The Prosecutor
Brownlow Medallist
- Sep 13, 2011
- 12,513
- 20,520
- AFL Club
- Essendon
I still don't know that WADA/ASADA handle sanctions against organisations.
Only source I can find is how the reaction to Operation Puerto went in cycling back in 2007. Individual cyclists were certainly banned by WADA. However, teams were not. Astana ended up not being banned under WADA regs, but they instead weren't invited by event organisers to compete in events; thus Contador was unable to defend his TdF victory.
I think any sanction against the club itself is actually handled by the AFL. That said, if it's damming the AFL would have no choice at all - to have the players smashed and the club walk would be a PR disaster. You'd almost have to be draft-penalised so you didn't "benefit" from being at the bottom of the ladder due to the loss of all your players; that's as a minimum.
I was reffering to players in that. At which case the discretion is left with WADA/ASADA.
Prosecutor
I doubt very much that the worse case scenario will occur if EFC are found guilty. And the WADA provisions have flexibility in their enforcement.
It would wreak to much havoc on the AFL competition and EFC.
But whatever the outcome heads need to roll.
They have very, very little flexibility in their enforcement.
WADA/ASADA couldn't give a shit what damage it could do to the AFL/EFC, they will ban any player and official found to be involved in the administering of illicit substances.





