Remove this Banner Ad

News Brad Crouch to Saints (STK make offer; Band 3, ADL to match?)

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Nicks want the right senior players around such a young group

My thoughts ; Brad is a bit over-rated

He wants to be oaid as an elite footballer but doesnt hurt the opposition like an elite fpotballer

Brad is not worth pick 2 however if we land pick 2 well thats an awesome win

If we losw him for a 1st round pick I can live with that

On SM-G973F using BigFooty.com mobile app
All year the message is we are going for pick 2 because we finished last and that’s first rd compo pick. He’s not worth pick 2 but that’s irrelevant.

We’ve said we will review the offers before we decide to match.

But if in the background we’ve made it clear to Brad and his manager we don’t want him, it makes the threat of matching just a bluff which will fail. Just like we bluffed with Keath and backed down.

We have form of pushing players out and screwing ourselves in the trade.
 
Damo said on MMM last night on MMM that any thoughts of pick 2 are rubbish and the club needs to get their head around that, as he’s not worth it. Damo, nobody has said he is worth pick 2, but if his contract with the Saints triggers that then his ‘worth’ doesn’t matter, that’s not the point of the system. This isn’t a trade, why is that so hard for journos to understand? Are they saying we should be penalised with our compo because of finishing last? What if we finish mid table and had pick 10? Can’t imagine an uproar then!

Band 2 vs 3 are effectively the same thing for us, how is that fair? I don’t see those same journos asking that question
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Damo said on MMM last night on MMM that any thoughts of pick 2 are rubbish and the club needs to get their head around that, as he’s not worth it. Damo, nobody has said he is worth pick 2, but if his contract with the Saints triggers that then his ‘worth’ doesn’t matter, that’s not the point of the system. This isn’t a trade, why is that so hard for journos to understand? Are they saying we should be penalised with our compo because of finishing last? What if we finish mid table and had pick 10? Can’t imagine an uproar then!

Band 2 vs 3 are effectively the same thing for us, how is that fair? I don’t see those same journos asking that question
Didn't realize Journo's were canvassed for their opinion in determining band 1 versus band 2 ......that must be the secret herb or spice that's added to the equation :rolleyes:
 
Didn't realize Journo's were canvassed for their opinion in determining band 1 versus band 2 ......that must be the secret herb or spice that's added to the equation :rolleyes:
It’s infuriating isnt it, and then the condescending “crows need to get their head around that” as though the full time list manager and head of football needs to take football advice from a journalist.
 
Nicks want the right senior players around such a young group

My thoughts ; Brad is a bit over-rated

He wants to be oaid as an elite footballer but doesnt hurt the opposition like an elite fpotballer


Brad is not worth pick 2 however if we land pick 2 well thats an awesome win

If we losw him for a 1st round pick I can live with that

On SM-G973F using BigFooty.com mobile app
Totally agree .....in fact our two most damaging mids this year were Schoenberg, who's a goal kicking mid, and laird

Laird was superb at getting to the ball first and either getting out of congestion or applying the pressure on opposition mids, none of our regular mids were able to do

With Crouch gone and Sloane on the wrong side of his bell curve ......our midfield is still a long way from the 10+ mids you need rotating thru in a game
 
It’s infuriating isnt it, and then the condescending “crows need to get their head around that” as though the full time list manager and head of football needs to take football advice from a journalist.
Barrett loves to lecture clubs on what they should be doing ......he is the most infuriating journo, who has an air of superiority, but really has no cred behind him
 
We should get band 1 comp. same with GWS for both Cameron and ZWill. Saad and Daniher should be band 2.
Would be surprised if Zilliams Contract sparks band 1 ....more like band 2

Cameron will be band 1
 
We’ve telegraphed we don’t want him, so it won’t come as a shock

Crouch has now also telegraphed that he doesn’t want to be at the Crows and is looking for a fresh start, which weakens our position a little bit.

