I literally only remember him sitting on the bench, late in the game. Is/was he injured?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He is turning 29.........
Anyone else feel like this omission was harsher than others.
I actually don’t think Macmillan has been that bad.
Would rather Atley and Pittard out but it seems one has pace and the other credits in the bank so Jamie makes way.
In an ideal world they'd all be out.Anyone else feel like this omission was harsher than others.
I actually don’t think Macmillan has been that bad.
Would rather Atley and Pittard out but it seems one has pace and the other credits in the bank so Jamie makes way.
Yes and dropping Jamie makes a bigger statement. He’ll be back.In an ideal world they'd all be out.
Sent from my SM-A908B using Tapatalk
We're 4 weeks into a 17 week (hopefully longer) season. No doubt he'll be back at some point.Yes an dropping Jamie makes a bigger statement. He’ll be back.
He was serviceable in round 2 and he’s shown he could perform lockdown roles ala Gaz.He’s always just been......there.
Yep. Murphy should consider himself unlucky this week too.In an ideal world they'd all be out.
Sent from my SM-A908B using Tapatalk
Anyone else feel like this omission was harsher than others.
I actually don’t think Macmillan has been that bad.
Would rather Atley and Pittard out but it seems one has pace and the other credits in the bank so Jamie makes way.
Something pissed off Shaw last weekI do feel as though its a tad harsh as well.
TBH, I think our defence as a group has been pretty great for a good run of games now including last year. Especially with injury and suspension meaning its turned over a bit.
My take on Jamie's omission is that Ryce has given him a clear role or instructions and he hasn't been able to execute or just didn't!
As stated, he'll be back soon enough.
I also have a thought as to wonder with the risk of reduced team sizes that there may be a desire to test some untried players with think have potential - but who knows
Anyone else feel like this omission was harsher than others.
I actually don’t think Macmillan has been that bad.
Would rather Atley and Pittard out but it seems one has pace and the other credits in the bank so Jamie makes way.
This is setting a dynamic for the group.He will be back
Once again, Shaw is making a huge statement as Jmac is part of the leadership group
Spot on. Macmillan wasn’t the worst by any means. But Shaw wanted to make a statement and drop a senior player, and Jamie is the least important senior player to team structure
On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
It's nigh on useless enforcing consequences on a younger player and not making the senior players tow the same line.