- Moderator
- #3,151
I don't like the idea of pushing long-serving club legends out, but if he were to go, it may be better for the team long-term.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I agree.I think the role is much needed and he is a Mourinho choice so it can be hard to not like this.
Scarred a bit by Baldini who was also much needed, albeit not AVB's selection
The games changed to the point where it is definitely needed. Feels like you need 3 key people involved now whereas it used to be twoI agree.
We went down the DoF route which seemed quite progressive at the time and seen as quite continental but it didn’t work out.... now some see it as lagging behind if you don’t have a DoF.
Also did lol at this
Poch 4 times as many votes as Keith. LOL
I bet it's the players fault because they aren't taking a paycut....Millionaire’s ‘disgraceful’ secret deal
Tottenham chairman Daniel Levy is quickly becoming one of the most hated men in English sport over his “pure greed” at a time of crisis.www.news.com.au
He's an absolute prick. Only in it for himself and his mate Joe.
Art Vandelay_ I'd like to know what you think of this.
Also have a look at how Joe made his money. Slimey character. As most who base in the Bahamas or Cayman Islands tend to beMillionaire’s ‘disgraceful’ secret deal
Tottenham chairman Daniel Levy is quickly becoming one of the most hated men in English sport over his “pure greed” at a time of crisis.www.news.com.au
He's an absolute prick. Only in it for himself and his mate Joe.
Art Vandelay_ I'd like to know what you think of this.
What I think is that it is disgusting our players haven’t offered or accepted a wage cut.Millionaire’s ‘disgraceful’ secret deal
Tottenham chairman Daniel Levy is quickly becoming one of the most hated men in English sport over his “pure greed” at a time of crisis.www.news.com.au
He's an absolute prick. Only in it for himself and his mate Joe.
Art Vandelay_ I'd like to know what you think of this.
What I will say is that the club has paid over £45m in taxes across the last 2 seasons (across the same period, teams like Everton have paid £0 and Man U roughly £20m) and much will depend on the situation we are faced with regarding current and future commercial revenues, how hard hit our match day revenues will be, how long it takes to find an agreement with the players regarding a drop in wages etc.
I read a post saying that in order to keep our low interest 23 year loan repayment agreement intact we need to demonstrate evidence of £100m cash in the bank at any given time. I know it’s s**t that these guys need to go through this but a) they aren’t working right now so I think 20% cuts in any job were you’re not spending travel costs, time away at the office etc is a fair circumstance across all jobs is something people need to expect isn’t bad given the current climate and b) the club have paid £45m in taxes in the last 2 years so why should it not take the option when we have probably paid more to this government than any other team have in recent times, Liverpool probably excluded?
It’s s**t for many but Levy is paid to look after the best interests of the club. I might get pelters for this but it’s just the harsh reality of a really unique mitigating circumstance. I really hope the players follow suit now.
It’s up to £2,500 a month this Furlough thing isn’t it? Not that it will come to that as people are on less than that but for 550 people, if all were hitting test £2,500 p/m limit, that’s £16.5m a year we are tapping into from being a very well run club in the past, meaning massive tax payments to those that come chasing. It’s tough but I can see why the club has done it, it doesn’t make it right or wrong however just giving a balanced view on why such a decision has been made.
Just shy of £70m in taxes across the last 5 seasons. I bet there ain’t many that have given the government so much. I’ll be interested to see if other clubs that have paid less than we have decide to follow suit
Everyone earning under £37,500 gross is 100% covered as the furlough money isn't subject to income tax.