Ned_Flanders
Make me an Admin!
- Aug 22, 2009
- 77,158
- 142,364
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- 76'ers
So she left the kids?
they share them, but its better now. being in separate houses has taken a lot of the tension out of day to day interactions
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So she left the kids?
How does he buy her out? The house is $650k. Where does he find 325K [edit: their equity is 230k]. I don't understand how that works.
Yes, there are men just like her. Her father is. This is history repeating itself in her family.
Sorry, their equity is about 230K (I think). Where does he find 125K?
Binding financial agreement! That is what he said. Could not remember it. But now you mentioned that, thats what they did.He sells the house, pays out thr loan and splits the equity. Or he borrows against the equity and pays her out that way. Or he drafts a binding financial agreement for (sum) in exchange for her to remove her name from the Deed, with the amount to be paid by (date) plus interest, with the house as security for the sum.
She isn't getting half the house. He's contributed more so he'll get a bigger share.
He just rang, I suggested that. He said he does not want to live there any more.He borrows against that equity and then pays her out from that loan.
I didn't ask that. I asked did she leave the kids there when she left?they share them, but its better now. being in separate houses has taken a lot of the tension out of day to day interactions
There is some way around the 12 months thing. She wouldn't agree. Its all about sex where the law is concerned about marriage and divorce, and Oct was the last time and she is hanging onto that. Go figure.
I would STOP paying the mortgage IMMEDIATELY after private discussion with bank first. Force wifey's and the dill boyfriend's hand.
That's a terrible idea. The Bank just forecloses on the mortgage and you lose everything.
He just rang, I suggested that. He said he does not want to live there any more.
Banks very reluctant to foreclose and would not under the mortgage agreement likely to be able to do so within 3 months of default anyway. He needs to find it and read it and discuss it with bank manager.
He deposits the mortgage into a fixed deposit account arrangement ) at the bank. Tell her he has cancelled the payments.
Pressure to resolve and negiate.
Her tactic will be delay delay delay obfuscate and more delay. You ought know that as a Family law specialist!?
Men and women are different, but equal.There is a way you can get divorced sooner, and she doesnt have to agree (but you need to take it to court). Sex isnt important under Australian Family law with regards to divorce; separation is.
That said, property settlements can be resolved well before Divorce, meaning the divorce itself is largely an administrative step formally dissolving the union at Law.
I feel for the bloke, but this is not a gendered situation (your mate could have just as easily started banging someone and the roles could be reversed). Men dont have more (or less) rights under any relevant laws here.
I actually have a lot of concern for how you described the situation in your Thread title and OP. It's got nothing to do with a 'mans' rights. It's got to do with a persons rights, who finds themselves in a situation your friend happens to find himself.
I didn't ask that. I asked did she leave the kids there when she left?
BTW, good that its better.
God advice. So far it has been 50/50. And they have written plans out, but she has not stuck to them, leaving him with the kids too long, but then not moving out of the house on the agreed day, and she has the kids and extra day. So, its been 50/50 in a scatterbrained way.And that works fine.
Just make sure if he has a parenting plan with her at present that he's happy with, he locks it in as Parenting ORDERS (via a Form 11 Consent Order application) at the local Family Court registry.
Where a lot of Blokes go wrong is, they separate, and then they move out of the house (the wife and kids stay in the house). When time comes for them to seek a Parenting plan for contact with the kids, the wife gets the larger share of 'custody' as a result (the kids are settled in the family home with Mum, and Dad is currently living in a small flat somewhere like a 20 year old again).
That works both ways; it's just (in my experience) its often the bloke that leaves the family home when things go pear shaped, or when it's the woman that leaves, she takes the kids with her.
If the latter happens (she takes the kids) you can get a Recovery Order from the Family court to bring them back, but you might not want to subject your kids to that (it involves the Police bringing them back to the house).
Ultimately all this sh*t works better when the parties are being reasonable and rational. Unfortunately, we're talking a breakdown of a relationship, and contact with your own Kids, so 'reasonable and rational' is easier said than done.
OK. She gets in her car and leaves. Are the kids in her car when she is driving out of the driveway?I answered that - they share them (so some days with her, some days with him)
OK. She gets in her car and leaves. Are the kids in her car when she in driving out of the driveway?
I don't mean an agreement once she is settled.
Reverse the sexes, but we don't have the same potential for violence.
God advice. So far it has been 50/50. And they have written plans out, but she has not stuck to them, leaving him with the kids too long, but then not moving out of the house on the agreed day, and she has the kids and extra day. So, its been 50/50 in a scatterbrained way.
OK. This woman is trying to literally replace the father with the boyfriend. I won't go into detail, but it is creepy. I know her fairly well, and what he says is not surprising. She talks about "her" children. She is a domineering individual. Great that your friend got it sorted. This is a different situation. I'm pretty sure your friend would have a hard time leaving the kids like that if her husband was like this and she left the family home with another woman in the house with her husband.no, because she needed to set up a house
people need to be fair to the kids and not use them as weapons. their issues are with each other, not with how each is as a parent
OK. This woman is trying to literally replace the father with the boyfriend.
You want women to be able to fight and damage as much as men when they lose it? I don't know what you are trying to get upset over here?Ok, now I'm even more disturbed.
That kind of thinking is repugnant, sexist, outdated and plainly wrong.
OK. This woman is trying to literally replace the father with the boyfriend. I won't go into detail, but it is creepy. I know her fairly well, and what he says is not surprising. She talks about "her" children. She is a domineering individual. Great that your friend got it sorted. This is a different situation. I'm pretty sure your friend would have a hard time leaving the kids like that if her husband was like this and she left the family home with another woman in the house with her husband.
What?! Maybe you didn't understand what I meant. I mean with the kids, everything.Which she is entitled to do. Just like he could get a new partner and do the same.
Should clarify. They don't live together. They share the house 4 days on, 4 days off. He goes to family, and she goes off with her boyfriend and stays at a hotel.and if she stops access he can get the court to intervene. refusing to leave until they are divorced wont make it any better