An open letter to the Club

Remove this Banner Ad

Feb 2, 2001
21,243
5,393
Valhalla
AFL Club
Collingwood
Other Teams
VFL Magpies
As a near 20 year member of BigFooty and former Collingwood Board Moderator, I hope you will allow me this therapeutic indulgence:



Dear Collingwood FC,


DISCLAIMERS
We understand that we need to further replenish the top 6 talent that can win you flags and that Grundy, De Goey and Moore need more friends in this regard.

We appreciate the pointy end of the draft usually gets you these players.

I’d suggest that the trading team expected much more than what we got.

We acknowledge that the trade period is not yet over and we’ll still shift picks around.

We know the players traded out had flaws (defensively especially), that footy is a business and that they weren’t untradeable.

We note that the list sizes have shrunk and as has the player cap.

We acknowledge that moving on these players will clear up space for potential trades or free agents.

We also get that there may have been mitigating circumstances with regards to ‘HUB life’ that may have made some positions untenable and that there are simply things that we cannot know.


SO THEN WHY ARE WE SO ANGRY?
Because the above justifications aside, you simply cannot trade out so negligently below market value!

The current deal has seen us trade out Treloar, Stephenson, Phillips and Atu effectively for a mid to late first round pick (14) and a future second round pick (say in the mid to late 30’s). The Pick 65 for Phillips carries practically no points and we won’t use it. There isn’t a Collingwood supporter alive who thinks this passes the pub test!

In the past, we’ve had times to trade out players for behavioural concerns in the late 2000’s and early 2010’s, such as Tarrant and Shaw, but we got fair compensation by way of Pick 8 and Taylor Adams respectively.

But us getting horribly below market value on Thursday has actually been a slow-moving train wreck in the making. Our more recent trades in the Ned Guy era have been with Sam Murray 2017 that inexplicably involved a second round pick in the future for an NEAFL standard player who couldn’t get a game at Sydney, the loss of two first rounders in getting an ageing Beams with concerns, a pedestrian 2019 period with lots of noise and now the biggest fire sale in the history of trading. Our negotiations have been particularly weak since the 2015 trade period, which coincides with the Gubby Allen period and Ned Guy’s arrival.

There were recent claims that the recent Geelong final has prompted the sudden need to push contracted players out for draft and/or salary cap gain, but last year we had last year we had contracted players in Scharenberg, Phillips, Cox and Aish getting the tap on the shoulder from the Club, with Aish ultimately being traded. There were also murmurings of trading Treloar to the Gold Coast for a high pick just after the ink dried on his contract.

The claims that this is a sudden pivot are demonstrably false.

With regards to getting clearing cap space for potential FA / trades next year, we’ve been told this all before, yet have watched the likes of Charlie Dixon, Tom Lynch and Jeremy Cameron walk on by to other clubs despite the fact that we haven’t had a decent key position forward for close to 10 years.
Given the extremely low value of the recent trades, I’m interested to know how we trade in this ‘big fish’ given that we’ll likely need high amounts of capital for drafting Nick Daicos. They’ll presumably need to be unrestricted free agents only.

And on Tom Lynch, we know for a fact that Ned Guy was at his parents’ house and that Nathan Buckley caught up with him, so it is disgraceful for Geoff Walsh to claim that we never had any interest. Then Guy and Walsh continually feeding the spin that that we’re well positioned with “two first round picks” as though we just picked up both Pick 14 and Pick 16 is nothing short of pathetic.
Treating us like idiots right now isn’t helpful to your cause!


LIST MANAGER
Ned Guy was brought in in 2017 to ironically fix our salary cap issues and yet all of the current contracts causing issues relate to players that we’ve tried to get off our list in the past 2 years. Mason Cox’s trigger, Treloar’s massively back-ended contract, Stephenson’s back ended contract, Phillips getting paid miles over his worth, are all one his watch. As is the Beams into 4 years renegotiation.

As for Guy’s negotiation ability, that’s been covered above, but the desperation conveyed by Ned and his team was palpable and ultimately resulted in one of the biggest lose-win negotiations across 3 clubs in history.

Were he let go, there would be no suitors for his services as a list manager in opposition teams. His position is untenable.


GENERAL MANAGER
Geoff Walsh has given us tremendous service over the years and once upon a time nutted out some great trade results. Unfortunately his past 4 years involved in trading have been extremely poor and he seemingly has one foot in retirement. His disrespect to Collingwood fans on Ed’s breakfast show was unacceptable.


COACH
It is an indictment on the coach that I believe both Stephenson and Treloar with regards to the calls suggesting that they seek a trade and in the case of Treloar, that the players don’t want him there. He has form with his treatment of Heath Shaw.

On top of that behaviour, he is a coach that was appointment without due process, who has been afforded one of the longest stints of any coach without a Premiership. Most fans would acknowledge that he has strengths, but also significant weaknesses, particularly by way of being an exceedingly poor match day coach, who is not helped by having a bevy of best mates who are ‘yes men’ and never bring any ideas to the fore.

We will likely go into 2021 with diminished expectations with a probable and subsequent contract extension and the same ol’ same ol’ coaching staff who offer no contrary ideas or solutions.


PRESIDENT
When Ed came to us with the motto “Only the best”. We didn’t realise that he actually meant, “only the best mates”. The appointments of Buckley and his hand-picked team of mates, Geoff Walsh post the ‘Captains Call’ of Gubby Allen and of Ned Guy who had literally no list management experience before joining Collingwood, are all appointments by the President and were undertaken without due process.

For all the good that Ed did for us from 1999 and into the current century, we are and continue to be at the behest of the President and his many Captains Calls. Whilst the Board is an impressive list of business leaders, there would be a query over if there could possibly be sufficient numbers to question one of McGuire’s decisions.

So here we are, staring down the barrel of 2021, with the coach coming out of contract at year’s end. We’ve traded out two definite starting 22 players, potentially 3, so then we have our President with an excuse to justify another 2 or 3 years into the 2020’s for his mate Nathan as we “rebuild”, meaning that Buckley will end up become the longest serving coach in history not to have won a flag.

Another major issue is McGuire’s desire to fully comply with the soft cap. There’s nothing wrong with paying some tax for quality football requirements if we run a bit over and it brings competitive advantage. We are not a ‘for profit’ entity.

We were on seemingly track to good processes after Peter Murphy’s review, but regressed to type rapidly thereafter.

We need to bring in the process that makes the “only the best” motto an actuality with particular regard to the list manager, football manager and coach. If that requires a new President, then now is the time for that change.


CONCLUSION
We the members and fans are mortified at recent events, evidenced by a similar pattern of recent ineptitude and with a sense of powerlessness as we stand by and wait for more of the same. If you're taken aback by the fact that we ain't falling for the usual spin, then please re-read the above and take action.


FIGJAM (aka. JtP from EB&W)
 
All good stuff - aside from the obvious (list management issues) , good to see the mention of the mates culture with the assistants and the lack of spending in areas that could easily have been the difference with some silverware.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

All good stuff - aside from the obvious (list management issues) , good to see the mention of the mates culture with the assistants and the lack of spending in areas that could easily have been the difference with some silverware.

That is Spot On. It's just a Place where Mates hang out Even when they have No Clue what they are doing
 
Well said.

I get and applaud the fact that we didn’t hide that we had deficiencies that needed to be fixed. I was afraid that we’d blame it all on COVID and hublife.

But god the way we attacked trade period, the way we treated people and the fact that we didn’t just own our previous mistakes is just unacceptable.


On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
 
CONCLUSION
We the members and fans are mortified at recent events, evidenced by a similar pattern of recent ineptitude and with a sense of powerlessness as we stand by and wait for more of the same. If you're taken aback by the fact that we ain't falling for the usual spin, then please re-read the above and take action.


FIGJAM (aka. JtP from EB&W)

sooooo.......re-read and take action. stern stuff...
 
As a near 20 year member of BigFooty and former Collingwood Board Moderator, I hope you will allow me this therapeutic indulgence:



Dear Collingwood FC,


DISCLAIMERS
We understand that we need to further replenish the top 6 talent that can win you flags and that Grundy, De Goey and Moore need more friends in this regard.

We appreciate the pointy end of the draft usually gets you these players.

I’d suggest that the trading team expected much more than what we got.

We acknowledge that the trade period is not yet over and we’ll still shift picks around.

We know the players traded out had flaws (defensively especially), that footy is a business and that they weren’t untradeable.

We note that the list sizes have shrunk and as has the player cap.

