- Joined
- May 28, 2013
- Posts
- 26,983
- Reaction score
- 29,923
- AFL Club
- North Melbourne
- Other Teams
- Seattle Seahawks
He just came 2nd in your b&f. 10 looks fair.Herald Sun saying Geelong likely to demand top 10 pick or a first rounder & player like Brander
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

He just came 2nd in your b&f. 10 looks fair.Herald Sun saying Geelong likely to demand top 10 pick or a first rounder & player like Brander
Big Frazis like Brander - but as close as it will get re players. FFF - we dont push out players. Geelong are not pushing kelly out wither but his circumstances are close to unique in AFL circles.Herald Sun saying Geelong likely to demand top 10 pick or a first rounder & player like Brander
Herald Sun saying Geelong likely to demand top 10 pick or a first rounder & player like Brander
Brander was pick 13 last year and is a 19 year old tall. Some people think Kelly is now worth significantly more because he had a great 2018.
That's not really how it works, though. If Brander had been around a couple of years and done nothing then his value would drop off, but we drafted him at pick 13 for a reason. He's made no request to be traded and his value certainly hasn't dropped to steak knives level.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Brander wouldn’t scrape into the top30 of this years draft.
Brander wouldn’t scrape into the top30 of this years draft.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I think both clubs are more mature than some on BF and most of the media
Yeah, I agree with that - the only issue is, of course, that West Coast don't have pick 10 or anything like it. So... working with what we've got, really.He just came 2nd in your b&f. 10 looks fair.
Brander wouldn’t scrape into the top30 of this years draft.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Well, if the draft is so strong, taking our compensation pick for Lycett should be more than fair.
No because Tim Kelly is worth a lot more than pick 21 in this draft.
So it would need to be at a minimum
P21 and Brander
WCE supporters - both teams are mature, fair trade will be done, pick 22
Followed with Geelong supporters are sooks
WCE supporters - both teams are mature, fair trade will be done, pick 22
Followed with Geelong supporters are sooks
In your opinion. Tim Kelly (and associated baggage) wouldn't picked up in the draft until pick 21 if for someone reason he was in it. If this draft was held last year (i.e. he entered on 2017 WAFL form only) he would probably be picked up later than he was last year.
It wouldn't, and it won't be. IMO.
You can ask for that, but West Coast would say no. Brander was pick 13 last year - when we could've picked Kelly. We wouldn't trade him for pick 21 this year, let alone throw in pick 21 with him.
Now that WC have secured Gaff, they should play this all nonchalant. Seems to me they don't really need Kelly.
Geelong are in a bit of a tough spot unless Kelly is also willing to talk to Freo as well. Weags should play hard ball.
Sounds fair to most I imagine. Top 10 pick as a starting point with something else thrown in for good measure, or Brander and a decent pick. Do the right thing West Coast, have some compassion for the poor bloke and just get him home.GEELONG’S approach to the Tim Kelly situation will be clear cut.
Unless the Cats receive a top-10 pick as a minimum for the gun midfielder, they will attempt to keep him at the club next season.
Geelong may also inquire about 195cm key forward Jarrod Brander, the first year goalkicker who was taken with pick No.13 last year and played one AFL game.
But it will still have to be Brander and a decent draft pick as well, rather than a straight swap for Kelly.
In your opinion. Tim Kelly (and associated baggage) wouldn't picked up in the draft until pick 21 if for someone reason he was in it. If this draft was held last year (i.e. he entered on 2017 WAFL form only) he would probably be picked up later than he was last year.
It wouldn't, and it won't be. IMO.
You can ask for that, but West Coast would say no. Brander was pick 13 last year - when we could've picked Kelly. We wouldn't trade him for pick 21 this year, let alone throw in pick 21 with him.
24 goals and 2nd in B&F....You can’t see a reason why Kelly’s value might have increased?
I don’t know anything about Brander but I know Kelly is worth much more than his draft value.
Watch the morons try and argue this.... but but 2nd rounder!!!!!!!!! #derphttps://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/...e/news-story/322b280b80be9f4fb13891641a02a7e8
Sounds fair to most I imagine. Top 10 pick as a starting point with something else thrown in for good measure, or Brander and a decent pick. Do the right thing West Coast, have some compassion for the poor bloke and just get him home.![]()
If that was the price then I'd just leave it and revisit next year. I rate Brander highly from the very little I've seen of himhttps://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/...e/news-story/322b280b80be9f4fb13891641a02a7e8
Sounds fair to most I imagine. Top 10 pick as a starting point with something else thrown in for good measure, or Brander and a decent pick. Do the right thing West Coast, have some compassion for the poor bloke and just get him home.![]()
I feel really bad for poor Tim, he loves his Eagles so much but I’ve got this bad feeling they don’t think to highly of him. Just cut the poor bloke some slack and give Geelong a decent trade to get him home.https://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/...e/news-story/322b280b80be9f4fb13891641a02a7e8
Sounds fair to most I imagine. Top 10 pick as a starting point with something else thrown in for good measure, or Brander and a decent pick. Do the right thing West Coast, have some compassion for the poor bloke and just get him home.![]()

