He played to well to drop him.I wonder why they didn't want to drop him. It's not U15s
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Collingwood v Melbourne - 3:20PM Mon
Squiggle tips Pies at 52% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
EUFA EURO 2024 - Group Stage ⚽ EPL 24/25 starts Aug 17
He played to well to drop him.I wonder why they didn't want to drop him. It's not U15s
He's an average role player. Decent footballer but doesn't offer anything of note. I don't reckon he's any better than Tucker for example.You're probably right but we should have imo. Still going well, fills a need and would be cheap and easy to attract.
is that what we're offering? Who are we replacing him with?
Vic media barracking for the Vics.Notice the way the reports about Logue are reported? It's things like "North declares interest". Then read the ones for Taranto, "it's down to either Richmond or Collingwood". If he's actually leaving he has signaled his intentions yet, he's just leaving the floor open probably to try and get more. Still reckon he stays.ge
Don't want to lose him but would prefer to pay him for the role he will play, not an amount making him our highest paid tall forward who isn't going to kick 20 goals in a season.Not at the moment. We're not exactly overflowing with kpp. But yeah get rid of a versatile key. Good plan,
How much is he asking for? He's been thrown forward with little preparation. I'd back him to tidy up his goal kicking. Tabs did.Don't want to lose him but would prefer to pay him for the role he will play, not an amount making him our highest paid tall forward who isn't going to kick 20 goals in a season.
I think its more that Logue's management is putting out there that he is actually going because he isn't.Vic media barracking for the Vics.
Its one thing to be an undersized ruck, its another to be an undersized ruck that doesnt seem to be a natural footballer.Jackson should be on 500k on a 3 year contract. If he improves his game he gets more.
I know he’s raw and will only improve..but gee he is a long long way from earning what’s reported. He is border line a crab.
Despite being ridiculously good, he simply doesn't fit in to our best backline.He's more than depth, has played pretty much every game he's been available for.
Cory McKernan. What a player. Vied with Carey as the best player in the league at his peak.Its one thing to be an undersized ruck, its another to be an undersized ruck that doesnt seem to be a natural footballer.
Jeff white and Corey Mckernan were undersized rucks but they were good coz they were pure footballers even at a young age who could use angles and get a ride up in the centre square. Luke Jackson lacks any sort of craft be it in the ruck or up forward.
Are we really going to rely on Pearce and Tabbs to be fit? Cox to lockdown on a gun forward with no other option?Despite being ridiculously good, he simply doesn't fit in to our best backline.
Hes not really a forward either, he's filling a role brilliantly, but you would hope he is over taken by a player with better forward craft at some point.
I think in a final given a full fit list he ends up as a sub, with a forward line of lobb tabbs and fyfe.
How much is he asking for? He's been thrown forward with little preparation. I'd back him to tidy up his goal kicking. Tabs did.
A more than competent backman if he needs go back. Great versatility. But hell yeah he's not needed. Are we overflowing with kp players? Have I missed something?
Footballers footballer. Those roos teams with their friday night games were a thing of beauty.Cory McKernan. What a player. Vied with Carey as the best player in the league at his peak.
Despite being ridiculously good, he simply doesn't fit in to our best backline.
Hes not really a forward either, he's filling a role brilliantly, but you would hope he is over taken by a player with better forward craft at some point.
I think in a final given a full fit list he ends up as a sub, with a forward line of lobb tabbs and fyfe.
Different attributes. Pearce is far more important back, even with his dodgy coordination.Why don't we play Alex Pearce forward?
Why don't we play Alex Pearce forward?
The salary cap system is basically designed so your list can't be keep players as good as Logue (as a KPD) as depth.Its a weird one with Logue. Hes actually really a depth player. But a brilliant depth player for our some what fragile backline with Pearce always an injury risk.
He is also a very handy stop gap forward. If lobb does go, and we don't pull off some miracle trade, he's a very important stop gap forward. We are in a premiership window and Amiss and Treacey aren't premiership ready.
If we can somehow put his coin together for a quality forward, then I can accept him leaving.
He’s had some good games recently and a few mediocre ones. Spent too much time in the ruck tonight – he doesn’t have the fitness for that. He has proven that his best is exceptional. I think he can find consistency with better fitness and by playing deputy to a more physical ruckman like Darcy.Man, Jackson is clearly a talent (colts people I know say he's on one of the most dominant they've ever seen at that level)... and he's shown glimpses of that talent at AFL level in bursts... and he's a young tall who's years off reaching his peak... but gee his current form makes any potential godfather offer a pretty scary proposition.
If you sat down with someone with no prior knowledge of player reputation and asked them to rank the star potential of everyone in that final Jackson probably would have come 43rd out of 44 after Melksham. Hopefully his mind has already left the Dees and that explains some of his recent form, but for a club like us who's been burned so many times chasing messiah trades I'm starting to get a bit nervous.
And I've been someone fully supportive of striking when a talent like this falls in your lap. I'm just a bit concerned about how hard we should strike now.