Review 2017 Free Agency & Trade Period

What type of player do we need most? (Whether mature or rookie age)

  • A tall forward

    Votes: 103 57.9%
  • An inside midfielder

    Votes: 44 24.7%
  • An outside midfielder

    Votes: 4 2.2%
  • A half back

    Votes: 15 8.4%
  • A small forward

    Votes: 7 3.9%
  • A ruckman

    Votes: 5 2.8%

  • Total voters
    178

Remove this Banner Ad

Log in to remove this ad.

Winner winner chicken dinner. Absolute star this guy who will stay once we have him. With him, Fyfe, Son Son and Bennell we potentially have some real power around the goals next year. This would start to look like a Richmond model of smart small/medium forwards.
You never know if we start winning some games he might have a change of heart.
 
They will not give 2. Pick in 20s and Matera.
Matera is worthless and Weller was drafted at 13 and still in contract. How do you get to that conclusion? We rate him as our best young player, that's a big thing seeing as we're in a rebuild. Lloyd will not roll over and good on him.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

There is no way they trade Jack Martin after re-signing him for Weller for the simple point being that it defeats the whole purpose of going after Weller. Since that has been reported absolutely no where else, I'm going to put that down to the Nixon "Hogan is close to signing" absolute bs category
 
There is no way they trade Jack Martin after re-signing him for Weller for the simple point being that it defeats the whole purpose of going after Weller. Since that has been reported absolutely no where else, I'm going to put that down to the Nixon "Hogan is close to signing" absolute bs category
I’m not sure how anyone could have time to report it. No one in the media new of Weller till yesterday. Knowing Lyons love for Martin, I can imagine this is exactly who he would want in return. Both players in contract, means that if Martin is open to a trade, bargaining chips are equal.
 
Well maybe they need to weigh up if Martin is heading west end of next yr anyway..
Looks to be fake tweet but dang would be suitable compensation
 
Pick 66? Melbourne can suck my Balics


For what its worth I think that reporter got mixed up with Melbourne saying they are happy they have three pics in the late second round and that a later pick will be used for Balic. The reporter forgot that there is a 47 that Melbourne had earmarked for Balic but were waiting to make sure they had their three pics first that were lower. Still think it's 47. Just poor reporting
 
Back
Top