Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How, in any way, is the author of this limiting Chappelle's speech?
Unfortunately there has been a coordinated effort to cancel Dave. RottenTomatoes gave him a 0% rating and blocked public users from giving ratings. Google "sticks and stones Chapelle" and the first 30 responses are MSM crews trying to shut him down and minimise views to his show.How, in any way, is the author of this limiting Chappelle's speech?
'I don't like this show, I think it's transphobic' is not akin to 'This show show should be shut down because it's transphobic'. The article even functions on both levels; one, as a sign to people who dislike comedy that contains social commentary they don't like, and two as a catchcry for people who do.
Saying 'This show contains all of these things that are transphobic/racist' is not a restriction over freedom of speech, it's accurate.
Unfortunately there has been a coordinated effort to cancel Dave. RottenTomatoes gave him a 0% rating and blocked public users from giving ratings. Google "sticks and stones Chapelle" and the first 30 responses are MSM crews trying to shut him down and minimise views to his show.
Stereotype based comedy is officially dead. The PC warriors won!
The most ironic part of it all - Dave's comment towards the end: "if I have offended you during this show, it's probably because I see a part of myself within you".
... which is restricting his freedom of speech, unlike the article in question.Unfortunately there has been a coordinated effort to cancel Dave. RottenTomatoes gave him a 0% rating and blocked public users from giving ratings. Google "sticks and stones Chapelle" and the first 30 responses are MSM crews trying to shut him down and minimise views to his show.
Stereotype based comedy is officially dead. The PC warriors won!
The most ironic part of it all - Dave's comment towards the end: "if I have offended you during this show, it's probably because I see a part of myself within you".
The reaction to one of his sketches was, he said, the reason he quit the first time. He shut himself down because he realised what he was doing.Unfortunately there has been a coordinated effort to cancel Dave. RottenTomatoes gave him a 0% rating and blocked public users from giving ratings. Google "sticks and stones Chapelle" and the first 30 responses are MSM crews trying to shut him down and minimise views to his show.
Stereotype based comedy is officially dead. The PC warriors won!
The most ironic part of it all - Dave's comment towards the end: "if I have offended you during this show, it's probably because I see a part of myself within you".
The LGBTXYZ community's attempt to stifle even non-serious stereotypes of their community by a comedian will backfire.
Imagine being offended by a comedian... Jesus.
The issues going through the brains of average people (ie "self determination") are not to be spoke of!
Said the forever offended by anything he doesn't like. It happens on both sides of the fence Ctrl+C - Ctrl+VThe LGBTXYZ community's attempt to stifle even non-serious stereotypes of their community by a comedian will backfire.
Imagine being offended by a comedian... Jesus.
The issues going through the brains of average people (ie "self determination") are not to be spoke of!
Historically criticism hasn’t taken the form of attempting to blacklist the person being criticised. That’s more HUAC areas.Criticism is allowed.
You were distinguishing between state oppression and private action before.Historically criticism hasn’t taken the form of attempting to blacklist the person being criticised. That’s more HUAC areas.
Blacklisting of communist sympathisers in Hollywood and elsewhere was not state action, and predated HUAC, if you want to be historically accurate.You were distinguishing between state oppression and private action before.
Criticism is allowed.
RottenTomatoes blocked public users from giving ratings.
Are you surprised they lied? Of course not. Amazing how they moan about the always outraged yet do the same thing.It’s 416 audience ratings give it a 99% rating.
What are "public users"?
It’s 416 audience ratings give it a 99% rating.
Do you think its because they don't want to be flooded by SJW tantrums?Public users are those that Rotten Tomatoes that do not self regulate as 'professional critics'.
Now up to over 5,000 ratings but not one audience review. Rotten Tomatoes are censoring opinion on this matter.
Do you think its because they don't want to be flooded by SJW tantrums?
No. I think Kidd Vicious will keep sending them.
It has 5000+ user ratings
now with audience reviews.
So it is open to public ratings and reviews.Diddle I just say that?
They are getting their arse kicked by the reaction to their policy. First only a handful of negative reviews by regulated 'professionals' but no public ratings or reviews. Then they opened it up to public ratings, and finally public reviews.
So they've already done what you said they didn't do.Diddle I just say that?
They are getting their arse kicked by the reaction to their policy. First only a handful of negative reviews by regulated 'professionals' but no public ratings or reviews. Then they opened it up to public ratings, and finally public reviews.