We acknowledge that moving on these players will clear up space for potential trades or free agents.

We also get that there may have been mitigating circumstances with regards to ‘HUB life’ that may have made some positions untenable and that there are simply things that we cannot know.


SO THEN WHY ARE WE SO ANGRY?
Because the above justifications aside, you simply cannot trade out so negligently below market value!

The current deal has seen us trade out Treloar, Stephenson, Phillips and Atu effectively for a mid to late first round pick (14) and a future second round pick (say in the mid to late 30’s). The Pick 65 for Phillips carries practically no points and we won’t use it. There isn’t a Collingwood supporter alive who thinks this passes the pub test!

In the past, we’ve had times to trade out players for behavioural concerns in the late 2000’s and early 2010’s, such as Tarrant and Shaw, but we got fair compensation by way of Pick 8 and Taylor Adams respectively.

But us getting horribly below market value on Thursday has actually been a slow-moving train wreck in the making. Our more recent trades in the Ned Guy era have been with Sam Murray 2017 that inexplicably involved a second round pick in the future for an NEAFL standard player who couldn’t get a game at Sydney, the loss of two first rounders in getting an ageing Beams with concerns, a pedestrian 2019 period with lots of noise and now the biggest fire sale in the history of trading. Our negotiations have been particularly weak since the 2015 trade period, which coincides with the Gubby Allen period and Ned Guy’s arrival.

There were recent claims that the recent Geelong final has prompted the sudden need to push contracted players out for draft and/or salary cap gain, but last year we had last year we had contracted players in Scharenberg, Phillips, Cox and Aish getting the tap on the shoulder from the Club, with Aish ultimately being traded. There were also murmurings of trading Treloar to the Gold Coast for a high pick just after the ink dried on his contract.

The claims that this is a sudden pivot are demonstrably false.

With regards to getting clearing cap space for potential FA / trades next year, we’ve been told this all before, yet have watched the likes of Charlie Dixon, Tom Lynch and Jeremy Cameron walk on by to other clubs despite the fact that we haven’t had a decent key position forward for close to 10 years.
Given the extremely low value of the recent trades, I’m interested to know how we trade in this ‘big fish’ given that we’ll likely need high amounts of capital for drafting Nick Daicos. They’ll presumably need to be unrestricted free agents only.

And on Tom Lynch, we know for a fact that Ned Guy was at his parents’ house and that Nathan Buckley caught up with him, so it is disgraceful for Geoff Walsh to claim that we never had any interest. Then Guy and Walsh continually feeding the spin that that we’re well positioned with “two first round picks” as though we just picked up both Pick 14 and Pick 16 is nothing short of pathetic.
Treating us like idiots right now isn’t helpful to your cause!


LIST MANAGER
Ned Guy was brought in in 2017 to ironically fix our salary cap issues and yet all of the current contracts causing issues relate to players that we’ve tried to get off our list in the past 2 years. Mason Cox’s trigger, Treloar’s massively back-ended contract, Stephenson’s back ended contract, Phillips getting paid miles over his worth, are all one his watch. As is the Beams into 4 years renegotiation.

As for Guy’s negotiation ability, that’s been covered above, but the desperation conveyed by Ned and his team was palpable and ultimately resulted in one of the biggest lose-win negotiations across 3 clubs in history.

Were he let go, there would be no suitors for his services as a list manager in opposition teams. His position is untenable.


GENERAL MANAGER
Geoff Walsh has given us tremendous service over the years and once upon a time nutted out some great trade results. Unfortunately his past 4 years involved in trading have been extremely poor and he seemingly has one foot in retirement. His disrespect to Collingwood fans on Ed’s breakfast show was unacceptable.


COACH
It is an indictment on the coach that I believe both Stephenson and Treloar with regards to the calls suggesting that they seek a trade and in the case of Treloar, that the players don’t want him there. He has form with his treatment of Heath Shaw.

On top of that behaviour, he is a coach that was appointment without due process, who has been afforded one of the longest stints of any coach without a Premiership. Most fans would acknowledge that he has strengths, but also significant weaknesses, particularly by way of being an exceedingly poor match day coach, who is not helped by having a bevy of best mates who are ‘yes men’ and never bring any ideas to the fore.

We will likely go into 2021 with diminished expectations with a probable and subsequent contract extension and the same ol’ same ol’ coaching staff who offer no contrary ideas or solutions.


