Remove this Banner Ad

Christians are easily startled, but they'll soon be back. And in greater numbers 36:11

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Welcome to the Ask an Atheist thread II.

Previous part:


Standard board rules apply.
 
Cause there's no one kind of atheist. Buddhism is also atheistic in nature, so what? atheists can believe in all sorts of stuff (minus deity). So ask an atheist can be very interesting but for all you 'know it all' types with a special hotline to the creator of the universe, it might be irrelevant.
And there's only one kind of Christian?
 
I honestly don't know if Jesus existed. The evidence looks pretty thin (one book as far I can tell).

And before anyone comes back with Josephus as collaborating evidence - he was born after Christ supposedly died. Tacitus even later. I don't deny the possibility that Jesus existed - I don't deny the possibility of his divinity. I do raise the issue of probability though.


Many historians who are not religious accept that Jesus existed.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Semantics.
Labelling beliefs and prayer, and practicing as a Christian as ridiculous, farcical, deluded and unbelievable is ridicule, but we do expect that sort of reaction- it has been commonplace since the genesis of Christianity in fact.
Given the complete absence of evidence for them, calling beliefs and prayer “ridiculous, farcical, deluded and unbelievable” is simple truth telling. Sorry you can’t handle it, but it’s not ridicule.

Religious believers love to conveniently adopt new meanings for words. (In the case of Christians, it goes all the way back to the foundation point of your belief, where in order to have a religion, you redefined “dead” as also somehow meaning “not dead”. That’s a corker.)
 
Do you think Christians would come into a Thread for Atheists and try and "criticise" your fellowship, your science, your need for evidence, even if all the atheists left the thread? On a daily basis. Indefinitely?
You’re changing the topic. You implied that atheists enjoying fellowship was some sort of betrayal of their beliefs, like we’re all required by dogma (of which there is none in atheism, as it is an absence of belief, not a belief) to be some type of ascetic loners.

But to answer your question - I like nothing more than to vigorously discuss the big questions of life, and if Christians are capable of mounting credible, fact-based arguments, I would welcome them on here daily.

Sadly, what we mostly see in reality is new faces popping up occasionally, mounting arguments based in belief, not fact, and then scurrying away muttering something about how it’s the vibe, man.
 
The Charlie Kirk kind of Christians are definitely not the same kind of Christians I grew up with.
never heard of Charlie Kirk- I could research it, but something tells me not worth it?
 
never heard of Charlie Kirk- I could research it, but something tells me not worth it?
Just imagine the worst of the right pretending to be a good Christian while riding on Trump's jet.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Cant be . Either you are convinced there is a god or you you are not.
Rubbish. The genuine and honest answer would be 'i do not know', cause it's impossible to know.

Anyone convinced otherwise is lying to themselves. And in this thread there are plenty of people who are like that.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Remove this Banner Ad

Christians are easily startled, but they'll soon be back. And in greater numbers 36:11

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top