Play Nice Admin, Finance, Members, Ratings, Crowds, Policies - Please refer to each sports own boards

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
There is one interesting aspect about this tour by Argentina and Brazil for me.

Back in 1988, we invited both Argentina and Brazil to compete in the Bicentennial Cup, a small tournament to celebrate our bicentenary.

On 7 July 1988 we lost 1-0 to Brazil in front of 11,214 fans at Olympic Park, Melb.

On 14 July 1988 we famously defeated then reigning world champs, Argentina, 4-1 in front of 18,985 fans at the Sydney Football Stadium.

In the final, played on 17 July 1988, we lost 2-0 to Brazil in front of 28,161 fans at the Sydney Football Stadium.

It has to be said, it would appear there is far more interest in Argentina and Brazil, and the world game more generally, than existed nearly 30 years ago.
 
Melbourne will be plastered over the pitch and the commentators will of course mention Melbourne a number of times.You know very little about marketing by your negative comments.
I suppose you reckon the Tennis Open and F1 GP are a waste of money as well! That must be why Sydney are always trying to pinch them so they can lose money?
Over the years the State government who actually owns the MCG has put in hundreds of millions of dollars into improvements at the G

Dude, how about you focus on actually logically articulating how the $10 million is actually good "marketing" value rather than relying on ad hominem rubbish?

Are you seriously comparing the Australian Open and the GP with this game, or the two of them with each-other even? These are perpetual events with a far, far, far greater international focus than a soccer friendly between Argentina and Brazil will have.

The Australian Open investment has been a bricks and mortar investment in one of the worlds greatest tennis precincts nested in one of the worlds greatest sporting precincts. The GP is a temporary set up that is assembled and dissembled each year and almost certainly at a significant economic loss. If this friendly is at a $10 million net loss to government then that is a lot of money (to the extent it is justified by "brand awareness") for a game that will not be watched by many people outside of Argentina and Brazil.
 
and moreover, (speaking as someone who lives outside Australia) showing Melbourne with a soccer game is pretty much who gives a ****... ie so Melbourne is just the same as every other western city we know of, and they play soccer. Nothing different, nothing novel, nothing to make me want to go there. I think its nice for Australian soccer fans and sports fans to enjoy a match like this, but this will have absolutely 0 visibility outside Australia, and if there is any its not exactly selling the country for what it is... it just appears as a euro-lite destination. People are much more interested in Australia for how we are different, not for playing host to other countries playing soccer.

Great post

It's ye old cultural cringe rearing its ugly head again
 

Log in to remove this ad.

AFL
A-league
NRL
TV
 
Over the years the State government who actually owns the MCG has put in hundreds of millions of dollars into improvements at the G
The MCG Trust - a government trust - owns the land the MCG is built on and the National Sports Museum ie all its contents. It now owns the Yarra Park land the car park is on, it took over that land and responsibility within the last decade. The Melbourne Cricket Club - a private organisation - own all the buildings on that land.

I'm pretty sure the Vic government provided the funding for the old Olympic Stand built for the 1956 Olympics, but it didnt spend any money on the MCG until it put in $77m of the $434mil needed to redevelop the northern half of the ground between 2002-2006 for the 2006 Commonwealth Games. The feds were going to put in $90mil but Grocon and the unions wouldn't sign their approved work place agreement, so Howard pulled the funding and Bracks stepped in with a bit less than what the feds were going to grant to the MCC.
 
......., but this will have absolutely 0 visibility outside Australia, and if there is any its not exactly selling the country for what it is... it just appears as a euro-lite destination. People are much more interested in Australia for how we are different, not for playing host to other countries playing soccer.

I suspect a s**t load of Brazilians and Argentinians will be watching and take in the views of and from the G. But I agree with your other points.
 
race
NRL
NRL CEO Todd Greenberg gave a 30 minute interview to ABC broadcaster Andrew Moore on Sunday and it was aired on ABC News 24 at midday. He discussed the gambling issue, salary cap and the bunker as his top 3 challenges, but he discussed many other issues and you can watch on iview at;

http://iview.abc.net.au/programs/nr...-todd-greenberg-nrl-ceo/NU1752H001S00#playing
 
The MCG Trust - a government trust - owns the land the MCG is built on and the National Sports Museum ie all its contents. It now owns the Yarra Park land the car park is on, it took over that land and responsibility within the last decade. The Melbourne Cricket Club - a private organisation - own all the buildings on that land.

