Review Crows vs NM: The Good, the bad and ... the stultifyingly DULL.

Who played well against North Melbourne?

  • Sam Berry

  • Jordon Butts

  • Jordan Dawson

  • Tom Doedee

  • Darcy Fogarty

  • Will Hamill

  • Jackson Hately

  • Mitch Hinge

  • Chayce Jones (sub)

  • Ben Keays

  • Rory Laird

  • Shane McAdam

  • Ned McHenry

  • Wayne Milera

  • Nick Murray

  • Reilly O'Brien

  • Patrick Parnell

  • Josh Rachele

  • James Rowe

  • Harry Schoenberg

  • Brodie Smith

  • Jake Soligo

  • Taylor Walker


Results are only viewable after voting.

Remove this Banner Ad

Want to know why Matt Crouch's disposal numbers are meaningless? Look no further

Crouch last week - 5 score involvements (31 disposals)
Schoenberg this week - 4 score involvements (13 disposals)
 

Log in to remove this ad.

I really liked Murray’s work in ruck. He’s so mobile when the ball hits the ground.
Don’t reckon Murray lost a Contest all day down back either , he can be at least as good as Harto as that 2nd shut down tall

His kick has good penetration too if he keeps it simple

No need to spend capital on a trade for a key defender , happy with more depth though with a later pick
 
Good
1st win on the Apple Isle, 57 points
Fog outstanding, Tex Ok as well.
Another good Dawson game, believing the swans supporters now that we stole him...meh you deserve it for the part you played in Tippetgate
Team did what they had to

Bad
beat ourselves sometimes and made North look competent in patch's.
Consistency still an issue but at least we kicked more goals than points in an open ground.

Real Bad
North.
 
Aaron Hall from North had 38 disposals and 1171 meters gained and, I felt, no influence on the game whatsoever
 
Good
-Fog has now had a month of very good games.
  • Schoenberg had a much improved second half
  • Berry is a tackling machine, as is Laird.
  • Dawson is just so good
  • Jones as sub was very good. Straight in next week.

Bad
-Hamill getting concussed again
-The standard of game

Ugly
-North. Yuck.
 
The good.

Im reluctant to give too much in the good column. Because frankly, this wasn't that impress and North are a literal basket-case. Half the players look disinterested and at times they moved the ball with ease against us.

But good:
Murray in ruck. The way he moved in chasing the ball and breaking packs open, could we build up his fitness to become a big bodied pinch hitting mid.

The meh:
the whole performance was meaningless. endeavour really was what one us the game. skills were poor, players were inconsistent. I'd give Berry credit for the tackles but when you are playing against disinterested players barely moving faster than fat unfit witches hats its hard to give him much credit. But at least he is consistent.

Until we show anything against good teams we are doing nothing.

The Bad:
McAdam has become too interested in taking the spectacular mark than actually doing anything else.

The Ugly:
The fact the club will use this game to wall paper over the cracks and use it as some example of heading in the right direction.
 
Good
1st win on the Apple Isle, 57 points
Fog outstanding, Tex Ok as well.
Another good Dawson game, believing the swans supporters now that we stole him...meh you deserve it for the part you played in Tippetgate
Team did what they had to

Bad
beat ourselves sometimes and made North look competent in patch's.
Consistency still an issue but at least we kicked more goals than points in an open ground.

Real Bad
North.
2nd win. First at Hobart.

On Pixel 6 Pro using BigFooty.com mobile app
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Even though it was North, was smiling at Fogartys game today. Was awesome to see his confidence sky high. The Fogarty era has commenced.

Also, nice win on the punt..
View attachment 1433406
Should have included Fogarty 20+. You could retire.
 
Back
Top