- May 8, 2006
- 13,700
- 11,422
- AFL Club
- Essendon
- Other Teams
- NYJ
He played nearly 200 games and kicked 45+ goals in five different seasons. A great example of longevity if anything, as a small forward.
Roger that.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He played nearly 200 games and kicked 45+ goals in five different seasons. A great example of longevity if anything, as a small forward.
Did you miss the past few days fall out from the mentioned topic.
Harvey's words yesterday " that in hindsight it shouldn't be in the book "and apology?
Based on that most would call it a mistake.
Thank you for explaining that better than I could.
And hawks787, you asked where Harvey was for the first 8 years. Just because he wasn't carrying the club doesn't mean he wasn't great. However through his early career, North still had parts of our fantastic 90s team so he didn't have to 'carry' anyone. However they dropped out and North hit a period of mediocrity in the 2000s consequently where Harvey, as our best player, routinely dragged North over the line.
Oh, yeah. I thought you meant that he was lying. Yeah, clearly regrets it but he wasn't to know that such a loved and well respected *cough* publication such as the Herald Sun would try and drum up some negativity.
Arguably a heap of players could be considered better than Harvey in that time frame of mediocrity for north.
Arguably a heap of players could be considered better than Harvey in that time frame of mediocrity for north.
I'm sorry, but who? We may disagree on many things regarding Harvey, but I'd have thought that'd Harvey being the best North player of the 2000s would be the one thing we'd agree on.
Archer, wells, stevens could all have a case made for them. I'm sure there's others if I went back in the records.
Listen I've stated numerous times Harvey good player but I don't have to view him through kanga glasses or join the love of 427. Imo he's to be congratulated on longevity more than anything else.
Aren't you the bloke that whispered sweet words to Dodoro about Atley being better than Heppell?I saw plenty of Mercuri and I have seen plenty of Harvey and to suggest there is any gulf between their skills is laughable.
10 years ago Harvey ran second in the Brownlow.....so there weren't many calls for him to retire at the time.
Archer and Stevens were great players, but they were both drafted in the 80s. Boomer didn't start until the mid 90s and was a much superior player to them in the 2000s. Wells is a very skilled player, but he's no Brent Harvey.
Put it this way, the three players you mentioned have 4 B&Fs between them. Harvey has 5.
Now that's not to say that they weren't great, but two of them were stars of the 90s while one has struggled to get onto the park for a while now. Very bizarre to argue that those three were better players than Harvey during the 2000s, to say the least.
I suggest your time frames are a little of 80's... archer 1992-2007 is one example
Arguably a heap of players could be considered better than Harvey in that time frame of mediocrity for north.
Heppell hasn't done s**t all year. Get your hand off it.Aren't you the bloke that whispered sweet words to Dodoro about Atley being better than Heppell?
Who's arguing that?From 2001-2010, Harvey won 5/10 B&Fs. Good luck with arguing there were better North players than him in that decade.
Who's arguing that?
He was pretty much the only player from that decade.
Yeah stupid post.Post 306.
Stats. They're not what defines a player completely.
Mercuri was more skilful than Harvey.
Mercs was one of the best contested marks for a small you'll ever see.
If Harvey retired 10 years ago he'd just be remembered as a very good small forward/mid along side many others.
But because he plays 400 plus games it's expected by some that everyone has to praise his greatness and call him a champion of the game.
Not for me he ain't.
Gee there's some bitter and twisted loser types on here wanting to belittle and downgrade Harvey's record. He is still playing good football is well worth his spot in the side and will probably go again next year. Unlike most other 350+ players he hasn't been gifted games and limped to the line. Sure there's been more so called talented and skillful players than Harvey but I'd take a super consistent 427 game career anytime.
Craig Bradley 473 games of league football. Why is it not recognised?
98 games for Port Adelaide 1981-1985 when the SANFL was as big as any league. 375 with Carlton.
Is there any other players who have done this?
What if i told you Tuck and Boomer were just decent, extremely durable footballers who's greatest attribute by a bombthreat was longevity? Nothing against them but I'd rather get 200 games out of a Judd or Ablett any day of the week, no offense intended.
Nah boomer has blistering speed. That's an asset a s**t load better than longevity.What if i told you Tuck and Boomer were just decent, extremely durable footballers who's greatest attribute by a bombthreat was longevity? Nothing against them but I'd rather get 200 games out of a Judd or Ablett any day of the week, no offense intended.
What if i told you Tuck and Boomer were just decent, extremely durable footballers who's greatest attribute by a bombthreat was longevity? Nothing against them but I'd rather get 200 games out of a Judd or Ablett any day of the week, no offense intended.