I'm pretty sure the Vic government provided the funding for the old Olympic Stand built for the 1956 Olympics, but it didnt spend any money on the MCG until it put in $77m of the $434mil needed to redevelop the northern half of the ground between 2002-2006 for the 2006 Commonwealth Games. The feds were going to put in $90mil but Grocon and the unions wouldn't sign their approved work place agreement, so Howard pulled the funding and Bracks stepped in with a bit less than what the feds were going to grant to the MCC.

1956 Funding was 50% Federal, 25% state and 25% city council. The MCC itself had to foot the bill for an additional 12,000 seats.
http://trove.nla.gov.au/newspaper/a...e Cricket Ground, Olympic stand&searchLimits=
 
Well done. great bit of research. I thought Menzies put some monies in but couldn't remember what sort of figure.

So the MCC got the old Olympic/Northern Stand for free.

As for the $10 million its a drop in the bucket compared to what has been lost on the F1 GP over the years and the hundreds of millions spent on Melbourne Park by both sides of politics.

So you think no one in the soccer world will be interested in watching two of the top national teams go at it?

Lets see what the local TV ratings are like I bet it out rates any AFL match that week.
 
So the MCC got the old Olympic/Northern Stand for free.

As for the $10 million its a drop in the bucket compared to what has been lost on the F1 GP over the years and the hundreds of millions spent on Melbourne Park by both sides of politics.

So you think no one in the soccer world will be interested in watching two of the top national teams go at it?

Lets see what the local TV ratings are like I bet it out rates any AFL match that week.
I think plenty will be interested in watching them go at it. Not sure why Vic is paying $10 mill for them to be able to.

Sent from my XT1068 using Tapatalk
 
So the MCC got the old Olympic/Northern Stand for free.

As for the $10 million its a drop in the bucket compared to what has been lost on the F1 GP over the years and the hundreds of millions spent on Melbourne Park by both sides of politics.

So you think no one in the soccer world will be interested in watching two of the top national teams go at it?

Lets see what the local TV ratings are like I bet it out rates any AFL match that week.

I look forward to the paper plane flying season again.
 
So you think no one in the soccer world will be interested in watching two of the top national teams go at it?

Lets see what the local TV ratings are like I bet it out rates any AFL match that week.

Manchester City and Real Madrid were here last year, and the ratings werent anything to write home about (281,000 and 289,000)
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Manchester City and Real Madrid were here last year, and the ratings werent anything to write home about (281,000 and 289,000)

It will be interesting to see how it rates (though the Australian ratings are irrelevant to the question of justifying the $10m price tag. Since the "big blue" grand final pulled 670k, there have only been a couple of soccer games pull more than 500k in Australia looking at your stats. Meanwhile I discovered one round where no afl game rated higher than that grand final. A majority of weekends see at least one game over 1 million.

It would be a brave bet indeed that this game will rate more than any afl game that round. Particularly with the grand final replay on the night before!

http://www.footyindustry.com/files/ffa/media/tvratings/2015-16/2016FFARatings.png

http://footyindustry.com/files/ffa/media/tvratings/2016-17/2016-17FFARatings.png
 
AFL
A-league
NRL
Super Netball
 
Its also about the unknown factor of international recognition that puts Melbournes name out there as an interesting place to visit.
$10 million is a small price to pay for that kind of PR worldwide
I'm with you on this one. Considering the money squandered by governments over the years (exhibit A the Vic state government spend a billion dollars not to build a road), I think $10m is actually peanuts considering we are getting the top 2 teams in the world to play in Melbourne. I am not the worlds biggest soccer fan, but I will be watching on TV - especially if both countries bring out their strongest teams.
 
AFL
A-league
NRL
Super Netball
Re Andrew Travis resignation, according to Caro, she is implying it was forced. Mark Evans is the new man.
http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/mark-evans-named-ceo-of-gold-coast-suns-20170227-gumto3.html
 
Industry News Summary for March 1st

A-league

AFL
NRL
 
Last edited:
Guns and roses and Adele last night would have have made the WAFC a million or so.

Where will the WAFC recoup this money at the new stadium - although the Government has repeatedly said football will not be worse off at the new stadium.
 
Guns and roses and Adele last night would have have made the WAFC a million or so.

Where will the WAFC recoup this money at the new stadium - although the Government has repeatedly said football will not be worse off at the new stadium.
Crown have dumped NRL clubs Storm and South Sydney sponserships when they expire due to revenue problems at their casinos
 
Thursday News

Soccer
AFL
NRL
  • Fox League Wednesday - League Life 42,000, NRL 360 41,000
Rugby Union
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top