Is there some sort of legal compulsion for Victorian officials following the lead of Commonwealth officials? The press have demanded much from Daniel Andrews that he has had the political strength to resist - why not this?
He's either a strong leader (for which you give him credit for) or he's a weathervane easily led by outside forces. Not one of the other when it suits your rhetorical objectives.
For the entire pandemic Victoria did it’s own thing and now they want to claim Victoria has to follow the national strategy?