PRESIDENT
When Ed came to us with the motto “Only the best”. We didn’t realise that he actually meant, “only the best mates”. The appointments of Buckley and his hand-picked team of mates, Geoff Walsh post the ‘Captains Call’ of Gubby Allen and of Ned Guy who had literally no list management experience before joining Collingwood, are all appointments by the President and were undertaken without due process.

For all the good that Ed did for us from 1999 and into the current century, we are and continue to be at the behest of the President and his many Captains Calls. Whilst the Board is an impressive list of business leaders, there would be a query over if there could possibly be sufficient numbers to question one of McGuire’s decisions.

So here we are, staring down the barrel of 2021, with the coach coming out of contract at year’s end. We’ve traded out two definite starting 22 players, potentially 3, so then we have our President with an excuse to justify another 2 or 3 years into the 2020’s for his mate Nathan as we “rebuild”, meaning that Buckley will end up become the longest serving coach in history not to have won a flag.

Another major issue is McGuire’s desire to fully comply with the soft cap. There’s nothing wrong with paying some tax for quality football requirements if we run a bit over and it brings competitive advantage. We are not a ‘for profit’ entity.

We were on seemingly track to good processes after Peter Murphy’s review, but regressed to type rapidly thereafter.

We need to bring in the process that makes the “only the best” motto an actuality with particular regard to the list manager, football manager and coach. If that requires a new President, then now is the time for that change.


CONCLUSION
We the members and fans are mortified at recent events, evidenced by a similar pattern of recent ineptitude and with a sense of powerlessness as we stand by and wait for more of the same. If you're taken aback by the fact that we ain't falling for the usual spin, then please re-read the above and take action.


FIGJAM (aka. JtP from EB&W)
Great job

Geoff Walsh had the temerity to say we had acquired "a suite of future first and second round picks"
 
As a near 20 year member of BigFooty and former Collingwood Board Moderator, I hope you will allow me this therapeutic indulgence:



Dear Collingwood FC,


DISCLAIMERS
We understand that we need to further replenish the top 6 talent that can win you flags and that Grundy, De Goey and Moore need more friends in this regard.

We appreciate the pointy end of the draft usually gets you these players.

I’d suggest that the trading team expected much more than what we got.

We acknowledge that the trade period is not yet over and we’ll still shift picks around.

We know the players traded out had flaws (defensively especially), that footy is a business and that they weren’t untradeable.

We note that the list sizes have shrunk and as has the player cap.

We acknowledge that moving on these players will clear up space for potential trades or free agents.

We also get that there may have been mitigating circumstances with regards to ‘HUB life’ that may have made some positions untenable and that there are simply things that we cannot know.


SO THEN WHY ARE WE SO ANGRY?
Because the above justifications aside, you simply cannot trade out so negligently below market value!

The current deal has seen us trade out Treloar, Stephenson, Phillips and Atu effectively for a mid to late first round pick (14) and a future second round pick (say in the mid to late 30’s). The Pick 65 for Phillips carries practically no points and we won’t use it. There isn’t a Collingwood supporter alive who thinks this passes the pub test!

In the past, we’ve had times to trade out players for behavioural concerns in the late 2000’s and early 2010’s, such as Tarrant and Shaw, but we got fair compensation by way of Pick 8 and Taylor Adams respectively.

But us getting horribly below market value on Thursday has actually been a slow-moving train wreck in the making. Our more recent trades in the Ned Guy era have been with Sam Murray 2017 that inexplicably involved a second round pick in the future for an NEAFL standard player who couldn’t get a game at Sydney, the loss of two first rounders in getting an ageing Beams with concerns, a pedestrian 2019 period with lots of noise and now the biggest fire sale in the history of trading. Our negotiations have been particularly weak since the 2015 trade period, which coincides with the Gubby Allen period and Ned Guy’s arrival.

There were recent claims that the recent Geelong final has prompted the sudden need to push contracted players out for draft and/or salary cap gain, but last year we had last year we had contracted players in Scharenberg, Phillips, Cox and Aish getting the tap on the shoulder from the Club, with Aish ultimately being traded. There were also murmurings of trading Treloar to the Gold Coast for a high pick just after the ink dried on his contract.

The claims that this is a sudden pivot are demonstrably false.

