Changes For Hawthorn

[_RT_]

Out:
Lids (Inj)
Raines enough of the piss poor disposal send him back to Coburg and leave him there until he learns to hit up a target.
White little imapct on the game and should be swapped around with a player like Hartigan who needs an chance to prove his worthy of keeping on the list.

In:
Hartigan needs to be given a chance to prove he should be kept around.
McGuane played well yesterday and deserves another run in the seniors
Schulz just read he worked his arse of yesterday doing the things Wallace wants him to do when he does not have the ball. Seems obvious we need another target up forward as well so why not give him another shot. .

 

[want2spoodge_pettifer]

yeah. raines needs a dropping. his disposal and vision all year have just been absoloutley f*cked. im starting to think his 2006 may be a one-off event.

 

[rfctigerarmy]

OUT:
White
Raines
Deledio

IN:
Conners
McGuane
Hartigan

Moore doesnt deserve a run ffs.

 

[Stafford678]

In: Schulz and Hartigan
Out: White and Lids if injured if not maybe Riewoltd

Some might say tough of riewoltd but we need another scoring option up forward and if you look at us this year, i thought we looked the best with richo, schulz and hughes in the team. The melbourne game it worked well for us but that was because brown, tivers and pettifer where pretty lively.

Today it stuck out so much, we just didnt have another target in the forward line who looked like the could eiether get a decent lead going or take a grab, and schulz is the more sucessfull out of the other options we have in riewoltd, kingsley and hughes

 

[Tambo]

OUT; Lids, White, Raines, Thursfield, simmonds

In; Conners, Hartigan, Mcguane, Moore, Graham

 

[IDGAF]

In: Schulz and Hartigan
Out: White and Lids if injured if not maybe Riewoltd

Some might say tough of riewoltd but we need another scoring option up forward and if you look at us this year, i thought we looked the best with richo, schulz and hughes in the team. The melbourne game it worked well for us but that was because brown, tivers and pettifer where pretty lively.

Today it stuck out so much, we just didnt have another target in the forward line who looked like the could eiether get a decent lead going or take a grab, and schulz is the more sucessfull out of the other options we have in riewoltd, kingsley and hughes

Schulz is gone , Riewoldt deserves at least a couple in a row .

The ONLY reason , well two actually , you bring Schulz in is 1# ... the tank is officially on and 2# ... to try and pump up his trade value .


Had 5 years to prove himself and blown it IMHO

 

[oh_my_hat]

Moore has been tried time and again at senior level and he has proven not to be up to it time and again. Why anyone wouold be putting him up as an "in" this week is beyond my comprehension.

Schulz won't make it unfortunately (another wasted 1st rnd pick) his only chance may be as a defender where he can be lead to the ball by his opponent.