Autopsy AFL 2023 Round 23 - Crows v Swans Sat Aug 19th 7:40pm EST (AO)

[Rod Stroker]

LOL!

Fox commentators just said they asked for the ARC vision, but it was "not available"

What a shambles of a competition, governance is a complete joke.

Don't anyone ever say that Gil has done a good job, he's leaving the game with more issues than he started with.

 

[okeydoke7]

what a joke of a league seriously

Yep. Absolutely embarrassing that

 

[Nuggs Bunny]

Pointing out to all the “but it didn’t hit the padding” people that the umpire never claimed it hit the padding.


Also, there’s absolutely no way to tell from the potato vision and angles whether that hit the post or not and anyone saying they can is seeing things.

The footage is 100% inconclusive

Only thing we have to go on is the umpire here.

Does that mean the umpire 100% didn’t get it wrong? No. He could have.

Not sure if your TV sucks but the vision was clear and it was a goal.

 

[bonehilda]

Serves the arrogant bastards right for celebrating too early, that's karma for you.

They celebrated because it was a goal you prick

 

[JyeDye]

Whether it hit or not, that right there is the whole point of the review system. Why would the umpire not use it?

 

[mrmonkey]

Here is the thing the umpire could have called for a review but the soft call would be a behind. The third umpire would have called it insufficient evidence to overturn the decision. It's a bit like the marchbank decision last week. It's a massive flaw in the system.

 

[twiggy4PM]

I mean, there's "no spike" because there's a hand that hits the post at the same time. There would be a spike, it would just be impossible to differentiate.

Don't get me wrong, if I was a Crows fan I'd be livid, I get that. But the evidence is inconclusive. If it had gone upstairs it would have been umpire's call.

No it wouldn't have been umpires call. The ball clearly never touched the post. If he went upstaits it would have been a goal.

 

[Captain Morgan]

I mean, half your goals in the last quarter were set up by s**t frees or non calls and there were two clear front on hits to Heeney and Francis in our forward 50, so... Fair I guess?

Your entire lead was built on soft frees

 

[Drewie11]

If you can stream 5aa Adelaide, it's bloody funny!

Calm down making up the numbers

 

[J_Moore]

Crows lose by a feather. Whilst most Australians have no idea how much the world moves to Tyrannical abyss. Sport is at least a distraction to how ignorant people are. Guess you all watch Mainstream media and think it isn't just propaganda lol

On Redmi Note 9 Pro using BigFooty.com mobile app

What the **** is a Redmi Note Pro 9?

 

[apollo_creed]

Tom Lynch all over again.

Oh please. This was likely a goal, that one was likely a point.

 

[Burtonsgottago]

I almost hope it didn’t so crow fans can s**t the bed even harder

If this is how you want games decided then good for you

 

[Crowbling]

We are so unclutch that even our goals are behinds.

 

[Magma]

Here is the thing the umpire could have called for a review but the soft call would be a behind. The third umpire would have called it insufficient evidence to overturn the decision. It's a bit like the marchbank decision last week. It's a massive flaw in the system.

other than the evidence of it not hitting the post and not being touched until behind the line?

 

[Brett C]

The problem is they saw a goal and acted accordingly. There was no whistle. Waving flags make * all sound pal.

Maybe watch the goal umpire pal who signalled straight away.

 

[Mr MysteryGuest]

Was apparently clear to the bloke standing 1 meter from it. You're watching on TV with 280p replay quality. I'm backing the umpire

Why didn’t he ask for a review?

 

[.Shotties.]

Are you serious?

Yeah, like Florent being tackled just as he got the ball being given holding the ball which got put into 50 for a Walker goal, Keene a clear throw / missed bandpass/ Schoenberg getting that free with two arms clearly under the shoulder.

 

[Seb78]

Wow! Clear goal there. Shocking miss by the goal umpire

 

[TRP1996]

Even if it was a goal, Sydney would have waltzed out of the centre clearance and won it with a goal after the siren. It’s simply the Crows way.

This is much funnier, though.

 

[ptrg]

Front on slow mo shows it never goes into/behind the post while spinning


Impossible for it to touch - there's always an airgap

 

[RedBloodBlackSwan]

Don't know why Sydney players are celebrating.
They basically didn't rock up for the last quarter and won due to Adelaide's ineptness to finish them off.

Agree

 

[HairyO]

I love all the non Crows supporters triggering the Crows supporters by saying it was a goal.

Brilliant.

 

[Section226]

FoxFooty are absolute dills when they show replays of the non-goal.

Play it in normal speed or maybe half-speed.

We're looking for a deflection or change in the ball's rotation.

Super-slow motion won't show that.

 

[arakaan]

Cheer Cheer the red and the white
no score review on saturday night

 

[.Shotties.]

Your entire lead was built on soft frees

You'd assume we had more frees inside 50 or shots from frees, wouldn't you?