- Nov 10, 2022
- 8,623
- 6,826
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
With generous retirement conditions how can she show damage in dollar terms
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The ridiculously beneficial retirement pensions for Federal MPs and Senators ended in 2004. Those entering Parliament after that dare receive a superannuation benefit that is generally in line with industry standards.With generous retirement conditions how can she show damage in dollar terms
My wife’s favourite programmeMuster dogs is entertaining
Your post is incomprehensible.Sharri Markson dropping the bombs tonight that all parties have been summoned back to court tomorrow where Wilkinson is going to claim to be a victim in this from channel 10 and also the fact Brittany Higgins lawyer allegedly wrote Higgins medical certificate..
Wilkinson waving legal privilege.
Your post is incomprehensible.
Link to a credible coherent source so we can all understand.
Sharri Markson lol. What a prize rape apologist nutter.Sharri Markson dropping the bombs tonight that all parties have been summoned back to court tomorrow where Wilkinson is going to claim to be a victim in this from channel 10 and also the fact Brittany Higgins lawyer allegedly wrote Higgins medical certificate..
Wilkinson waving legal privilege.
Sharri Markson dropping the bombs tonight that all parties have been summoned back to court tomorrow where Wilkinson is going to claim to be a victim in this from channel 10 and also the fact Brittany Higgins lawyer allegedly wrote Higgins medical certificate..
Wilkinson waving legal privilege.
Yep.
This possibly gives an insight as to where the parties believe the judgement will fall.Others will know more, but costs can be split up based on the judgement. I think if people prolong things unnecessarily or otherwise act shadily and so on.
think the two are mutually exclusive.With generous retirement conditions how can she show damage in dollar terms
There are separate actions being taken by Lehrmann against both TEN and Wilkinson.Others will know more, but costs can be split up based on the judgement. I think if people prolong things unnecessarily or otherwise act shadily and so on.
DID wilkinson get separate lawyers from channel 10 so there no conflict of interest by 10 lawyers who are paid by 10?There are separate actions being taken by Lehrmann against both TEN and Wilkinson.
TEN has agreed to indemnify costs of any adverse defamation finding and consequent damages but has taken issue with the legal costs incurred by Ms Wilkinson on her own behalf.
Ten says it should not have to cover Wilkinson's legal bill in the defamation case because it was not reasonable for her to be represented by separate lawyers, led by Sydney silk Sue Chrysanthou, SC, rather than the network's own team, headed by Dr Matt Collins, KC. Both barristers are experienced defamation silks.
In short Ms Wilkinson is arguing that her interests and Tens were not perfectly aligned in the light of comments and actions taken by Ten subject to her award speech being televised, including comments made by Tens lead barrister (Dr Collins) on morning TV prior to him being engaged by TEN for the defamation defence.
This is an issue relating to the allocation of legal costs by both defendants and not to any legal costs of Lehrmann (TEN has agreed these will be met by TEN for both actions if the judge makes an adverse decision on allocation). Having it sorted and a legal decision made on the matter as part of the hearing process before the judgement of the defamation is delivered in March is, as you say, good process and above board.
Not sure what your question/comment is asking but tensions between Wilkinson and Ten over their differing perspectives since the airing of The Project interview and subsequent Logies acceptance speech are now becoming apparent.DID wilkinson get separate lawyers from channel 10 so there no conflict of interest by 10 lawyers who are paid by 10?
In cases or inquires involving DJT , co defendants and witnesses paid by Trump or his associates have changed lawyers once they realised they were in the shite , ie Cassie Hutchinson in the J6 commission or one of the co conspirators in the docs case
It seems channel 10 hid their contribution to and approval of THAT speech. Certain emails may have also not been forwarded to Lisa by the media group pertaining to the defamation suit. A good decision as far as I can make out.Justice Lee has handed a win to Lisa Wilkinson determining it was reasonable for her to engage a separate legal team to her employer.
Wilkinson's legal costs of engaging a legal team led by Sue Chrysanthou SC are estimated to be in excess of $1m but the extent of Ten's indemnity extended to her will be decided after the Lehrmann defamation verdict is delivered.
Agreed and just as strange as 10 hired Collins to run the case when he’d already thrown Wilkinson under a bus.It seems channel 10 hid their contribution to and approval of THAT speech. Certain emails may have also not been forwarded to Lisa by the media group pertaining to the defamation suit. A good decision as far as I can make out.
Agreed and just as strange as 10 hired Collins to run the case when he’d already thrown Wilkinson under a bus.