8th in B and F and only played 13 games.
*ing campaigners.
Will miss you Mickey B.
*ing campaigners.
Will miss you Mickey B.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He was the main reason we won 3 games in a row last year, without him it could have been zero.
Unless his shoulder is so bad he will miss 12 games, I'd be signing him as depth to cover off losing one of our other inside mid's again. Can't believe no other team wanted him, even for some low pick.
Pearce. Suban etc can GTFO right now - WTF is Bondy thinking? Lloyd nails the best trade period ever, then Bondy kicks us in the collective soft bits with this one...
But if they knew that, why not take him for pick 88? I'm sure Freo would have done the trade at the end of the trade period.I actually think there are clubs that want him but they know that we were most likely going to delist him anyways (like Dylan Roberton). He will be picked up now as a delisted free agent no problems.
But if they knew that, why not take him for pick 88? I'm sure Freo would have done the trade at the end of the trade period.
Maybe Mitchell & Lewis took the only old gun spots available this year.
Its the right decision no doubt, but it still sucks. He was a quality player and an even better person. One of my favourites for sure!
Miss barlow , right decision no doubt , because barlow can offer more to other team since he is delisted might get 2 years contract from other team.Why? Explain please why it was the right decision "no doubt"
So who plays next season. Barlow or Blakely?Why? Explain please why it was the right decision "no doubt"
What would be the point. With his delisting today we now use pick 71 in the draft. This pick after list submissions and the academy bidding will drop to somewhere in the 60's.But if they knew that, why not take him for pick 88? I'm sure Freo would have done the trade at the end of the trade period.
Maybe Mitchell & Lewis took the only old gun spots available this year.
So who plays next season. Barlow or Blakely?
I think pick 71 will be another rough diamonds.What would be the point. With his delisting today we now use pick 71 in the draft. This pick after list submissions and the academy bidding will drop to somewhere in the 60's.
Obviously the clubs were not willing to part with a pick below 70 and knowing that he was already being delisted. It was a shame we couldn't have upgraded our pick 71 to something a bit lower and made for a simple move. But at the end of the day other clubs have to come to the party.
A pick after 71 isn't much good to us.
All the very best to Micky B, always loved his work for freo.
Miss barlow , right decision no doubt , because barlow can offer more to other team since he is delisted might get 2 years contract from other team.
Then bond , ross , and the board all tunnel vision.Just because he's a better fit elsewhere doesn't mean he would not have been more than useful for us. Very tunnel visioned viewpoint.
Going to bite us on the arse, Pick 71 or Barlow ...FFS.
s**t decision.
Then bond , ross , and the board all tunnel vision.
I definitely see you as one of the more sane and balanced poster on the boards so interested in your opinion.
If pick 71 never plays a game for us it will roughly be the amount of games Barlow would have played for us if he had stayed. Unless we had another unmitigated disaster of a year injury-wise who would he forced out of the side?
We are more than covered from a half forward point of view now and in the middle Blakely, Neale, Fyfe, Mundy etc or even guys like Weller are ahead of him. Not the foot skills to play off half back either. Where would he have played?
My arguments or the ciubs decision?Bizarre !!!
Going to bite us on the arse, Pick 71 or Barlow ...FFS.
s**t decision.