Stevi_Tigers
TheBrownDog
- Joined
- Mar 2, 2013
- Posts
- 55,058
- Reaction score
- 116,843
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- Manchester United
Is it any good or has everyone still got a big ant hard on
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Hey, I turned those ratings upside down.I can't believe you copied the game ratings, made some adjustments and called them yours!
Feels like you are in one of either camp tbh. It's pretty fun. A few glitchy stuff but they'll get sorted outIs it any good or has everyone still got a big ant hard on
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
I've had some similar games, it's exhilarating. I've come back from large margins a number of times and had the opposite happen to me which makes me believe momentum has been coded into the game - I love it.
I’m just happy to have a footy game at allFeels like you are in one of either camp tbh. It's pretty fun. A few glitchy stuff but they'll get sorted out
Who knew an AFL player would play this live?


5.16 sounds like a normal game these days. Teams don't know how to kick
Online in general is usually a struggle, Marking is fine in single-player for me!Am i the only one who finds the marking so ******* diffcult. I found the last game’s marking system to be fine and you had to actually get good at it, however I played an online game and I had to quit because I was finding marking impossible and the other guy seemed to hadn’t it down pat. Not sure if the Port team just has low marking skills but I quit in the third quarter and I lost marks 22-13, would’ve been a lot worse had I kept playing.
As long as it’s not as bad as it was on Live 1Sounds like rubberband AI to me. Which would suck.
Hope I'm wrong.
And finally, here are the team ratings based on the new player ratings:
Collingwood: 85
Richmond: 84
GWS: 84
Geelong: 84
West Coast: 84
Brisbane: 83
Western Bulldogs: 83
Essendon: 83
Hawthorn: 83
Melbourne: 83
Port Adelaide: 82
Adelaide: 82
Carlton: 82
St Kilda: 82
Sydney: 82
North Melbourne: 82
Fremantle: 81
Gold Coast: 80
Pro Mode does have a stats page it is just hiddenCareer mode really needs player cards where you can see their stats and game totals. And league wide stat pages to see who's leading the Coleman etc.
before Collingwood was 84 and gold Coast was 78, so it was 6 before. But it's not as simple as that because before, Gold Coast could have been on a high 78 and now are on a low 80 hence, could a matter of fact be the same range as before.So the difference between the best to worst team is now 5 points instead of 7?
before Collingwood was 84 and gold Coast was 78, so it was 6 before. But it's not as simple as that because before, Gold Coast could have been on a high 78 and now are on a low 80 hence, could a matter of fact be the same range as before.
pre- ratings adjustment --> 84 minus 78.75 = 5.25A high 78 is still lower than a low 80. I still can't work out how you've rated a lot of the bottom end players on lists either. Some of them seem plain weird to say the least.
There’s separate menus for player and AI sliders, I turned up a few different ones to get better AI accuracy, there’s sliders for accuracy at different range, general set shot and shots on the run, from memory I put close to goal in the 70s and then went down from there depending on the distance from goalIs it the goal kicking accuracy sliders that make AI goal kicking better, or are they for the user? I went from 50 to 65 and it's still rubbish. Any one know?