With regards to getting clearing cap space for potential FA / trades next year, we’ve been told this all before, yet have watched the likes of Charlie Dixon, Tom Lynch and Jeremy Cameron walk on by to other clubs despite the fact that we haven’t had a decent key position forward for close to 10 years.
Given the extremely low value of the recent trades, I’m interested to know how we trade in this ‘big fish’ given that we’ll likely need high amounts of capital for drafting Nick Daicos. They’ll presumably need to be unrestricted free agents only.

And on Tom Lynch, we know for a fact that Ned Guy was at his parents’ house and that Nathan Buckley caught up with him, so it is disgraceful for Geoff Walsh to claim that we never had any interest. Then Guy and Walsh continually feeding the spin that that we’re well positioned with “two first round picks” as though we just picked up both Pick 14 and Pick 16 is nothing short of pathetic.
Treating us like idiots right now isn’t helpful to your cause!


LIST MANAGER
Ned Guy was brought in in 2017 to ironically fix our salary cap issues and yet all of the current contracts causing issues relate to players that we’ve tried to get off our list in the past 2 years. Mason Cox’s trigger, Treloar’s massively back-ended contract, Stephenson’s back ended contract, Phillips getting paid miles over his worth, are all one his watch. As is the Beams into 4 years renegotiation.

As for Guy’s negotiation ability, that’s been covered above, but the desperation conveyed by Ned and his team was palpable and ultimately resulted in one of the biggest lose-win negotiations across 3 clubs in history.

Were he let go, there would be no suitors for his services as a list manager in opposition teams. His position is untenable.


GENERAL MANAGER
Geoff Walsh has given us tremendous service over the years and once upon a time nutted out some great trade results. Unfortunately his past 4 years involved in trading have been extremely poor and he seemingly has one foot in retirement. His disrespect to Collingwood fans on Ed’s breakfast show was unacceptable.


COACH
It is an indictment on the coach that I believe both Stephenson and Treloar with regards to the calls suggesting that they seek a trade and in the case of Treloar, that the players don’t want him there. He has form with his treatment of Heath Shaw.

On top of that behaviour, he is a coach that was appointment without due process, who has been afforded one of the longest stints of any coach without a Premiership. Most fans would acknowledge that he has strengths, but also significant weaknesses, particularly by way of being an exceedingly poor match day coach, who is not helped by having a bevy of best mates who are ‘yes men’ and never bring any ideas to the fore.

We will likely go into 2021 with diminished expectations with a probable and subsequent contract extension and the same ol’ same ol’ coaching staff who offer no contrary ideas or solutions.


PRESIDENT
When Ed came to us with the motto “Only the best”. We didn’t realise that he actually meant, “only the best mates”. The appointments of Buckley and his hand-picked team of mates, Geoff Walsh post the ‘Captains Call’ of Gubby Allen and of Ned Guy who had literally no list management experience before joining Collingwood, are all appointments by the President and were undertaken without due process.

For all the good that Ed did for us from 1999 and into the current century, we are and continue to be at the behest of the President and his many Captains Calls. Whilst the Board is an impressive list of business leaders, there would be a query over if there could possibly be sufficient numbers to question one of McGuire’s decisions.

So here we are, staring down the barrel of 2021, with the coach coming out of contract at year’s end. We’ve traded out two definite starting 22 players, potentially 3, so then we have our President with an excuse to justify another 2 or 3 years into the 2020’s for his mate Nathan as we “rebuild”, meaning that Buckley will end up become the longest serving coach in history not to have won a flag.

Another major issue is McGuire’s desire to fully comply with the soft cap. There’s nothing wrong with paying some tax for quality football requirements if we run a bit over and it brings competitive advantage. We are not a ‘for profit’ entity.

We were on seemingly track to good processes after Peter Murphy’s review, but regressed to type rapidly thereafter.

We need to bring in the process that makes the “only the best” motto an actuality with particular regard to the list manager, football manager and coach. If that requires a new President, then now is the time for that change.


CONCLUSION
We the members and fans are mortified at recent events, evidenced by a similar pattern of recent ineptitude and with a sense of powerlessness as we stand by and wait for more of the same. If you're taken aback by the fact that we ain't falling for the usual spin, then please re-read the above and take action.


FIGJAM (aka. JtP from EB&W)

You should be ashamed. You must blindly support those in charge of the club no matter what they do.