This is really where we have to refuse to roll over like we did with Greenwood and Keath


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
 
To match you’ve got to be prepared to take on the contract, if we’ve told Crouch he’s out, then why would the Saints think we would?

Because we haven’t told Crouch ‘he’s out’

Both parties are exploring offers that have come in, and we rightly have first right of refusal


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
 

Remove this Banner Ad

If the Saints really want to avoid a trade is all they have to do is match what Carlton is offering Williams because there is know way known the AFL will screw over their love child by giving them an end of 1st compo so they’ll be left with their hands tied.
 
Crouch has now also telegraphed that he doesn’t want to be at the Crows and is looking for a fresh start, which weakens our position a little bit.

This is really where we have to refuse to roll over like we did with Greenwood and Keath


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
What you else was he going to say?
 
Damo said on MMM last night on MMM that any thoughts of pick 2 are rubbish and the club needs to get their head around that, as he’s not worth it. Damo, nobody has said he is worth pick 2, but if his contract with the Saints triggers that then his ‘worth’ doesn’t matter, that’s not the point of the system. This isn’t a trade, why is that so hard for journos to understand? Are they saying we should be penalised with our compo because of finishing last? What if we finish mid table and had pick 10? Can’t imagine an uproar then!

Band 2 vs 3 are effectively the same thing for us, how is that fair? I don’t see those same journos asking that question
He is a cnut and these guys cheerlead whatever position is worst for the crows. Every chance he gets be it in his if then column or on radio he bashes our club. He is a filthy grub and a sh1tstain of a person

Edit. Remember last year when we were an absolute chance for pick 2 from carlton and looking at getting Noah Anderson. What position did 'damo' take on the GC priority pick request?. He was shouting from the rooftops that they should get one regardless of the fact that us and ultimately melbourne were the big big losers there. Like the saying goes i would not p155 on him if he was on fire
 
Last edited:
It’s infuriating isnt it, and then the condescending “crows need to get their head around that” as though the full time list manager and head of football needs to take football advice from a journalist.
The day after Steven Hocking said player managers and list managers would have a fairly good idea what the compo will be, doesn’t seem so secret to me 🤪
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Damo said on MMM last night on MMM that any thoughts of pick 2 are rubbish and the club needs to get their head around that, as he’s not worth it. Damo, nobody has said he is worth pick 2, but if his contract with the Saints triggers that then his ‘worth’ doesn’t matter, that’s not the point of the system. This isn’t a trade, why is that so hard for journos to understand? Are they saying we should be penalised with our compo because of finishing last? What if we finish mid table and had pick 10? Can’t imagine an uproar then!

Band 2 vs 3 are effectively the same thing for us, how is that fair? I don’t see those same journos asking that question
Problem is he is going to be right. There is nothing set in stone that if Brad gets this it's band 1. The AFL can do whatever they like and its sounding like they realize the FA compo system is a joke.
 
He is a cnut and these guys cheerlead whatever position is worst for the crows. Every chance he gets be it in his if then column or on radio he bashes our club. He is a filthy grub and a sh1tstain of a person

ber Cameron band 1 gws franchise
williams band 1 gws franchise
saud band 1 vic club
daniher band 1 vic club

vic bias at its finest
corr band 2 crouch band 2

think Atkins band 3. Good result

hartigan band 5
 
I don't believe it can be that drastic an "adjustment". Whether he's in the top 5% of earners is entirely a mathematical decision, with no room for interpretation. They can't throw that out without having our team of lawyers coming at them with an appeal. On the other hand, what I expect could happen is that they could adjust "down" in a marginal case for us, where they might adjust "up" for someone with a Victorian aura.

Well that’s how I interpreted things recently, but it seems as if the AFL are moving the goalposts considerably in what power this committee has. To me they almost seemed to indicate that they could interpret players as ‘belonging’ in Band 1 or not.

For instance, I think the article mentioned that Jeremy Cameron would gain band 1 compensation, even though I was under the impression that Geelong had offered him less than what GWS had, which was $750k




Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top