Marc Murplhy V Dale thomas and Scott Pendelbury

[james Dean]

Where as Kennedy will be in the top10 draft pick dud pile with Luke Livingston, and Jason Wild.

And Dale Thomas

 

[NeRFaHoLIc]

And Dale Thomas

No prize for second place mate. Try better next time.

 

[Firestorm]

Thomas and Pendlebury were inspired choices, everyone screamed about both of them, Ellis was supposed to be better, Pendles wasn't in the top 10 etc

Very happy

 

[andypie]

Your thoughts from last years Draft!!!

murphy was generall accepted to be the pick of that draft and collingwood would have loved to have got him. he is the better of the 3 by far but given the low stocks of both teams at the time of the draft, i think carlton would prefer those two and kennedy aswell rather than just murphy and kennedy. so i would rather have picks 2 and 5 rather than pick 1.

 

[toommy]

Marc murphy oozes talent, he is better then thomas.

carlton supporters act as if we passed up on murphy to get thomas.we would have taken murphy if we had the 1st pick,but if kennedy becomes a luke livingston i would be concerned if i were carlton.

 

[Jeremias]

Yawn. Another Murphy vs. Thomas thread.
Why don't I see Carlton supporters starting any Kennedy vs. Pendlebury threads?

Because Kennedy is a KPP and Pendelbury is a midfielder...

 

[Thrawn]

C'mon i could get 30 disposals in that **** Carlton midfield. It's hardly note worthy.

No you couldn't.

Watch last year's WC vs Carlton match, against the best. For a first year player, his match was that of a 23 year old's.

 

[Firestorm]

CAREER STATS:


Pendlebury Thomas H Shaw AVERAGE AGE: 20 - GAMES: 19.7 - DISPOSALS: 16.1

Walker Murphy Gibbs: AVERAGE AGE: 19 - GAMES: 24.7 - DISPOSALS: 15.3


Very even at the moment

 

[trueblue_91]

CAREER STATS:


Pendlebury Thomas H Shaw AVERAGE AGE: 20 - GAMES: 19.7 - DISPOSALS: 16.1

Walker Murphy Gibbs: AVERAGE AGE: 19 - GAMES: 24.7 - DISPOSALS: 15.3


Very even at the moment

We can't really compare those stats. Gibbs and Heath Shaw are currently playing off the backline and thomas is a forward. So stats don't really matter. It is what you do with the ball

 

[Firestorm]

We can't really compare those stats. Gibbs and Heath Shaw are currently playing off the backline and thomas is a forward. So stats don't really matter. It is what you do with the ball

They all have good skills and will end up in the midfield, it's as good a guideline as you will get this early in their careers

 

[KnockOut]

CAREER STATS:


Pendlebury Thomas H Shaw AVERAGE AGE: 20 - GAMES: 19.7 - DISPOSALS: 16.1

Walker Murphy Gibbs: AVERAGE AGE: 19 - GAMES: 24.7 - DISPOSALS: 15.3


Very even at the moment

There you go, that stat has been bought up in two threads I've read.
Murphy is the most promising draft pick of the last 3 years. Walker is extremely underrated by opposition and is improving on his faboulous 2006 form. Gibbs is racking up 15+ possies without even getting in the midfield. Seriously this is a no contest.

Carlton by KnockOut!

 

[TorresIsGod]

I want Heaters running off Half Back for Carlton

 

[parrot]

CAREER STATS:


Pendlebury Thomas H Shaw AVERAGE AGE: 20 - GAMES: 19.7 - DISPOSALS: 16.1

Walker Murphy Gibbs: AVERAGE AGE: 19 - GAMES: 24.7 - DISPOSALS: 15.3


Very even at the moment

Walker, Murph and Gibbs are about 4-5 talent classes above the Collingwood trio. It's just not a sensible comparison.

 

[Cassius_Clay]

Pendlebury > Walker >> Kennedy

Will the Blues regret drafting Kennedy instead of Pendlebury? I think yes

 

[parrot]

..Will the Blues regret drafting Kennedy instead of Pendlebury? ..

Um.. No.

 

[NeRFaHoLIc]

Will the Blues regret drafting Kennedy instead of Pendlebury? I think yes

Um.. No.

Yeh I'm with parrot...


They won't regret drafting Kennedy ahead of Pendlebury, they'll regret drafting Kennedy altogether.

 

[always right]

Another Parrot insecurity thread. Just hilarious really. Hmmm...where have I heard that before?

 

[TorresIsGod]

Yeh I'm with parrot...


They won't regret drafting Kennedy ahead of Pendlebury, they'll regret drafting Kennedy altogether.

We may regret drafting Kennedy altogether, but still Josh Kennedy > Travisaurus

Just out of curiosity NeRF, what is your IQ, you seem to be a very, very smart person.

 

[parrot]

..Hmmm...where have I heard that before?

Gee the Bulldogs chip-kick gameplan unravelled in spectacular fashion, didn't it.

 

[TorresIsGod]

Tom Hawkins on one leg with one arm and a blindfold > Josh Kennedy

 

[NeRFaHoLIc]

Gee the Bulldogs chip-kick gameplan unravelled in spectacular fashion, didn't it.

Carlton's make Lance captain idea backfired pretty quickly didn't it?

Worse than Richie Vandenberg? Not quite, but almost.

 

[TorresIsGod]

Carlton's make Lance captain idea backfired pretty quickly didn't it?

Worse than Richie Vandenberg? Not quite, but almost.

No-one could be worse than Richie Vandenberg, but Carlton should have made Mar... I mean Josh Kennedy captain

 

[always right]

Gee the Bulldogs chip-kick gameplan unravelled in spectacular fashion, didn't it.

Not one our better efforts granted. By the way, how'd your pumped-up tryhards do against the team we accounted for comfortably the previous week? Nice gesture by Denis playing Lance on the first gamer. Lance would have learned a lot from the kid. Interesting looking at both their body shapes. One still has a fair bit of puppy fat to lose. Hawkins on the other hand looked pretty trim.

 

[NeRFaHoLIc]

Not one our better efforts granted. By the way, how'd your pumped-up tryhards do against the team we accounted for comfortably the previous week? Nice gesture by Denis playing Lance on the first gamer. Lance would have learned a lot from the kid. Interesting looking at both their body shapes. One still has a fair bit of puppy fat to lose. Hawkins on the other hand looked pretty trim.

 

[parrot]

Not one our better efforts granted. ....

Perhaps they lost focus after they kept talking up each other last week. I lost count of how many Bulldogs players called one of their team-mates "..better than Judd..". I guess chip-kicking is only one skill of the game.