- Moderator
- #679
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

BigFooty AFLW Notice Img
AFLW 2025 - AFLW Trade and Draft - All the player moves
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
team of professional people spending year after year assessing players for a living ......against a random supporter throwing rocks into a pond.........yeah nahCowan is our best get at his pick but overall, our strategy baffles me. Playing it ultra safe the one moment then speculating wildly the next. Will Cowan develop into something more important to our structure than a not so quick HPF? If we think we desperately need more run, what makes Binns a better bet than Hotton? Is Lemmey's level of upside really that good because he looks totally disinterested. I would have preferred we split the Binns pick, TBH.
Depending on the decade, that could be half the league... Saints haven't been recruiting poorly lately, just in the same boat as us in terms of what they want to do with the list.If you're praising what is historically the worst recruiting team in the AFL, while bagging out us, maybe you should possibly reconsider your opinions.
Just a thought.
Apparently they declined.Is Keeler the ruckman zoned to Adelaide academy?
IMO our haul could have easily been Hewett, Clarke, Keeler and Lemmey while throwing less valuable future picks on the table for what seems to be a strong draft next year.Here's an alternative point of view:
-They selected with pick 10 a player that was projected to go 10-15, because he's a massive flog and very inconsistent, but got people excited because noted recruiting geniuses Essendon became interested with pick 4.
-They picked up a tall athlete with mediocre on field performance with pick 31
-They selected a player projected to go 15-30 with pick 35. Not a massive slide in an even draft. A guy who plays a bit forward, a bit in the middle but does neither particularly well.
- They picked a club linked key forward with pick 44. A player whose linked club has a terrible list but still thought he was too s**t to take the last spot on their list even though he was totally free at that point.
Who will be right? Only time will tell.
A good point. People were doing virtual high fives, air kisses, and the whole works in here after the Matthew Watson draft. Full points to anyone who can name the talls we took in that draft (without doing a Google search). We supposedly smashed it.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Duigan at pick 70 was the greatest of that crop. I was actually pumped with who we selected and thought Luke Mitchell was going to be a gun full forward
We are gonna groom him to play down back ..not as a forwardPragmatic draft selections addressed our need for outside run and and a little toughness too, like Lemmy 202cm forward that presents strongly and kicks well, if he develops to potential it will be a massive win.
Well done Nick Austin and team, very happy with the outcome.
I was all in on mcinnes till that knee...........
LoL....have always thought the same thingGeez Austins eyes. White walker?
Cowan one of the highest metres gained run and carry players in the draft not so quick... Binns arguably the best runner in the crop and very fast too not going to add more run... Lemmey who was meant to be a top 5 pick heading into the year and was picked purely on potential upside doesn't have much upside...Cowan is our best get at his pick but overall, our strategy baffles me. Playing it ultra safe the one moment then speculating wildly the next. Will Cowan develop into something more important to our structure than a not so quick HPF? If we think we desperately need more run, what makes Binns a better bet than Hotton? Is Lemmey's level of upside really that good because he looks totally disinterested. I would have preferred we split the Binns pick, TBH.
Inb4 Thy says 'Omg, totally...We've gone hard at addressing our lack of run and outside mids this off-season. And for good reason.
But is anyone else getting '2010 trying to address our dearth of talls in one go' vibes? Or is it just me?
We are gonna groom him to play down back ..not as a forward
Sent from my moto e(7) using Tapatalk
Matt WatsonA good point. People were doing virtual high fives, air kisses, and the whole works in here after the Matthew Watson draft. Full points to anyone who can name the talls we took in that draft (without doing a Google search). We supposedly smashed it.
Surely that's just sensible risk management? Some safer options to guarantee a decent return plus something a bit more speculative that could turn into an outsized gain. One might almost call it a balanced portfolio.Cowan is our best get at his pick but overall, our strategy baffles me. Playing it ultra safe the one moment then speculating wildly the next. Will Cowan develop into something more important to our structure than a not so quick HPF? If we think we desperately need more run, what makes Binns a better bet than Hotton? Is Lemmey's level of upside really that good because he looks totally disinterested. I would have preferred we split the Binns pick, TBH.
Schizophrenic choices on our part, Saints played it perfectly and killed it. I wish we'd learm.
Time will tell but what the Saints just managed is the best tactical drafting I've seen, especially given the relatively limited picks they had and the fact that it wasn't a deep draft.
Why should I give a figg what their draft history is like, don't know, don't care. It would be disingenuous for that to influence my opinion on what they managed in the last two nights. They killed it. At any rate, let's not call the kettle black.
Cowan is our best get at his pick but overall, our strategy baffles me. Playing it ultra safe the one moment then speculating wildly the next. Will Cowan develop into something more important to our structure than a not so quick HPF? If we think we desperately need more run, what makes Binns a better bet than Hotton? Is Lemmey's level of upside really that good because he looks totally disinterested. I would have preferred we split the Binns pick, TBH.
Learn what? How to leapfrog the pick before ours? Sure they had great picks because they had the pick before ours ffs. Austin did an excellent job with what was left at our pick, even trading up for Cowan without selling the farm.Schizophrenic choices on our part, Saints played it perfectly and killed it. I wish we'd learm.
Harry has good footy IQ, natural ability and athleticism to play either end, let’s how he develops. He’s kicking is fine too , so will be a versatile & flexible tall, in 3 or 4 years, he play wherever need most.We are gonna groom him to play down back ..not as a forward
Sent from my moto e(7) using Tapatalk
Austin didn’t get the coaches son?Shame we don't have any picks tomorrow
Still on the board
Szybkowski
D'Aloia
Drury
Gillbee
Gilbey
Campbell
Teal
Hagan
Phillips
Walker
Magor
Schuback
Voss

It’s a bit odd. Almost looks like Voss has spat the dummy and said “I’m NEVER playing LOB, Newnes or Cotts again. Delist them or offer them minimum contracts and then draft every single ****ing winger in the draft. All of rhem!!!!! Oh and get me Blake Acres. I’m not doing one on ones with LOB or Cotts any more. Tell them to stay the **** away from Charlie, Walshie and Crippa at training.”But is anyone else getting '2010 trying to address our dearth of talls in one go' vibes? Or is it just me?
