name and having their feelings hurt
Not murder
I wouldn't think. I'd say it's all the more reason to keep it open.Close thread?
Among the more stupid things I've read in my life tbh.
I just can't accept this. My experience in establishing common ground with people of different cultural perceptions screams to me that inflexibility like this is most counter-productive (not to mention pretty arrogant).
No, fools provide us great examples of what not to do.'Learn from stupidity'...
Wouldn't that be an oxymoron?
Don't forget the indigenous jumpersFirst the minutes applause
Turning of the backs
Now the banner
.... For Gods Sake
No, fools provide us great examples of what not to do.
No, I was thinking more along the line of the 'ban the boo' crowd.You mean like the booers?
he won't, cats are not up to it. they have a long history of celebrating their own failure.I'm actually anxious about the Geelong v Sydney match. If he gets booed all game with every touch again this will be all over the media more than ever.
Caroline Wilson in the Age in the 2104 GF edition, rather than mention the actual game she said the racist boos from Hawthorn were a blight on the game. I don't think she remembered that Gibson was Injured in a collision with Goodes earlier in the year.Good point, so who did say it was racist?
You cannot presume to know what I would have done.As you would in his position.
Yep... he ran with the racism angleYep.
What were his exact words about it the next day? I know they've been posted but I don't have the links.
So, let's knock that over. On the field, after the game, the next day. We've heard this part. You think that wasn't fair.
"Finally" being the operative word.What position did he finally arrive at?
How does that match up with your position?
No, I was thinking more along the line of the 'ban the boo' crowd.
[/QUOTE]You cannot presume to know what I would have done.
Would I have flown off the handle at a child in front of a national audience and a stadium full of people without knowing for sure what she meant?
Doubt it very much. Would I have made a complaint for the AFL to investigate if I felt that aggrieved by a child's comment? Who knows. Would have wanted to be 100% sure before I made a Federal Case out of it.
Yep... he ran with the racism angle
Are you being deliberately obtuse? Pretty sure you know he went with "face of racism is a 13 year old girl" line. Even 12 hours after the event.
No. It was unfair to accuse her of a racial slur - not once, at the time, not twice, after the game and certainly not the third time at the press conference without some sort of investigation on his part. He's dead set lucky if you ask me, that her parents were not "Tania and James Hird" types and took him to court over it.
"Finally" being the operative word.
Finally, AFTER labelling her the "face of racism" he conceded that she may have not had the benefit of an education or parenting that would have prevented an outburst of this nature in the first place. He had ample time to consider his words.
It doesn't.
You missed the point, again...outcome is still the same for the person at the receiving end.
"A pejorative term for an individual who repeatedly and vehemently engages in arguments on social justice on the Internet, often in a shallow or not well-thought-out way, for the purpose of raising their own personal reputation."
Urban Dictionary work for you?
So it is meant to be about people who are just in it for the lulz, shutting stuff down, slacktivists clicking like on Facebook so they can be seen to be doing the right thing in front of their friends.
What it seems to have devolved into is "anyone who has an opinion that what I say doesn't match some left-of-centre ideal".
It is a lazy way to argue a point. You can do better.
Why do all the pro-booers fail to cite his comments in full?
You know the bit about how it was not her fault and she was innocent. Go and look up his comments in their entirety.You mean where he called her "the face of racism"?
And then went on with some other palaver after to justify that statement?
Those comments you mean?
Quote away
He had all night to think what he would say and thats what he came up with. A gotcha moment for the "cause" regardless of the age , education and circumstances of the child.
You know the bit about how it was not her fault and she was innocent. Go and look up his comments in their entirety.
"Finally" being the operative word.
Finally, AFTER labelling her the "face of racism" he conceded that she may have not had the benefit of an education or parenting that would have prevented an outburst of this nature in the first place. He had ample time to consider his words.
It doesn't.
You mean where he called her "the face of racism"?
And then went on with some other palaver after to justify that statement?
Those comments you mean?
Quote away
He had all night to think what he would say and thats what he came up with. A gotcha moment for the "cause" regardless of the age , education and circumstances of the child.
Was she given the oportunity to say "yes I called him an ape. I didn't realise it was racial, I'm sorry - he's big and hairy" ?