- Oct 9, 2013
- 10,911
- 14,808
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
Who has an enormously bigger claim on a spot really? Most available have been tried and haven't really been much better. Unless I'm forgetting someone obvious ?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hope not. JJ has been horrendous down back this year.Or Johannisen.
I'd be trying to keep Daniel around the midfield as much as possible
Langdon had his least impactful game of the year last week. I'm tipping Seedsman to get the same treatment this week. I think he is playing his role really well.
Where do I go to find the team?
I thought someone on this thread might post the Ins and outs, silly me.Probably loads of places but here's the official site
AFL Team Line-ups - AFL.com.au
All AFL team line ups including ins, outs, late changes, new players and milestones for the current Toyota AFL Premiership Season.www.afl.com.au
A player who is BOG in every VFL game he plays and would average double the possessions that Roarke and Scott with far superior disposal whose pressure acts and tackle numberS compare and who could become a very good player.Who has an enormously bigger claim on a spot really? Most available have been tried and haven't really been much better. Unless I'm forgetting someone obvious ?
And Scott (last week‘s medi-sub) is also an in.Ah , out Richards, Keath, Duryea
In Dunkley, Wood
You’re welcome
You are right in that Bev traditionally never has his players perform a run with role but if you get the chance to watch the game again you'll see that Roarke hardly left Langdon's side. Why? Because Melbourne's wings are so important to their structure, we learned that from the 1st game against them.I might be in the minority here but Bev doesn't play run with roles. Run with roles don't work in zone setups. You basically open up holes across the park if some players are told to hold the zone and others are running man on man.
5 disposals and 3 tackles. His performances over the period don't stack up and will probably be out of the side when Treloar returns. And I'd argue that Rourke didn't take sole responsibility for Langdon either. Just because he's named on the wing alongside him doesn't mean he spends the night running with him.
We have plenty of players that rack up possessions.A player who is BOG in every VFL game he plays and would average double the possessions that Roarke and Scott with far superior disposal whose pressure acts and tackle numberS compare and who could become a very good player.
Duryea bails us out a lot in defense.Not impressed with the standard of melts tonight. Lift your game folks.
This has suddenly become a danger game.
Who can’t play on the wing.A player who is BOG in every VFL game he plays and would average double the possessions that Roarke and Scott with far superior disposal whose pressure acts and tackle numberS compare and who could become a very good player.
And Scott (last week‘a medi-sub) is also an in.
They are sloppy in the way the ins and ours are reported.
I think dogwatch was making the point that it could be reported more clearly.Technically he's not as he took the field last week. Being a "Med-sub" is still classed as a game.
Well if that's how they officially spin it I still think it's sloppy. No I'd go further than sloppy. It's wrong-headed.Technically he's not as he took the field last week. Being a "Med-sub" is still classed as a game.
I thought someone on this thread might post the Ins and outs, silly me.
Fair enough but you need a bit more outrage. Angry emojis at least. You're carrying the side.Duryea bails us out a lot in defense.
Roarke still being in deserves melts so thats the angle I'll work pre-game.
Well if that's how they officially spin it I still think it's sloppy. No I'd go further than sloppy. It's wrong-headed.
He was not selected last Thursday and was not a late inclusion pre-game but was somehow selected mid-game? Naah, sorry. Doesn't work for me.
Three outs but only two ins? All it does is create confusion.
They should call it like it is. Three changes from last week's selected side.
Hannan, Schache, and Roarke in the same team might get 7 possessions between them.Fair enough but you need a bit more outrage. Angry emojis at least. You're carrying the side.
Spot on, Langdon played a full game while Roarke was on for 75%. It was not a run with role.I might be in the minority here but Bev doesn't play run with roles. Run with roles don't work in zone setups. You basically open up holes across the park if some players are told to hold the zone and others are running man on man.
5 disposals and 3 tackles. His performances over the period don't stack up and will probably be out of the side when Treloar returns. And I'd argue that Rourke didn't take sole responsibility for Langdon either. Just because he's named on the wing alongside him doesn't mean he spends the night running with him.
Hannan, Schache, and Roarke in the same team might get 7 possessions between them.
We're a month from finals and meant to be nailing down our best lineup and were experimenting like we're 15th. There are no crowds. Its cold, wet, and everyone is suffering from covid across the nation.
We have to sit here and pay membership money not to go to games and were rewarded with the three headed Molerat on television. In Ballarat of all places. Ugly.
Spot on, Langdon played a full game while Roarke was on for 75%. It was not a run with role.
Bevo gave Roarke a role on Selwood earlier this year and Selwood had his best game for the year. Makes a mockery of blokes who deserve a crack in the AFL