The fielding is a bit unlucky and also a bit shite tonight.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
In the 434 game or this game or both?We needed 500
Can somebody explain to me the logic in Worrall playing ahead of Tremain? Surely Tremain is the one with the potential for an extended International career.
Maybe we were protecting him from this track?
de Kock is absolutely magnificent to watch. It's an easy comparison to compare him to Gilchrist due to the similarities in role, but it's pretty justified.
Lost this game with the bat really. We were never going to defend that target.
Boland's cheap wickets shouldn't overshadow the fact he's nowhere near the level required. Worrall is a state cricketer at best and Marsh struggled too, though he'd do better behind better front liners. Watson is a big loss for this side for his bowling as much as he is for his batting.
I thought that was one of the reasons Boland was getting a look in?Has Starc got some sort of contract where he is the only one allowed to bowl yorkers? I left work once the Saffers were about on 215 or so and can't remember seeing one bowled.
Boland 3 for.I thought that was one of the reasons Boland was getting a look in?
Where was the other Marshmallow brother.I love this. I get so much entertainment reading the whinging
Yeah, but they are all probably injuredBoland
Tremain
Mennie
Worrall
Trash. Absolute trash.
I could literally name 12 active seam bowlers who should be named ahead of them.
Oh Christopher you silly boyI love this. I get so much entertainment reading the whinging
Oh Christopher you silly boy
With that bowling line up mate we need 450+Problem Mark?
We needed 350 at Centurion. All Smiffy's fault for his Watson impersonation
Just think about this. What is a considered a weak bowling line up and still no West Aussies in sight.With that bowling line up mate we need 450+