BLIND LOYAL OBEDIENCE !
 
For a consummate media man Buckley sure is thin on the ground at the moment.

Personally I prefer my leaders to front-up in a crisis.

Are we sure he’s not Tweeting from Hawaii?
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Nailed it FIGJAM. Great to hear from you here, even under these woeful circumstances.

It pains me so much to criticise Bucks as I've had enormous respect and admiration for him for so long. But his quarantine breach, his handling of this whole affair, his virtual silence this week... they all just compound the issues with his coaching, to the point where he just has to go. It's time.
 
Basically I agree with everything the poster says. It reminds me very much of Adelaide FC blowing up after their grand final loss to Richmond. I view our loss to Geelong much differently - hub life, exhaustion after the West Coast and the quarantining and travelling back to Queensland and the injuries during the season and Sidebottom's loss due to the birth of his child, all finally catching up with us. In my view the football department has completed overreacted to the Geelong loss. Adelaide did a similar thing after the Richmond loss. Richmond now have a further two premierships to show for it so why subject the Adelaide FC to a mentally straining training camp just to rub salt into the wounds after the Richmond loss? Collingwood should have learned from the Adelaide situation but they seem not to have. Instead the football department is intent on blowing up the club just like Adelaide did. Of course if we win again next year all will be forgiven but I doubt it with the loss of two elite players and the best we have to show for it is a number 14 draft pick in the national draft. It's my view that there are three people in the football department whose positions are now untenable - the coach Nathan Buckley, the football manager Geoff Walsh and head of the list management team, Ned Guy.
 
Instead the football department is intent on blowing up the club just like Adelaide did.

I dont know if i've seen a more ridiculous statement... yeh i must have, I read BF regularly so I must have. "intent on blowing up".... as the people in charge of the football department would intend to blow it up. Vent time? yeh yeh yeh, always time to vent on BF.
 
That's it?! The last 10 years?!

How about the previous half a century of a sh1tshow?

I agree with every word in the op, however there is still plenty of BF real estate to take up with umbrage of this embarrassment of a club. In fact there is not enough real estate in this universe to facilitate the deplorableness of this club.

Own it Collingwood, you've slowly but surely over a very long period finally alienated the most resilient fan base on the planet.

ONLY FLAGS will reap redemption from here on in, even then the previous angst from us will be entirely justified.

I imagine past legends like my ancestor the late great Daniel Minogue would be turning in their graves. This is the straw that has broken the camels back!

OWN IT COLLINGWOOD!
 
thats a well constructed letter and nails most supporters sentiments.

i've not posted for an eternity but feel compelled to throw my 2 cents in. I think the reasons we got well under market value is that all clubs knew we were under significant cap pressure, and most likely we'd have well exceeded it, so we had little bargaining power.

Therefore there was no urgency from other teams to do a deal, they knew if they strung it out to the last minute, we'd fold and accept whatever was offered or risk going over the cap. IMO, the club couldnt show their hand publicly, though most clubs knew it anyway which is why there were no comments throughout.

In terms of what was conveyed to Stevo and Treloar, clearly they had to move them on for cap reasons and so basically (IMO anyway) they had to get them to resent the club and make coming back untenable otherwise both Treloar and Stevo wanted to stay (and why not given they were contracted). I feel that Bucks was dealt a sh1t sandwich and had to make them feel unwanted.

I apportion an element of blame to the money hungry players over the last few years. Those who held the club to ransom to get better deals. You could argue the admin should have handled that better and maybe let someone walk but clubs like Geelong and Hawthorn have always had buy in from players to accept unders. And i agree bad decisions like Beams, Wells and Mayne hasn't helped, though when we got Wells and Mayne, we had no cap issues (they just wasted free space on the wrong players).

Main concern now is how morale is (or can be) restored otherwise we might be in for a long ordinary season next year, which might mean its the end for Buckley. Although others don't like Buckley, and everyone's entitled to an opinion, I'd like to see him finally have the ultimate success that continues to elude him. I remember him battling alone for about 6 years in sub standard teams and so success in my mind would be fitting. As it appears, it won't turn out that way.

Also fwiw, i dont think our list is disastrous but an extra, and earlier, first rounder this year would've helped considerably. Maybe we'll get that by swapping next years first.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top