Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So remind me, there can't be quotas for women in the Liberal Party as all pre-selection must be done by merit.
Unless you're Warren Mundine. Or Craig Kelly.
The Libs are going to implode post election if they can't get their s**t together, which one doubts they can.
Abbott wanted permanent indigenous representation in the senate which was an idea of merit.
https://www.smh.com.au/politics/fed...idea-whose-time-has-come-20190121-p50sna.htmlSource please.
And why do you think a race based policy is better than a system of merit? Are there any other races you want inclusion in the senate for?
So what was Abbott’s big idea? According to Pearson, as prime minister in September 2014, Abbott suggested to him that a block of Indigenous seats in the Senate might be the “simplest” solution to the question of representation.
You wanted a source, I gave one. Are you able to put partisanship aside and discuss the issue maturely?So what was Abbott’s big idea? According to Pearson, as prime minister in September 2014, Abbott suggested to him that a block of Indigenous seats in the Senate might be the “simplest” solution to the question of representation.The idea surfaced in The Australian the next day in a report that dismissed it as impractical. Pearson himself thought it delusional to imagine this being more easily passed in a referendum than an advisory council. Abbott himself soon backed away.
So this was it? LOL
Arguing for 'merit' based inclusion in a thread about a Lib candidate parachuted into a seat without merit is not the strongest hand here. When has merit been the overriding factor in politics?
I think the overall issue in that instance is a push to increase representation in parliament to sometime more akin to the population in general (e.g. 50% women) and quotas are but one method to achieve that aim.I thought I was responding to a question about quotas for women in the Liberal Party. It seems to be a big deal for the ALP to appoint people based on quotas rather than merit.
You wanted a source, I gave one. Are you able to put partisanship aside and discuss the issue maturely?
Notice this bloke pops up again
Very ambitious and I mean VERY
Ex president of the ALP ( 1 year lol) 3 rd on the senate seat , bitter and salty
Picked up 30 prices of silver and worked for Abbott
Bolt report used him for balance , which shows the level of bias on that station ( us style)
His own show on sky news
Treat his opinions as a grain of salt , disgrace to all first Australians and their off spring as explained by his second wife who certainly has more class than him
Amazing he's running for libs being Gerald Henderson son in law,I'm surprised it's taken so long
BOTTOM OF THE Barrell
Who's next jones and hadley
Owned and evil , ex president of the uranium society , no vested interest right
Loves god though and his deep pockets
Sound familiar ?
We don't have a system of merit now - that's the point.And why do you think a race based policy is better than a system of merit? Are there any other races you want inclusion in the senate for?
I think the overall issue in that instance is a push to increase representation in parliament to sometime more akin to the population in general (e.g. 50% women) and quotas are but one method to achieve that aim.
Many in the Libs believe the current approach isn't working, and the problem seems set to get worse given the resignations plus the rumours about Bishop vacating after the election due to her distaste at the candidate who would replace her if she resigned now.
Looking across the chamber in both houses merit seems in short supply - if you want a more partisan example, consider Glen Drury's career.
Equality of access to opportunity is something I believe most sides want, but does outcome at least in some part help inform how well that access is applied?I think you are talking about the equal outcomes vs equal opportunity debate. Equal outcomes would mean you have to make a judgment on each 'diversity group' in society then bump people into positions based on quotas of race, gender, sexuality, disability, hair colour etc. It's impractical and fundamentally immoral to assign positions of power based on subjective classifications.
Kelly O'Dwyer wasn't a great talent but got ahead by being female. She's now claiming to be a victim because she's female. OK.
We don't have a system of merit now - that's the point.
The system works well in NZ where they have permanent Maori representation in the senate, and if we have a plethora of indigenous organisations that could be merged/combined to provide a real voice that seems to be getting drowned out by competing interests.
As for the 'other races' comment, surely you can see that indigenous Australians have unique circumstances?
We don't have a system of merit now - that's the point.
The system works well in NZ where they have permanent Maori representation in the senate, and if we have a plethora of indigenous organisations that could be merged/combined to provide a real voice that seems to be getting drowned out by competing interests.
As for the 'other races' comment, surely you can see that indigenous Australians have unique circumstances?
Well for the avoidance of doubt, nobody is proposing this for anyone other than the original inhabitants of Australia.The difference between here and NZ is really interesting. Firstly, I don't think there should be permanent Maori representation in government.
But there's much more of a cultural amalgamation in NZ than here. For example, it's a big thing to do the haka whether from Maori, European or mixed.
No. Every 'race' has unique circumstances.
Only Indigenous Australians can point to a continued presence on this continent for more than 250 years.The difference between here and NZ is really interesting. Firstly, I don't think there should be permanent Maori representation in government.
But there's much more of a cultural amalgamation in NZ than here. For example, it's a big thing to do the haka whether from Maori, European or mixed.
No. Every 'race' has unique circumstances.
In the NZ example they hold elections but that is a more established system with a greater number of senators than Australia would likely commit to.How many Senate Seats for Indigenous Reps? 1? 2?
How are they chosen? 1 nominated by the opposition and 1 nominated by the government?
In the NZ example they hold elections but that is a more established system with a greater number of senators than Australia would likely commit to.
I'd imagine advocates would request 2 senate seats as that most closely matches the ~3% indigenous population. You would assume that the senator(s) would become a proxy spokesperson for indigenous affairs, noting that like every other group of people in the country the population is made up of people with different ideas and competing interests.
But there's much more of a cultural amalgamation in NZ than here. For example, it's a big thing to do the haka whether from Maori, European or mixed.
dont think i need to explain statements.
dont think i need to explain statements.