Remove this Banner Ad

Unofficial Preview Changes vs Melbourne

  • Thread starter Thread starter 1990crow
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

which one is it?

  • Shepherds

    Votes: 8 44.4%
  • Sailors

    Votes: 5 27.8%
  • WTF?

    Votes: 5 27.8%

  • Total voters
    18

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

I don't buy the argument that Himmelberg didn't deserve to be playing last week

He had one bad game. Dropping young players after a single bad game is poor selection.

Meanwhile Jenkins has been banging the door down with a whopping 1 good game in a row from 5 attempts.

The player who's been better on average is clearly Himmelberg

That's just it. When players are dropped to find form, that shouldn't mean one good game and you're back.

Form is consistent performances over a few games, and Jenkins hasn't shown that yet.
 
Forget Jj, Gibbs, Sauce, Dougy, Stengle, Mchenry and Fog.. the real question is whether dmac is an automatic inclusion and who for.
 
Forget Jj, Gibbs, Sauce, Dougy, Stengle, Mchenry and Fog.. the real question is whether dmac is an automatic inclusion and who for.

He is (in the selector's minds) and I'd have him in for Knight.

I could also see Jones going out for Mackay; young Chayce clearly has talent and I trust he'll become a gun but he's really struggled this year. Hasn't shown near the quality of players drafted after him like Butters, Clark and Duursma.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Forget Jj, Gibbs, Sauce, Dougy, Stengle, Mchenry and Fog.. the real question is whether dmac is an automatic inclusion and who for.
Mackay is an absolute lock this week. Campo was interviewed and basically guaranteed his place in the side.
 
So he should. His form had 100% warranted his place in the side.

Unlike this mythological make believe world you live in, players get rewarded for good form.

Join date May 4th. Please tell your other aliases or previous username.

Did I say otherwise?

If youre new to the forum, try being pleasant with others as a newbie.
 
Join date May 4th. Please tell your other aliases or previous username.

Did I say otherwise?

If youre new to the forum, try being pleasant with others as a newbie.

You’re*

Just following your trends of being pleasant towards others. I’ve read your stuff. It’s top shelf stuff about being nice to others.

Well played.
 
You’re*

Just following your trends of being pleasant towards others. I’ve read your stuff. It’s top shelf stuff about being nice to others.

Well played.

Youre correcting an apostrophe absence lol.

Yes I used it again.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

No, it’s a contraction but you sir, you are a contradiction.

Enjoy Conrad!

Alex. Welcome back champ. How are you?

I was wondering why a "new" poster was so salty for no reason. Hope your doing ok. Take care mate. All the best.
 
Ok so:
In Def: Mackay
In Prob: Matt, Lynch

Three outs from the Mid/Forward line of Lachlan Murphy, Paul Seedsman, Riley Knight, Elliott Himmelberg, Jordan Gallucci, Chayce Jones, Rory Atkins

Seeds, and Atkins prob safe so 3 out of 5...

Lachlan Murphy, Riley Knight, Elliott Himmelberg, Jordan Gallucci, Chayce Jones
 
Ok so:
In Def: Mackay
In Prob: Matt, Lynch

Three outs from the Mid/Forward line of Lachlan Murphy, Paul Seedsman, Riley Knight, Elliott Himmelberg, Jordan Gallucci, Chayce Jones, Rory Atkins

Seeds, and Atkins prob safe so 3 out of 5...

Lachlan Murphy, Riley Knight, Elliott Himmelberg, Jordan Gallucci, Chayce Jones

I dont think Mrouch and Lynch are going to be ins this week. I think Thursday they are going to be tested at training. From what I understand whats being said, its unlikely.

A fast dry deck awaits the team on Saturday night, so it will be interesting if they make changes for this.
 
Ok so:
In Def: Mackay
In Prob: Matt, Lynch

Three outs from the Mid/Forward line of Lachlan Murphy, Paul Seedsman, Riley Knight, Elliott Himmelberg, Jordan Gallucci, Chayce Jones, Rory Atkins

Seeds, and Atkins prob safe so 3 out of 5...

Lachlan Murphy, Riley Knight, Elliott Himmelberg, Jordan Gallucci, Chayce Jones

Judging by the TV vision they showed last week, it looked like Matt Crouch had a hip flexer injury and he was highly limited by this injury.

I’m not expecting him back this week.

Lynch with a hamstring. Could miss another 2.
 
I dont think Mrouch and Lynch are going to be ins this week. I think Thursday they are going to be tested at training. From what I understand whats being said, its unlikely.

A fast dry deck awaits the team on Saturday night, so it will be interesting if they make changes for this.
Judging by the TV vision they showed last week, it looked like Matt Crouch had a hip flexer injury and he was highly limited by this injury.

I’m not expecting him back this week.

Lynch with a hamstring. Could miss another 2.
Was going off this report:
"Adelaide expect forward Tom Lynch and utility David Mackay to return to AFL ranks for Saturday night's game against Melbourne."
https://www.theherald.com.au/story/6186884/crows-tip-lynch-mackay-for-afl-returns/?cs=4783

But given it was a hamstring I put Lynch in the probable rather than definite category. I hope they give Matt another week
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

He likes making it difficult to select him.
A player saying what he thinks and putting it back on the club.....good
Tex showing aggression, dumb or not.....good
For years our players and officials have played the company line like lemmings, never questioning, the days of Trigg.... We were fill of choir boys to boot.

Now we have players with voices, we have players holding the club to account and on field aggression both dumb (tex) and real (CEY). This board has a soon in opposite to previous comments.

The results are crap but I like the challenge being put up
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom