Remove this Banner Ad

List Mgmt. 2025 Draft & Trade Thread - Picks 31, 32, 42, 60 and 71

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
From what has been posted its looking likely to be 2 First Round picks and Florent for Curnow as it stands. Might be some minor picks exchanged to suit current and future academy/FS needs for both clubs, ie our picks next year for their picks this year

They wont accept that imo they will likely consider Florent as just steak knives to the deal.
 
They wont accept that imo they will likely consider Florent as just steak knives to the deal.
Ah well, they can just get no player and worse picks with the Cats or keep a disgruntled Curnow when they aren't challenging anyway.
 
From what has been posted its looking likely to be 2 First Round picks and Florent for Curnow as it stands. Might be some minor picks exchanged to suit current and future academy/FS needs for both clubs, ie our picks next year for their picks this year
2 picks and a player? Sign me up!

I'm sure Carlton will hate it, but it seems like that's the best offer they'll get. So it just becomes a debate for them about how much they want to hold a player who doesn't want to be there.
 
Ah well, they can just get no player and worse picks with the Cats or keep a disgruntled Curnow when they aren't challenging anyway.

Given Rowbottom has ruled out a move and no other names over the weekend have leaked.

Its pretty much looking like the purposed deal mentioned a week ago 2x firsts Hayward/Florent add a F2 if Hayward changes his mind.

Trade week could be done within 3 days.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

There wont be a trade request or nomination. The deal will be done if Carlton agree with the offer
I think if you didn’t have dean and walker you would be more likely to hold him.

With these two coming in you can vastly improve your position and regeneration in trading him…
 
That is by intention
I don’t think so. I firmly believe the reason the “official” offers are taking time is because the deal won’t be a simple one between Sydney and Carlton - it’s likely to involve multiple clubs, which means it takes time to ensure all parties are satisfied with the moving pieces.

I also think it’s a bit naïve to assume Carlton and Sydney haven’t already had discussions and established a baseline understanding of what would be needed to get a trade done.

This is a major move for the Swans, bringing in a player of Curnow’s calibre (and also for Carlton to be trading him out). They wouldn’t be leaving it to the last minute without a well-structured plan which includes contingencies like Plan B, C, and D.
 
Depends last reports were Collingwood are baulking at offering their 3rd round pick which is 61

If that’s the offer send him to the PSD even 61 is a terrible out one
 

Remove this Banner Ad

I don’t think so. I firmly believe the reason the “official” offers are taking time is because the deal won’t be a simple one between Sydney and Carlton - it’s likely to involve multiple clubs, which means it takes time to ensure all parties are satisfied with the moving pieces.

I also think it’s a bit naïve to assume Carlton and Sydney haven’t already had discussions and established a baseline understanding of what would be needed to get a trade done.

This is a major move for the Swans, bringing in a player of Curnow’s calibre (and also for Carlton to be trading him out). They wouldn’t be leaving it to the last minute without a well-structured plan which includes contingencies like Plan B, C, and D.
I didn’t mean you were getting a worse deal.

It’s more pick 11 means you can package up and get ahead of dean and therefore get another top 10 pick in 2025, which is of serious value to YOU more than average pick 11 value…

Same for 2026 first, imagine coming 10th and then with the new rules not being able to match pick 1 bid on walker…. Same reason 2026 first is value able to YOU.

Not saying Charlie will be discount or free, but I get why you are entertaining it given your list profile….
 
If that’s the offer send him to the PSD even 61 is a terrible out one
What is the point in doing this, just ridiculous, rather get something than nothing.

He's an out of contract depth player, not worth making a huge deal and pissing off other clubs and player managers because of it.
 
What is the point in doing this, just ridiculous, rather get something than nothing.

He's an out of contract depth player, not worth making a huge deal and pissing off other clubs and player managers because of it.
We could send him and then resign in him PSD….

Would be hilarious
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

What is the point in doing this, just ridiculous, rather get something than nothing.

He's an out of contract depth player, not worth making a huge deal and pissing off other clubs and player managers because of it.
Pick 61 is nothing though.

Why should Collingwood be allowed to piss off other clubs and player managers by offering up nothing?
 
Pick 61 is nothing though.

Why should Collingwood be allowed to piss off other clubs and player managers by offering up nothing?
Can use it on-traded for Serong or part or some other deal, we paid basically nothing for Rosas and will pay basically nothing for Serong, I'm not sure why we expect Collingwood & Buller to be any different.
 
What is the point in doing this, just ridiculous, rather get something than nothing.

He's an out of contract depth player, not worth making a huge deal and pissing off other clubs and player managers because of it.

Pick 61 is nothing so what’s the difference

Second round (at worst their second for our third) or make a statement.
 
Can use it on-traded for Serong or part or some other deal, we paid basically nothing for Rosas and will pay basically nothing for Serong, I'm not sure why we expect Collingwood & Buller to be any different.

One of those 3 was playing AFL this season. Want to remind me which one?
 
Pick 61 is nothing so what’s the difference

Second round (at worst their second for our third) or make a statement.

What statement is being made here, that we will hold depth players against their will preventing them from playing AFL elsewhere and are difficult to deal with?

GC didn't do it to us for Rosas and I doubt Hawthorn will for Serong.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top